dagblog - Comments for "&quot;The thing about tariffs is - they do the trick&quot; : Keynes, April 17, 1933" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/thing-about-tariffs-they-do-trick-keynes-april-17-1933-8787 Comments for ""The thing about tariffs is - they do the trick" : Keynes, April 17, 1933" en Flavious, did you reedit this http://dagblog.com/comment/105177#comment-105177 <a id="comment-105177"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/104873#comment-104873">Thanks for the comment on</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Flavious, did you reedit this blog, after I gave the book title. Because I can no longer find the original abstract?</p> <p>If you did You must have had some key words I cut and pasted onto google search</p></div></div></div> Wed, 02 Feb 2011 11:35:24 +0000 Resistance comment 105177 at http://dagblog.com Mu barak Obama needs to read http://dagblog.com/comment/105155#comment-105155 <a id="comment-105155"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/105015#comment-105015">Great case for tariffs.  Here</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="FONT-SIZE: xx-small">Mu</span> <strong>barak</strong> Obama needs to read this. Weren’t all of these issues raised in the  <strong><u>SOTU?</u></strong> </p> <p>Where is Bara<span style="FONT-SIZE: xx-small">c</span>k Obama, on this issue?  </p> <p>Lets form an alliance with the Tea Party, on this issue.</p> <p>It would be a win/win for all.</p> <p>We’d probably break the back of the Clinton Democrats  </p> <p>Excerpts from <strong><u>The Report on Manufactures</u></strong></p> <p> “Hamilton reasoned that bounties (<a title="Subsidies" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subsidies">subsidies</a>) to industry, which would rely on funds raised by moderate tariffs, would be the best means of growing manufacturing without decreasing supply or increasing prices of goods. Such encouragement through direct support would make American enterprise competitive and independent along with the nation as a whole. In part subsidies would be used to: </p> <p>Was this in the …… <strong><u>SOTU?</u></strong>…..</p> <blockquote> <p>encourage<strong><u> the spirit of enterprise</u></strong>, innovation, and invention within the nation </p></blockquote> <p>Was this in the …… <strong><u>SOTU?</u></strong>….</p> <blockquote> <p>support the <strong><u>building of roads and canals</u></strong><u> </u>to encourage internal trade; ……… <strong><u>High speed rail, the internet </u></strong> </p> <p>grow the infant United States into a manufacturing power independent of control by foreign powers through reliance on their goods for domestic and <strong><u>especially defense supplies.</u></strong></p></blockquote> <p><strong>The tariff</strong></p> <blockquote> <p>raise <strong><u>revenue to pay the expenses of government</u></strong><u>; ………</u></p></blockquote> <p>Was this in the …… <strong><u>SOTU?</u></strong>………No cuts in S.S.  Financing for medicare  </p> <p>"These policies would not only promote the growth of manufacturing but provide diversified employment opportunities and promote immigration into the young United States. They would also expand the applications</p> <blockquote> <p><strong><u>of technology and science for all quarters</u></strong> of the economy, including agriculture." …… </p></blockquote> <p>Weren’t all of these issues raised in the  <strong><u>SOTU?  </u></strong>Will this not solve our deficit problem too?<u> </u></p> <p>Hamilton said it would</p> <p><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></font></p></div></div></div> Wed, 02 Feb 2011 06:32:53 +0000 Resistance comment 105155 at http://dagblog.com No, I believe I scrolled to http://dagblog.com/comment/105160#comment-105160 <a id="comment-105160"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/104933#comment-104933">Thanks. Going back to your</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>No, I believe I scrolled to page 513 after I googled the lnk</p> <p>When I put the link on this post, it extended across the page to latest comments.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 02 Feb 2011 06:30:53 +0000 Resistance comment 105160 at http://dagblog.com Are current free trade ideas http://dagblog.com/comment/105153#comment-105153 <a id="comment-105153"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/105015#comment-105015">Great case for tariffs.  Here</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote><p>Are current free trade ideas and policies effectively undeclaring our independence?</p></blockquote><p>I think they are ... pretty much by definition. Isn't the whole idea to foster economic interdependence (for better or worse)?</p><p>But the "independence" aspect might be sort of missing the forest for the trees (it should play really well in several right-leaning crowds, however ... so as rhetoric goes, it's a great arrow to have in the quiver! Thanks). Fact is, what we have been doing clearly isn't working. To me, that renders all the ancillary arguments for or against the ideas and policies kind of moot. If it obviously isn't working, why are we even considering sticking with it - let alone expanding it?</p><p>And though I know it doesn't really pertain to your point, it is worth noting that "free trade" and "free market" are not synonymous as far as ideas go.