dagblog - Comments for "UK police arrest WikiLeaks backers for Web attacks" http://dagblog.com/link/uk-police-arrest-wikileaks-backers-web-attacks-8763 Comments for "UK police arrest WikiLeaks backers for Web attacks" en FBI Jan. 27 press http://dagblog.com/comment/104576#comment-104576 <a id="comment-104576"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/uk-police-arrest-wikileaks-backers-web-attacks-8763">UK police arrest WikiLeaks backers for Web attacks</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>FBI Jan. 27 press release:</p><p><a href="http://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/warrants_012711">Search Warrants Executed in the United States as Part of Ongoing Cyber Investigation</a></p><p>including this politely worded suggestion:</p><p><em>The FBI also is reminding the public that facilitating or conducting a DDoS attack is illegal, punishable by up to 10 years in prison, as well as exposing participants to significant civil liability.</em></p><p>(Serendipity: check out<a href="http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2007/november/botnet_112907"> "Operation Bot Roast II"</a> back in the olden dayz of 2007, found doing search for above..)</p><p> </p><p> </p></div></div></div> Sat, 29 Jan 2011 01:16:33 +0000 artappraiser comment 104576 at http://dagblog.com I always use...I mean, http://dagblog.com/comment/104519#comment-104519 <a id="comment-104519"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/104516#comment-104516">as a subtext, (not that i</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">I always use...I mean, doesn't everyone have an army of 'bots for this kind of thing?</div></div></div> Fri, 28 Jan 2011 21:07:18 +0000 jollyroger comment 104519 at http://dagblog.com as a subtext, (not that i http://dagblog.com/comment/104516#comment-104516 <a id="comment-104516"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/uk-police-arrest-wikileaks-backers-web-attacks-8763">UK police arrest WikiLeaks backers for Web attacks</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">as a subtext, (not that i would ever do anything online for which I might apprehend legal liability...) given the name of the outfit, and the evident failure of their cover, are we to assume that they used their home IP addresses or is state surveillance more penetrating than we mighgt hope/believe?</div></div></div> Fri, 28 Jan 2011 21:02:39 +0000 jollyroger comment 104516 at http://dagblog.com I sense a subtle bias in how http://dagblog.com/comment/104511#comment-104511 <a id="comment-104511"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/uk-police-arrest-wikileaks-backers-web-attacks-8763">UK police arrest WikiLeaks backers for Web attacks</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I sense a subtle bias in how that article was written. It seems to me that a careless reader could easily come away with the impression that these cyber warriors were affiliated with WikiLeaks.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 28 Jan 2011 20:51:48 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 104511 at http://dagblog.com