dagblog - Comments for "Persecution Politics: Glenn Beck, the Man With the Crazy Plan" http://dagblog.com/persecution-politics/persecution-politics-glenn-beck-man-crazy-plan-878 Comments for "Persecution Politics: Glenn Beck, the Man With the Crazy Plan" en Mostly, I think it's because http://dagblog.com/comment/9680#comment-9680 <a id="comment-9680"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/9679#comment-9679">Why do we enjoy mocking the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Mostly, I think it's because Quinn is just so darned cute when he gets mad.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:21:01 +0000 Orlando comment 9680 at http://dagblog.com Why do we enjoy mocking the http://dagblog.com/comment/9679#comment-9679 <a id="comment-9679"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/9678#comment-9678">Non-capitalists is pretty</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Why do we enjoy mocking the Canadians so? Is it because <a href="http://probablybadnews.com/2009/11/06/funny-news-headlines-those-canadians-and-their-flashlights">it's fun</a>?</p></div></div></div> Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:40:25 +0000 Nebton comment 9679 at http://dagblog.com Non-capitalists is pretty http://dagblog.com/comment/9678#comment-9678 <a id="comment-9678"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/9677#comment-9677">Still...there are an awful</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Non-capitalists is pretty vague. Whom do you mean? Theocrats? Fascists? Nihilists? Totalitarians? Canadians?</p></div></div></div> Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:22:23 +0000 Orlando comment 9678 at http://dagblog.com Still...there are an awful http://dagblog.com/comment/9677#comment-9677 <a id="comment-9677"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/persecution-politics/persecution-politics-glenn-beck-man-crazy-plan-878">Persecution Politics: Glenn Beck, the Man With the Crazy Plan</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Still...there are an awful lot of non-capitalists at his side</p></div></div></div> Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:03:34 +0000 Anonymous comment 9677 at http://dagblog.com Well, I think many http://dagblog.com/comment/8264#comment-8264 <a id="comment-8264"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/8240#comment-8240">A successful conspiracy</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well, I think many right-wingers hate Obama and just need fodder to support their hatred. So Beck could create a conspiracy around any aspect of the Obama administration and Fox viewers would drink it up. Ultimately, isn't that his job, along with Hannity and Limbaugh? They aren't paid to seriously analyze or discuss politics, but rather to come up with unending attacks on the left.</p> <p>This, by the way, is the same critique I would apply to Michael Moore. It's easy for the right to dismiss Moore's movies because its obvious that Moore starts with a conclusion and then finds facts to support it. As a liberal, I definitely don't want Michael Moore as the spokesman of the movement. I'm sure true conservatives feel the same way about Fox and Limbaugh.</p></div></div></div> Tue, 08 Sep 2009 03:24:53 +0000 Blogation comment 8264 at http://dagblog.com A successful conspiracy http://dagblog.com/comment/8240#comment-8240 <a id="comment-8240"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/8239#comment-8239">Great article. Ultimately I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>A successful conspiracy theory doesn't require evidence in the normal sense, but that doesn't mean that Beck's audience slavishly believes what ever he says. There are legions of crazy conspiracies with few subscribers. Beck earned his popularity by telling a good story that touches just enough facts to give it a veneer of credibibility. The story effectively represents not what his listeners already believe but what they <i>want</i> to believe.</p></div></div></div> Mon, 07 Sep 2009 20:16:00 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 8240 at http://dagblog.com Great article. Ultimately I http://dagblog.com/comment/8239#comment-8239 <a id="comment-8239"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/persecution-politics/persecution-politics-glenn-beck-man-crazy-plan-878">Persecution Politics: Glenn Beck, the Man With the Crazy Plan</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Great article. Ultimately I think the right-wing persecution complex doesn't actually require any facts at all, per se. Those who actually get their opinions from Beck/Hannity/Limbaugh are already convinced of the conspiracy, much like Anti-Semites being convinced with little persuasion that Jews are both marxists and capitalists (depending on the situation). What we are dealing with here is blind faith. To be a conspiracist requires no less.</p></div></div></div> Mon, 07 Sep 2009 19:44:08 +0000 Blogation comment 8239 at http://dagblog.com