dagblog - Comments for "How Wall Street Beat The Rap" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/how-wall-street-beat-rap-9133 Comments for "How Wall Street Beat The Rap" en Love the metaphor...but this http://dagblog.com/comment/108302#comment-108302 <a id="comment-108302"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/108299#comment-108299">I still think you&#039;re looking</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Love the metaphor...but this is a family blog.  Can we make it "beating" the wrong end...</p></div></div></div> Sun, 27 Feb 2011 23:55:19 +0000 jollyroger comment 108302 at http://dagblog.com I still think you're looking http://dagblog.com/comment/108299#comment-108299 <a id="comment-108299"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/108274#comment-108274">As the jobs left the US, we</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I still think you're looking at the wrong end of that horse…</p></div></div></div> Sun, 27 Feb 2011 23:29:05 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 108299 at http://dagblog.com As the jobs left the US, we http://dagblog.com/comment/108274#comment-108274 <a id="comment-108274"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/108238#comment-108238">The exporting of jobs is a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>As the jobs left the US, we lost leverage on all these fronts you mention.</p></div></div></div> Sun, 27 Feb 2011 20:24:42 +0000 Resistance comment 108274 at http://dagblog.com The exporting of jobs is a http://dagblog.com/comment/108238#comment-108238 <a id="comment-108238"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/108217#comment-108217">“By all means, workers should</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The exporting of jobs is a secondary cause at worst. The primary cause is not being willing to pay workers what they're worth. To that end, multiple means are applied, including:</p><ol><li>Unpaid overtime,</li><li>Delegitimizing unions,</li><li>Fighting against the formation of unions, and, yes,</li><li>Exporting jobs to where there are no unions and wages are significantly less.</li></ol></div></div></div> Sun, 27 Feb 2011 14:19:15 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 108238 at http://dagblog.com “By all means, workers should http://dagblog.com/comment/108217#comment-108217 <a id="comment-108217"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/how-wall-street-beat-rap-9133">How Wall Street Beat The Rap</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p>“By all means, workers should rally to protect  their jobs and pensions as they have in Wisconsin, ........who are ultimately to blame for the financial pressures behind the attack on them.” </p></blockquote> <p>I'd add who or what, is ultimately to blame? </p> <p>IMHO allowing the EXPORTING  of jobs, because to those industries that left America there was nothing to lose from their point of view.</p> <p>We the American worker had plenty to lose.......our jobs, out taxbase,  leading to our loss of a safety net. Hows that for something to lose?.</p> <p>WHO DO YOU BLAME for this loss?    </p> <p>I hope the protest turns into something bigger? I hope the protestors don't disband when it appears they have won. They haven't won anything except holding ground. </p> <p>Obama after HIS self serving victory, disbanded his army of supporters to soon. The opposition was able to regroup; they had only lost a battle, but not the war of ideology. </p> <p>Had Obama gotten after the retreating foes, we wouldn’t be having foes, trying to still outflank us. We had the offensive and instead we went back to defense.  </p> <p>We need to stay on the offense, and again, because we failed to completely destroy the supply lines of the opponent. We are still fighting for our rights.</p> <p>Our opponent returns more determined to cut our supply lines. </p> <p>If Obama had more than a plan of self serving he should have been more like Sherman’s March; instead it was similar to General<strong> </strong>McClellan’ inaction. </p> <p>You can't win a <span style="TEXT-DECORATION: line-through">war</span> game with defense;  </p> <p>Similarly, make corporations and industry pay, for abandoning the American worker.  </p> <p>Instead people like the Koch brothers can attack Unions with no reprisal, trying to cut our lines of supply ( Union dues to support our troops).</p> <p>With the attitude "nothing to lose for trying"  people like the Koch’s,wil take the offensive all the time and we will always be on defense.    </p> <p>What is or should be, the Democratic response to the Export of Jobs and the importation of foreign goods?</p> <p>If the Democratic Party is divided on that issue the Corporations will continue to leave our country; why not; there is nothing for them to lose.    </p> <p>I am in favor of collective bargaining; I am more in favor of decent wages, so I can save enough for retirement I can pay for my health premiums,I can pay taxes.</p> <p>Bring back the exported jobs or Tax the ones that left, call it reparations for attacking us, because they too thought “they had nothing to lose”    </p></div></div></div> Sun, 27 Feb 2011 07:15:52 +0000 Resistance comment 108217 at http://dagblog.com