dagblog - Comments for "Welcome to the Garden Party" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/welcome-garden-party-8797 Comments for "Welcome to the Garden Party" en I like the part when he say's http://dagblog.com/comment/105163#comment-105163 <a id="comment-105163"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/105161#comment-105161">hahahahaha. Once you go buck,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I like the part when he say's "Hey hey I'm not a pinata"</p></div></div></div> Wed, 02 Feb 2011 07:09:05 +0000 Resistance comment 105163 at http://dagblog.com hahahahaha. Once you go buck, http://dagblog.com/comment/105161#comment-105161 <a id="comment-105161"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/105159#comment-105159">The thing that&#039;s frightening</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>hahahahaha. Once you go buck, you never go back. hahahaha</p></div></div></div> Wed, 02 Feb 2011 06:39:40 +0000 Richard Day comment 105161 at http://dagblog.com The thing that's frightening http://dagblog.com/comment/105159#comment-105159 <a id="comment-105159"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/105158#comment-105158">I just came across this and</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The thing that's frightening about it, WE can't stop it.</p> <p>It was already foretold.</p> <p>The image with the ten toes of clay and steel intermixed. No cohesion, Fragility, Government and in turn society breaking apart, genocide</p> <p>and theres not a darn thing we can do, to stop it. Heading to the abyss</p> <p>Fun while it lasted, right DD</p> <p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8eeCtcgEq24">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8eeCtcgEq24</a></p> <p> </p></div></div></div> Wed, 02 Feb 2011 06:14:51 +0000 Resistance comment 105159 at http://dagblog.com I just came across this and http://dagblog.com/comment/105158#comment-105158 <a id="comment-105158"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/welcome-garden-party-8797">Welcome to the Garden Party</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I just came across this and do no know where else to put it:</p><blockquote><p>It sounds nuts, of course, but such fears are now rampant on the religious right, which has long seen American involvement in the Middle East in millenarian terms. In the apocalyptic view of politics that dominates the Christian right, Muslim nations are closely connected to the rise of the anti-Christ, while the restoration of the Jews to the entire biblical land of Israel is key to the second coming. The end of days will be marked by the emergence of a one-world government and a great world war in the Middle East, culminating in a battle at Megiddo, or Armageddon, an actual place in Israel. (Beck is a Mormon, but he's always incorporated elements of American evangelicalism into his ideology.) To side with the protesters in Egypt, at the expense of Israeli security, is to back Satan's team in the coming biblical showdown. Thus John Hagee, the chiliastic preacher who founded Christians United for Israel, took to his website to praise Hosni Mubarak as "an American ally and closet friend to Israel," writing, "Israel will soon be surrounded by enemies <a href="http://www.facebook.com/notes/john-hagee-ministries/january-31-2011-weekly-update/10150109590018905" target="_blank">screaming for their blood</a>. Will America support them? Our President certainly has not been supportive of Israel to this point in his administration; why would he change now?"</p><p><a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-02-01/glenn-becks-egypt-freakout-how-the-uprising-splits-us-conservatives/2/">http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-02-01/glenn-becks-eg...</a></p></blockquote><p>There is an insidious force at work here and it scares the hell out of me.</p><p>This End of Days crap is so interwoven into the fabric of this New Right and Tea Party movements that we are all going to suffer.</p><p>Give these people enough rope and they will not hang themselves, they will instead go after the rest of us.</p><p>New religious zealotry from Fundamentalist Christians is a threat to democracy.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 02 Feb 2011 06:03:41 +0000 Richard Day comment 105158 at http://dagblog.com How do we break the Big http://dagblog.com/comment/105157#comment-105157 <a id="comment-105157"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/105114#comment-105114">Just curious. What is your</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><div class="content"> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">How do we break the Big bank...ER </font></p> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">Posted elsewhere </font></p> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">Zeitgeist - The Movie: Federal Reserve (Part 1 of 5)</font></p> <p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dmPchuXIXQ&amp;feature=related"><font color="#800080" size="3" face="Times New Roman">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dmPchuXIXQ&amp;feature=related</font></a><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></font></p> <p><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman"><strong>4,283,182 </strong><font color="#333333"></font></font></font><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">VISITORS</font><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></font></p> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">Ron Paul is in one of these episodes </font></p> <p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">FIAT EMPIRE</font><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></font></p> <p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTCKHwsKWRU&amp;feature=related"><font color="#800080" size="3" face="Times New Roman">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTCKHwsKWRU&amp;feature=related</font></a><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></font></p> <p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3i-j2skUVbg"><font color="#800080">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3i-j2skUVbg</font></a></p></div></div></div></div> Wed, 02 Feb 2011 05:50:57 +0000 Resistance comment 105157 at http://dagblog.com Donal never required any such http://dagblog.com/comment/105138#comment-105138 <a id="comment-105138"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/105109#comment-105109">No. Imposing a requirement</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Donal never required any such thing, but it doesn't really matter to you what really happened, does it?</p></div></div></div> Wed, 02 Feb 2011 01:44:32 +0000 Donal comment 105138 at http://dagblog.com Just curious. What is your http://dagblog.com/comment/105114#comment-105114 <a id="comment-105114"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/105011#comment-105011">I&#039;m a liberal, through and</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Just curious. What is your specific economic disagreement with the gold standard? I have my own disagreement with the policy solution, but it doesn't involve thinking that those who support the idea are idiots.</p><p>Certainly you aren't going to argue that our current system designed by the Oligarchy - where they just randomly turn absurd leverage into hard currency at the expense of everyone but themselves - is a proper way to approach the economy? If you won't even discuss it with people you disagree with, how do you imagine we'll get to a better place?</p><p> </p></div></div></div> Tue, 01 Feb 2011 23:18:13 +0000 kgb999 comment 105114 at http://dagblog.com Who gets to define what http://dagblog.com/comment/105113#comment-105113 <a id="comment-105113"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/105071#comment-105071">There is a point to be made</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Who gets to define what counts as "tin foil hat"?</p><p> </p></div></div></div> Tue, 01 Feb 2011 23:11:47 +0000 kgb999 comment 105113 at http://dagblog.com No. Imposing a requirement http://dagblog.com/comment/105109#comment-105109 <a id="comment-105109"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/104999#comment-104999">But aren&#039;t movements just</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>No. Imposing a requirement that one must participate in "a movement" - defined and approved by Donal - as requisite for expressing an expectation/standard regarding the proper role of government in society and appropriate responsiveness from elected officials is popycock.</p><p>Thanks for playing.</p></div></div></div> Tue, 01 Feb 2011 23:05:16 +0000 kgb999 comment 105109 at http://dagblog.com Cool. Thanks for the link. http://dagblog.com/comment/105072#comment-105072 <a id="comment-105072"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/105028#comment-105028">Somewhat apropos of your</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Cool. Thanks for the link.</p></div></div></div> Tue, 01 Feb 2011 20:51:30 +0000 Watt Childress comment 105072 at http://dagblog.com