dagblog - Comments for "Why Egypt&#039;s progressives win" http://dagblog.com/link/why-egypts-progressives-win-8927 Comments for "Why Egypt's progressives win" en take it in the context of http://dagblog.com/comment/106267#comment-106267 <a id="comment-106267"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/106263#comment-106263">Providing commentary</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>take it in the context of demonstrating a specific a point I want to make.</em></p><p>???</p><p>Where do you see me trying to make a point here? The only point I was trying to make here is that I thought it was a great piece of analysis that I recommended reading. I don't make any other point!</p><p>Yes, I used a clip from this piece  regarding only one point it makes to argue something on Seaton's thread. I am not allowed to use pieces of articles I recommend elsewhere? That strikes me as kind of wacky, if that's the rule, then bloggers shouldn't use links and quotes.</p><p>I genuinely thought it was a really great and helpful piece of analysis that I wanted to recommend to others, others that might not be reading all the comments at the end of an old thread by Seaton. I really don't see why do you have a problem with that.</p><p>Furthermore, I am challenging you about this rather than ignoring it only because I really don't like the idea of people bitchin about what someone else posts on "In the News." I think that sort of thing discourages people from contributing.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 11 Feb 2011 21:33:31 +0000 artappraiser comment 106267 at http://dagblog.com Providing commentary http://dagblog.com/comment/106263#comment-106263 <a id="comment-106263"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/why-egypts-progressives-win-8927">Why Egypt&#039;s progressives win</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Providing commentary essentially saying: "You've gotta read this article and take it in the context of demonstrating a specific a point I want to make." in place of the teaser/synopsis seems to undermine the entire purpose of having a news leader separate from the reader blogs ... no?</p><p> </p></div></div></div> Fri, 11 Feb 2011 20:33:31 +0000 kgb999 comment 106263 at http://dagblog.com Not the easiest, breeziest http://dagblog.com/comment/106229#comment-106229 <a id="comment-106229"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/why-egypts-progressives-win-8927">Why Egypt&#039;s progressives win</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Not the easiest, breeziest reading. But you're right, fascinating in its detail. Worth the effort.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 11 Feb 2011 06:31:05 +0000 acanuck comment 106229 at http://dagblog.com