dagblog - Comments for "TPM Book Club: Blowing Smoke" http://dagblog.com/persecution-politics/tpm-book-club-blowing-smoke-8735 Comments for "TPM Book Club: Blowing Smoke" en Yeah, the only thing worse is http://dagblog.com/comment/104609#comment-104609 <a id="comment-104609"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/104555#comment-104555">Rage is where it&#039;s at.  If</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, the only thing worse is "Anonymous (not verified)." Where you're trying to pass for a nonentity and people still think you don't meet the minimum requirements.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 29 Jan 2011 06:12:43 +0000 acanuck comment 104609 at http://dagblog.com Rage is where it's at.  If http://dagblog.com/comment/104555#comment-104555 <a id="comment-104555"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/104534#comment-104534">I can explain. It was so</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Rage is where it's at.  If you can't muster rage, what good is the thing? </p> <p>But what I want to know is, why are there so many people called Anonymous?  Of all the screen names you could choose, why would anyone choose Anonymous?  It sort of takes the wind out of whatever they have to say, doesn't it?  Sort of like shouting from behind a locked door.  Nobody can see you so you can say any damned thing you want.  Fun, but on the other hand, who takes seriously someone who is Anonymous? </p></div></div></div> Fri, 28 Jan 2011 23:25:37 +0000 Ramona comment 104555 at http://dagblog.com Unencumbered by any actual http://dagblog.com/comment/104552#comment-104552 <a id="comment-104552"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/104534#comment-104534">I can explain. It was so</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">Unencumbered by any actual data (didn't see the piece) it's engendering envy in me...CNN don't give a shit what I have to say on any topic whasoever...jus' sayin'</div></div></div> Fri, 28 Jan 2011 23:20:54 +0000 jollyroger comment 104552 at http://dagblog.com I can explain. It was so http://dagblog.com/comment/104534#comment-104534 <a id="comment-104534"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/104527#comment-104527">Anon, in what way was it a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I can explain. It was so utterly boring that this person felt the need to google me to find out my prior profession and then come over to dagblog to insult me.</p><p>It's funny, I thought that the CNN piece was innocuous enough, but it seemed provoke a lot of rage.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 28 Jan 2011 22:19:44 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 104534 at http://dagblog.com Anon, in what way was it a http://dagblog.com/comment/104527#comment-104527 <a id="comment-104527"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/104396#comment-104396">michael wolraich should</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Anon, in what way was it a snore?  Please explain.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 28 Jan 2011 22:01:31 +0000 Ramona comment 104527 at http://dagblog.com We get really harsh comments http://dagblog.com/comment/104523#comment-104523 <a id="comment-104523"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/104399#comment-104399">I&#039;m sorry...what?  Did you</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>We get really harsh comments from anonymous posters. </p></div></div></div> Fri, 28 Jan 2011 21:33:21 +0000 Orion comment 104523 at http://dagblog.com I'm sorry...what?  Did you http://dagblog.com/comment/104399#comment-104399 <a id="comment-104399"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/104396#comment-104396">michael wolraich should</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I'm sorry...what?  Did you say something?  <img title="Wink" src="/sites/all/libraries/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/emotions/img/smiley-wink.gif" alt="Wink" border="0" /></p></div></div></div> Fri, 28 Jan 2011 05:43:00 +0000 LisB comment 104399 at http://dagblog.com michael wolraich should http://dagblog.com/comment/104396#comment-104396 <a id="comment-104396"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/persecution-politics/tpm-book-club-blowing-smoke-8735">TPM Book Club: Blowing Smoke</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>michael wolraich should hustle back to being a software architect.  His piece on CNN about Homeland security was a snore.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 28 Jan 2011 04:36:48 +0000 Anonymous comment 104396 at http://dagblog.com