dagblog - Comments for "DENIAL IS JUST A REGIME IN EGYPT" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/denial-just-regime-egypt-8925 Comments for "DENIAL IS JUST A REGIME IN EGYPT" en Quite right. And likewise, http://dagblog.com/comment/106273#comment-106273 <a id="comment-106273"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/106264#comment-106264">Since the WH was being</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Quite right. And likewise, since Mubarak was being criticized for not doing enough because he himself wasn't stepping down, Mubarak also should now be getting some praise since he has resigned.</p><p>Actually the true heroes of this story, in my book: Obama and Mubarak. And their thugs who stopped the slaughter after killing only a few hundred. They deserve a medal. or something.</p><p> </p></div></div></div> Sat, 12 Feb 2011 00:31:22 +0000 Obey comment 106273 at http://dagblog.com The Egyptian military pushed http://dagblog.com/comment/106270#comment-106270 <a id="comment-106270"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/106268#comment-106268">Praise may be a bit strong; I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The Egyptian military pushed out Mubarek to protect themselves and their own legitimacy, they did not want to continue to be the lethal enforcers of a obsolete corrupt dictator's regime. </p><p>The military's position as the most powerful actors in Egypt is as yet unchanged. The next big challenge will be to create a government, president and parliament, which control the military/police and not the other way around, and who are freely elected by the people.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 11 Feb 2011 22:04:30 +0000 NCD comment 106270 at http://dagblog.com Praise may be a bit strong; I http://dagblog.com/comment/106268#comment-106268 <a id="comment-106268"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/106264#comment-106264">Since the WH was being</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Praise may be a bit strong; I think the people who stood their ground in Cairo, Alexandria, Suez and the tiny oasis town of Kharga are the ones who decided this issue. I do give the White House credit for having decided early on which side of history was the right one, even if they wavered at times over how forcefully to back the revolution.</p> <p>kgb talks above about Mubarak and Suleiman being consistently a full week behind the curve. Quite right, and the White House was usually 16-24 hours late, "nudging" Mubarak when he needed a firm push. And for God's sake, sending as a "special envoy" an ex-ambassador who works for a company that actually lobbies for the Egyptian regime (and whose comments they later had to disavow)! Amateurish. They'd decided Mubarak had to go days before they told him so to his face (if they ever did).</p> <p>Obama's 6-minute remarks an hour and a half ago were, I'm sure, sincere and well-received in Egypt (where they were broadcast live). And he struck the right tone by not seeking any credit for his own role. What the U.S. needs to do now is keep up pressure on the military supreme council to carry out the credible democratic transition they have promised. The Egyptian people will also expect solid results, but they will lose leverage once Tahrir Square empties. So the U.S. can and must continue to play an important role.</p> <p>In passing, CNN has been stellar throughout this crisis. Anderson Cooper, in particular, seemed to change in the wake of his experience in Cairo, calling out the regime's "lies" for what they were. Even Fouad Ajami, whom I've often found wishy-washy, found and expressed his inner passion for freedom and human rights.</p> <p>Look, the White House comes out of this looking as good as it possibly good. I'm not quite prepared to write off the decades of support the U.S. gave to what it knew to be a brutal tyranny. Or the rendition of people to be tortured, in ways even American torturers wouldn't stoop to. Or the civil-rights abuses (including "disappearances") they turned a blind eye to.</p> <p>But, as Obama once said, let's look forward. It's a bright new day in the Middle East. The world is better for it. Praise all around!</p></div></div></div> Fri, 11 Feb 2011 21:31:25 +0000 acanuck comment 106268 at http://dagblog.com Indeed, I applaud Obama for http://dagblog.com/comment/106266#comment-106266 <a id="comment-106266"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/106264#comment-106264">Since the WH was being</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Indeed, I applaud Obama for the speech he gave this afternoon to mark the historic events in Egypt. He seemed to be genuinely moved in appreciation of what has been accomplished here through nonviolent protest.</p><p>Democracy now has a toehold in the Mideast in a way we have not seen in my lifetime, if ever. It's quite humbling and presents a real challenge as we move into a new era. The Egyptian people have inspired confidence in their embrace of nonviolence and a reliance upon democracy. I hope America and the rest of the powers that have so diligently denied self-determination of peoples throughout the world in a cynical effort to promote their own imperialist "self-interests" take a lesson.</p><p>The story ain't over in Egypt, but a game-changer of a new chapter has been written in Tahrir Square. I applaud Obama for standing today in support of the Egyptian people. But I remain vigilant that he - and the rest of the western powers that promoted Mubarak and other Mideast despots in the first place - have at last embraced the principles of democracy that we often talk about, but rarely afford to others. The Egyptian people have shown that they deserve nothing less.