</p><p> </p></div></div></div> Wed, 02 Feb 2011 03:59:34 +0000 kgb999 comment 105153 at http://dagblog.com Great case for tariffs.  Here http://dagblog.com/comment/105015#comment-105015 <a id="comment-105015"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/thing-about-tariffs-they-do-trick-keynes-april-17-1933-8787">&quot;The thing about tariffs is - they do the trick&quot; : Keynes, April 17, 1933</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Great case for tariffs.  Here is something to add to it in case you don't already have it.</p><blockquote><p><a title="Alexander Hamilton" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Hamilton">Alexander Hamilton</a> in his <em><a title="Report on Manufactures" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Report_on_Manufactures">Report on Manufactures</a> </em>argued that the U.S. could not become fully independent until it was self-sufficient in all necessary economic products.[1]</p><p>Hamilton reasoned that to secure American independence, the United States needed to have a sound policy of encouraging the growth of manufacturing and secure its future as a permanent feature of the economic system of the nation.[2]</p></blockquote><p>Are current free trade ideas and policies effectively undeclaring our independence?</p><p> </p><p>[1] <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_School_(economics)">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_School_(economics)</a></p><p>[2] <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Report_on_Manufactures">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Report_on_Manufactures</a></p></div></div></div> Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:55:45 +0000 EmmaZahn comment 105015 at http://dagblog.com A close shave, indeed. http://dagblog.com/comment/104981#comment-104981 <a id="comment-104981"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/104974#comment-104974">Keynes made his remarks when</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>A close shave, indeed. Imagine the chaos on our hands if the Feds had all that money now. Things may be rough but we have been spared that calamity.</p><p>Your reminder of Greenspan's logic suggests to me that the monetary wrangling going on now is the equivalent of employing tariffs to level prices.</p><p> </p></div></div></div> Tue, 01 Feb 2011 02:28:10 +0000 moat comment 104981 at http://dagblog.com Keynes made his remarks when http://dagblog.com/comment/104974#comment-104974 <a id="comment-104974"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/104966#comment-104966">Keynes made his remarks when</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>Keynes made his remarks when the U.S. debt was not financed by a whole array of foreign investors who would purée our capital if we closed our market to them.</em> </p><p>Very likely you're right altho very likely  we could locate experts anxious to vigorously defend the opposing position. .</p><p>My  aim was/is  to suggest what we<span style="text-decoration: underline;"> ough</span>t to  do rather than what we <span style="text-decoration: underline;">can</span>.  Seemed useful given that  it's only nine years since Greenspan vigorously defended  the proposed  Bush tax cuts to forestall   the impending  market distortion when the Treasury parked   the dread fiscal  surplus  in corporate securities .</p><p>Whew , that was a narrow escape!.</p><p> </p></div></div></div> Tue, 01 Feb 2011 01:29:08 +0000 Flavius comment 104974 at http://dagblog.com Keynes made his remarks when http://dagblog.com/comment/104966#comment-104966 <a id="comment-104966"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/thing-about-tariffs-they-do-trick-keynes-april-17-1933-8787">&quot;The thing about tariffs is - they do the trick&quot; : Keynes, April 17, 1933</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Keynes made his remarks when the U.S. debt was not financed by a whole array of foreign investors who would purée our capital if we closed our market to them. </p><p>A price control scheme would certainly encourage local production but would also make everything more expensive very quickly. It would piss off a lot less people if we developed more demand for what is made here.</p><p>If we cannot compete in a certain market, investment in unmet demand is the only way to rollover available cash to new enterprises.</p></div></div></div> Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:23:14 +0000 moat comment 104966 at http://dagblog.com Here is the originating http://dagblog.com/comment/104940#comment-104940 <a id="comment-104940"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/104938#comment-104938">Obey as far as I know coined</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Here is the <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/president-hoover-back-8724#comment-104147">originating comment, in context</a>.</p></div></div></div> Mon, 31 Jan 2011 20:37:24 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 104940 at http://dagblog.com Obey as far as I know coined http://dagblog.com/comment/104938#comment-104938 <a id="comment-104938"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/104933#comment-104933">Thanks. Going back to your</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Obey as far as I know coined the term, and it was good one</p></div></div></div> Mon, 31 Jan 2011 20:32:03 +0000 Resistance comment 104938 at http://dagblog.com