dagblog - Comments for "Petrol" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/pretrol-9187 Comments for "Petrol" en (No subject) http://dagblog.com/comment/108607#comment-108607 <a id="comment-108607"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/pretrol-9187">Petrol</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><img src="https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-O3pBfwvGLPo/TW0dpUpuyHI/AAAAAAAACBA/nFNrGqKC6js/s1600/Image58.gif" alt="" height="556" width="350" /></p></div></div></div> Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:43:03 +0000 cmaukonen comment 108607 at http://dagblog.com The real problem will be http://dagblog.com/comment/108558#comment-108558 <a id="comment-108558"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/108557#comment-108557">Perhaps a lot of the 47%</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote><p>The real problem will be convincing those hiding out in their gated community, cul de sac McMansions they're going to have to associate with the rest of us rif-raf they're hiding from.</p></blockquote><p>Guess that makes us <em>rif-raf </em>the new black.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 02 Mar 2011 01:18:52 +0000 cmaukonen comment 108558 at http://dagblog.com Perhaps a lot of the 47% http://dagblog.com/comment/108557#comment-108557 <a id="comment-108557"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/pretrol-9187">Petrol</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Perhaps a lot of the 47% allocation for passenger travel, which I assume includes commutes from home to work and back, would drop significantly if we reorganize the neighborhood where one can walk to most of the services one needs without a car. And for those in the 'burbs, perhaps a light rail system or underground tube. That way the personal auto would only be necessary for week-end recreation. The real problem will be convincing those hiding out in their gated community, cul de sac McMansions they're going to have to associate with the rest of us rif-raf they're hiding from.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 02 Mar 2011 01:12:55 +0000 Beetlejuice comment 108557 at http://dagblog.com Petrol, C. http://dagblog.com/comment/108527#comment-108527 <a id="comment-108527"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/pretrol-9187">Petrol</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Petrol, C.</p></div></div></div> Tue, 01 Mar 2011 22:14:54 +0000 acanuck comment 108527 at http://dagblog.com