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 11 Feb 2011 21:29:43 +0000 SleepinJeezus comment 106266 at http://dagblog.com Since the WH was being http://dagblog.com/comment/106264#comment-106264 <a id="comment-106264"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/denial-just-regime-egypt-8925">DENIAL IS JUST A REGIME IN EGYPT</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Since the WH was being criticized for not doing enough because Mubarak wasn't stepping down, shouldn't they now be getting some praise since he has resigned?</p></div></div></div> Fri, 11 Feb 2011 20:52:52 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 106264 at http://dagblog.com In hindsight, those two http://dagblog.com/comment/106262#comment-106262 <a id="comment-106262"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/denial-just-regime-egypt-8925">DENIAL IS JUST A REGIME IN EGYPT</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>In hindsight, those two speeches were the best thing that could possibly have happened.</p> <p>The U.S. had signaled it could live with a transition government overseen by Suleiman, and the danger was that he and Mubarak could pull off a delegation of powers that would essentially leave the regime in power, with the opposition negotiating for whatever crumbs the various "reform" commissions would put on the table.</p> <p>It might have worked, but it would have required at least a pretense of humility, of apology, of transparency, of accepting the will of the people as paramount. Neither of those bozos had it in him to deliver that kind of speech. Once an autocrat, always an autocrat.</p> <p>The three communiques the military supreme council has issued so far are a bit short on specifics, but they've struck the right tone. An early end to the emergency law that's been in place 30 years will be a good test of the army's sincerity.</p> <p>I picked this gem out of the Globe and Mail:</p> <blockquote> <p>(Former Israeli defense minister Binyamin) Ben-Eliezer said earlier Friday that he spoke with Mr. Mubarak just hours before the Egyptian president's speech late Thursday in which he refused to step down. ... Mr. Ben-Eliezer said: “He knew that this was it, that this was the end of the road.”</p> <p>“He was looking for only one thing – give me an honourable way out. Let me leave in an honourable fashion,” Mr. Ben-Eliezer told Israel's Army Radio.</p></blockquote> <p>Then, his arrogance (honed over three decades) betrayed him, and he botched the one speech that could have given him the honorable exit he craved. Poetic justice.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:53:34 +0000 acanuck comment 106262 at http://dagblog.com Egypt has been ruled my the http://dagblog.com/comment/106242#comment-106242 <a id="comment-106242"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/106235#comment-106235">It seems like they are a full</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Egypt has been ruled my the military or rather the higher echelon of the military since the overthrow of the monarchy in the early 1950s and the establishment of Egypt as a sovereign state. The second president of Egypt was Abdel Nasser followed by Sadat and now Mubarak. All ex-military.</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamal_Abdel_Nasser">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamal_Abdel_Nasser</a></p></div></div></div> Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:13:16 +0000 cmaukonen comment 106242 at http://dagblog.com It seems like they are a full http://dagblog.com/comment/106235#comment-106235 <a id="comment-106235"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/denial-just-regime-egypt-8925">DENIAL IS JUST A REGIME IN EGYPT</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It seems like they are a full week behind the curve. This is the kind of action that they could have *maybe* pulled off instead of sending goons to beat the crap out of everyone last week.</p><p>I know so little about Egypt though, I'm clueless how to read the situation. Everyone was talking about that military council - which is meeting "regularly" now (without Mubarak or Suleiman). Keeping their positions - both in Egyptian society and in the global community - must be more attractive to them than, what? Firing on tens of thousands of Egyptians for Mubarak? It seems like Egypt certainly has as much power to crush the uprising as China did in Tienanmen, but that seems the be the only thing that is the same. Wouldn't their self-interest totally be in pushing those two aside? I wonder if they were as surprised as the administration is reported to have been.</p><p>I sure hope tomorrow doesn't turn seriously violent. I don't know Egypt ... but those people sure didn't look like they were backing down; and there were an awful lot more of them out there than were at the start of all this. But isn't this a <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-12407793">pretty cool image</a>?</p><p>Odd to be hoping for a military coup.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:54:17 +0000 kgb999 comment 106235 at http://dagblog.com Partial credit for leading http://dagblog.com/comment/106233#comment-106233 <a id="comment-106233"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/106224#comment-106224">Slightly off-topic, Satish.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Partial credit for leading off with "Egypt," ..?</p></div></div></div> Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:38:18 +0000 kgb999 comment 106233 at http://dagblog.com I think he nailed it.  http://dagblog.com/comment/106227#comment-106227 <a id="comment-106227"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/106224#comment-106224">Slightly off-topic, Satish.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think he nailed it. </p></div></div></div> Fri, 11 Feb 2011 05:58:55 +0000 quinn esq comment 106227 at http://dagblog.com