dagblog - Comments for "Looking For Trouble" http://dagblog.com/politics/looking-trouble-9201 Comments for "Looking For Trouble" en Moat, how the hell are http://dagblog.com/comment/108841#comment-108841 <a id="comment-108841"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/108658#comment-108658">In my job, and I believe in</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Moat, how the hell are ya?</p><p>Good to see ya again! ha</p></div></div></div> Thu, 03 Mar 2011 22:12:36 +0000 Richard Day comment 108841 at http://dagblog.com I'm just getting tready for http://dagblog.com/comment/108805#comment-108805 <a id="comment-108805"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/108678#comment-108678">Gee, thanks for stirring up</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I'm just getting tready for the dag performance reviews ... <img title="Surprised" src="/sites/all/libraries/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/emotions/img/smiley-surprised.gif" alt="Surprised" border="0" /></p></div></div></div> Thu, 03 Mar 2011 17:08:06 +0000 Donal comment 108805 at http://dagblog.com Gee, thanks for stirring up http://dagblog.com/comment/108678#comment-108678 <a id="comment-108678"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/looking-trouble-9201">Looking For Trouble</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Gee, thanks for stirring up old bad memories.<img title="Wink" src="/sites/all/libraries/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/emotions/img/smiley-wink.gif" alt="Wink" border="0" /></p></div></div></div> Thu, 03 Mar 2011 03:10:55 +0000 artappraiser comment 108678 at http://dagblog.com In my job, and I believe in http://dagblog.com/comment/108658#comment-108658 <a id="comment-108658"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/looking-trouble-9201">Looking For Trouble</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>In my job, and I believe in many others, my supervisor is never present when I am at my most efficient. It is not just a matter of working while observed (I got used to that years ago). The supervisor interrupts or draws energy and focus from self directed activity. Maybe this isn't an absolutely necessary condition but I haven't had the pleasure of experiencing the opposite.There have just been varying levels of decreased or delayed performance.</p><p>Now I have been in situations where me and another person took turns being in charge. We ran our own jobs and sometimes had to do a specific project on the other's site.  We were able to see what the other could do at their best.</p><p>So in my performance reviews, the measure of results by different criteria made sense to me but the actual performance of what I did was usually misrepresented or seen through the wrong end of a telescope.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 03 Mar 2011 01:46:00 +0000 moat comment 108658 at http://dagblog.com I hate performance reviews, http://dagblog.com/comment/108657#comment-108657 <a id="comment-108657"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/looking-trouble-9201">Looking For Trouble</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I hate performance reviews, too.  When I first started to encounter them, they were written by my boss and I had a chance to read, review, add feedback, discuss, etc.  My last one, at my old job that I got laid off at, I had to write the entire thing myself and then hope my boss would eventually agree with it and sign it.  There was barely any discussion, it was a task we both hated, and very little came out of it. </p><p>Your mention of the retreat, though, that brought back some very good memories for me.  There was a time, many moons ago, when I was a Kelley Temp.  I got kinda burned out on being a secretary and asked Kelley if they had any other types of jobs available.  They, in turn, said they had a "data entry" type job and they felt my keyboarding skills were suitable, so they sent me over to a temp job in the Order Entry Department of a very well-known Japanese electronics firm (those of you who know me through the past few years probably know which one, but that's beside the point).</p><p>Anyway, I took the assignment and started there at $10 per hour, taking faxed orders from customers and translating them into our company Order/Inventory system.  Four months later, I was hired.  Two years later, I discovered that I enjoyed helping our Sales Force with customer service issues, and started branching out on my own into taking on some of Sales' workload.  At first, my boss balked at this.  She said if I helped our customers too much, it would make the rest of my department look bad.  Personally, I was shocked and dismayed by that attitude.  So, I just kept at it, but quietly.  It earned me a very good repuation amongst the Sales Team and customers.  And eventually my boss started changing her mind.  Eventually, the company had a nationwide gathering in Southern California, where they flew in every other Order Entry Clerk from every other branch in the US, and they sat all of us down and asked us how many of us liked the idea of going from basic Order Entry to Customer Service.  90% of the people there raised their hands "Yes". </p><p>My salary doubled.  My job description tripled.  It was one of the best times of my life.</p><p>And then, LOL, everything went downhill after that, but that's kinda beside the point, eh?</p><p>:)</p><p>Good post, Donal. </p></div></div></div> Thu, 03 Mar 2011 01:41:08 +0000 LisB comment 108657 at http://dagblog.com Agree 100%. Performance http://dagblog.com/comment/108621#comment-108621 <a id="comment-108621"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/looking-trouble-9201">Looking For Trouble</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Agree 100%. Performance reviews are at least 75% or more merely office politics.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 02 Mar 2011 19:17:09 +0000 NCD comment 108621 at http://dagblog.com http://www.youtube.com/watch? http://dagblog.com/comment/108617#comment-108617 <a id="comment-108617"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/looking-trouble-9201">Looking For Trouble</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAyDmJvjxbg">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAyDmJvjxbg</a></p><p>That's all I got.</p><p>Well except for this:</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5EYSiRltf8&amp;feature=fvst">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5EYSiRltf8&amp;feature=fvst</a></p><p> </p></div></div></div> Wed, 02 Mar 2011 18:49:06 +0000 Richard Day comment 108617 at http://dagblog.com I feel your pain.Now tell me http://dagblog.com/comment/108612#comment-108612 <a id="comment-108612"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/looking-trouble-9201">Looking For Trouble</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I feel your pain.</p><p>Now tell me again why progressive/liberals are so focused on jobs and a job-based economy when so few of them are about actual work and so many are about human relations --  not the good kind but the reality tv show or soap opera kind.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 02 Mar 2011 18:06:00 +0000 EmmaZahn comment 108612 at http://dagblog.com