dagblog - Comments for "An Accelerated Grimace: On Cyber-Utopianism " http://dagblog.com/link/accelerated-grimace-cyber-utopianism-9258 Comments for "An Accelerated Grimace: On Cyber-Utopianism " en I was trying to give a sense http://dagblog.com/comment/109126#comment-109126 <a id="comment-109126"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/109082#comment-109082">donal, I woulda picked this</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I was trying to give a sense that it was "Clay says vs Evgeny says." I did tend to agree with the feeling that, rather than saving the world, the online world will be a mix of good and bad (and ugly) actors like the offline world.</p></div></div></div> Sun, 06 Mar 2011 04:47:55 +0000 Donal comment 109126 at http://dagblog.com donal, I woulda picked this http://dagblog.com/comment/109082#comment-109082 <a id="comment-109082"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/accelerated-grimace-cyber-utopianism-9258">An Accelerated Grimace: On Cyber-Utopianism </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>donal, I woulda picked this quote for the teaser:</p><blockquote><p>....on the negative side of the ledger, the most baleful use of web-enabled resources he seems able to imagine is Lolcats, the signature cute-pets-with-captions of the “I Can Has Cheezburger?” franchise, which he adopts as a stand-in for “the stupidest possible creative act” perpetrated on the web, with nary a whisper about faked Obama birth certificates or the James O’Keefe YouTube videos. (O’Keefe, you may recall, produced a series of videos in which he and an associate posed as a pimp and hooker seeking legal advice at ACORN offices; using extremely selective and misleading video editing, O’Keefe made ACORN employees appear to be colluding in their scheme to evade the law.<strong>) For a man who spends his career explaining how the web works, Shirky doesn’t seem to spend much time exploring the thing.</strong>...</p></blockquote><p><img title="Wink" src="/sites/all/libraries/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/emotions/img/smiley-wink.gif" alt="Wink" border="0" /></p><p>That "stupidest creative act possible" line he caught does seem to be a hypocritical killer of his whole argument. Beware the eye of the beholder thingie, Mr. Shirky.</p><p>Anyhew, thank you for pointing it out, I always forget to check wassup at The Nation.</p></div></div></div> Sun, 06 Mar 2011 03:05:46 +0000 artappraiser comment 109082 at http://dagblog.com What an embarrassing piece. http://dagblog.com/comment/109080#comment-109080 <a id="comment-109080"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/accelerated-grimace-cyber-utopianism-9258">An Accelerated Grimace: On Cyber-Utopianism </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">What an embarrassing piece. Best we stick with the NYT eh? </div></div></div> Sun, 06 Mar 2011 03:01:27 +0000 quinn esq comment 109080 at http://dagblog.com