dagblog - Comments for "Riddle: I do 69% of the work. I earn 10% of the income. I own 1% of the stuff. Who am I?" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/riddle-i-do-69-work-i-earn-10-income-i-own-1-stuff-who-am-i-9025 Comments for "Riddle: I do 69% of the work. I earn 10% of the income. I own 1% of the stuff. Who am I?" en No, no cuffs.  I like to wear http://dagblog.com/comment/106984#comment-106984 <a id="comment-106984"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/106983#comment-106983">silk scarves are one thing,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>No, no cuffs.  I like to wear silver bracelets but they don't require any keys. </p></div></div></div> Sat, 19 Feb 2011 03:34:44 +0000 LisB comment 106984 at http://dagblog.com silk scarves are one thing, http://dagblog.com/comment/106983#comment-106983 <a id="comment-106983"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/106980#comment-106980">unrestrained sexuality is a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>silk scarves are one thing, handcuffs are entirely another.</p><p>Let's just say that if you've ever been in handcuffs *for real, they lose their allure as an erotic accessory...</p><p> </p><p>*Of course, these days with the zip ties and all, a cop probably wouldn't even know how to work an old fashioned pair of cuffs...</p></div></div></div> Sat, 19 Feb 2011 03:04:53 +0000 jollyroger comment 106983 at http://dagblog.com unrestrained sexuality is a http://dagblog.com/comment/106980#comment-106980 <a id="comment-106980"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/106979#comment-106979">Parenthetically, it&#039;s useful</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote><p>unrestrained sexuality is a <strong>good</strong> thing... isn't it?</p></blockquote><p> </p><p>I've always thought so.  And we have the videos to prove it.</p><p>Wait....we have to exclude the one with the silk scarves in it, of course.  Nothing unrestrained in that one, except you.  <img title="Tongue out" src="/sites/all/libraries/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/emotions/img/smiley-tongue-out.gif" alt="Tongue out" border="0" /></p><p> </p></div></div></div> Sat, 19 Feb 2011 02:55:47 +0000 LisB comment 106980 at http://dagblog.com Parenthetically, it's useful http://dagblog.com/comment/106979#comment-106979 <a id="comment-106979"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/106969#comment-106969">You forgot: I hold up half</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Parenthetically, it's useful to ruminate on the persistence of the patriarchy even in Hindu and Buddhist cultures, where the pernicious influence of Yahweh is not a factor.  And don't let's even start with Confucianism (foot-binding, yechh!)</p><p> </p><p>Let's face it ladies, you scare the living shit out of men.  Well, the prospect of your *unrestrained sexuality does, anyway.</p><p> </p><p>*which I find really odd, because unrestrained sexuality is a <strong>good</strong> thing... isn't it?</p></div></div></div> Sat, 19 Feb 2011 02:47:29 +0000 jollyroger comment 106979 at http://dagblog.com they needed a tsunamiYeah, http://dagblog.com/comment/106975#comment-106975 <a id="comment-106975"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/106969#comment-106969">You forgot: I hold up half</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>they needed a tsunami</em></p><p>Yeah, that about figures...</p></div></div></div> Sat, 19 Feb 2011 02:37:12 +0000 jollyroger comment 106975 at http://dagblog.com Well, the numbers really http://dagblog.com/comment/106973#comment-106973 <a id="comment-106973"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/106947#comment-106947">What a great attitude Ramdas</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well, the numbers really shocked me, and I'm widely regarded as beyond shocking. I had sort of absorbed the old "women make 60 cents on the dollar for the same job, and now we've inched up to 72 cents, or something..." but <strong>shit!</strong></p><p> </p><p> When you talk about 69% of the labor, we've gone way past "how do we split the household chores fairly", ya feel me?</p><p> Arriving from there to the 10% income, and I'm feeling really bad...only to get to the 1% number and, "oh wow."</p></div></div></div> Sat, 19 Feb 2011 02:34:30 +0000 jollyroger comment 106973 at http://dagblog.com You forgot: I hold up half http://dagblog.com/comment/106969#comment-106969 <a id="comment-106969"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/riddle-i-do-69-work-i-earn-10-income-i-own-1-stuff-who-am-i-9025">Riddle: I do 69% of the work. I earn 10% of the income. I own 1% of the stuff. Who am I?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You forgot: <em>I hold up half the sky.</em></p><p>------</p><p>Re: <em>When women get free, we all get free.</em></p><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/03/weekinreview/03kapur.html?ref=weekinreview">One of my favorite related stories, an example that it's not always as impossible as they say.</a></p><p>Of course, in that case,you could argue they needed a tsunami to get things moving. <img title="Smile" src="/sites/all/libraries/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/emotions/img/smiley-smile.gif" alt="Smile" border="0" /></p></div></div></div> Sat, 19 Feb 2011 02:11:25 +0000 artappraiser comment 106969 at http://dagblog.com LOL! http://dagblog.com/comment/106967#comment-106967 <a id="comment-106967"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/106963#comment-106963">  You said &quot;balls&quot;. </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>LOL!</p></div></div></div> Sat, 19 Feb 2011 01:53:59 +0000 Ramona comment 106967 at http://dagblog.com   You said "balls".  http://dagblog.com/comment/106963#comment-106963 <a id="comment-106963"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/106959#comment-106959">Says so right on the ping</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><img title="Sealed" src="/sites/all/libraries/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/emotions/img/smiley-sealed.gif" alt="Sealed" border="0" />  You said "balls". </p></div></div></div> Sat, 19 Feb 2011 01:41:28 +0000 LisB comment 106963 at http://dagblog.com Says so right on the ping http://dagblog.com/comment/106959#comment-106959 <a id="comment-106959"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/106958#comment-106958">You do? </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Says so right on the ping pong balls ...</p></div></div></div> Sat, 19 Feb 2011 01:35:10 +0000 Donal comment 106959 at http://dagblog.com