dagblog - Comments for "Logic, smogic." http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/logic-smogic-8830 Comments for "Logic, smogic." en :) http://dagblog.com/comment/105733#comment-105733 <a id="comment-105733"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/105395#comment-105395">I currently carry a rather</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>:)</p></div></div></div> Sun, 06 Feb 2011 18:11:43 +0000 miguelitoh2o comment 105733 at http://dagblog.com In defense of Fulkuyama's End http://dagblog.com/comment/105554#comment-105554 <a id="comment-105554"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/logic-smogic-8830">Logic, smogic.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>In defense of Fulkuyama's End Of History , he doesn't represent 'liberal capitalism' as a guarantor of democratic polity. His argument is more like this:</p><p>Capitalism has a corrosive effect upon societies that do not work on the basis of equal rights. Only in a democracy where equal rights are actively exercised can the class structure, a necessary component of Capital, be overcome by free individuals.</p><p>The logic is similar to Marx's vision of contradictions leading to a classless society except for the part where the bourgeois form of life is what being classless looks like.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 05 Feb 2011 03:43:48 +0000 moat comment 105554 at http://dagblog.com I currently carry a rather http://dagblog.com/comment/105395#comment-105395 <a id="comment-105395"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/logic-smogic-8830">Logic, smogic.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I currently carry a rather large undistributed middle.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 03 Feb 2011 21:40:14 +0000 Richard Day comment 105395 at http://dagblog.com I just thought The major and http://dagblog.com/comment/105383#comment-105383 <a id="comment-105383"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/105378#comment-105378">All conservatives love</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I just thought The major and the minor was a Ginger Rogers film.</p><p> </p><p>And <em>premises</em> was what Officer Krupke   called  a house..</p></div></div></div> Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:46:40 +0000 Flavius comment 105383 at http://dagblog.com All conservatives love http://dagblog.com/comment/105378#comment-105378 <a id="comment-105378"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/logic-smogic-8830">Logic, smogic.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>All conservatives love America. You are not a conservative, so you don't love America.</p><p>Heh,heh, we especially like the fallacy where the minor premise is not in the field of the major one, Heh, heh!</p><p>--GWB</p></div></div></div> Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:19:38 +0000 The Decider comment 105378 at http://dagblog.com