dagblog - Comments for "NOW I GET IT" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/now-i-get-it-9340 Comments for "NOW I GET IT" en Fascinating bit of info. http://dagblog.com/comment/109811#comment-109811 <a id="comment-109811"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/109784#comment-109784">From Firedoglake via Lisa</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Fascinating bit of info. Without knowing how she's been polling, my money's on Kloppenburg, simply on the basis of the enthusiastic GOTV effort that's hers for the taking. Great if fortuitous timing. Go JoAnne!</p></div></div></div> Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:10:33 +0000 acanuck comment 109811 at http://dagblog.com Oh good one Larry. Yes, http://dagblog.com/comment/109797#comment-109797 <a id="comment-109797"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/109779#comment-109779">With the old saw “be careful</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Oh good one Larry. Yes, expecting support from soneone who has more in common with the Koch Bros. than an underpaid teacher or overworked paramedic is a little bit mashugana.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 10 Mar 2011 18:38:32 +0000 cmaukonen comment 109797 at http://dagblog.com When do we get to stop http://dagblog.com/comment/109793#comment-109793 <a id="comment-109793"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/109779#comment-109779">With the old saw “be careful</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>When do we get to stop laughing?  Soon?  <em>It hurts, dag-nabbit!</em></p> <p>Dave Dayen asks one question lots of have been wondering about: Was the bill stripping collective bargaining rights <em>actually a  non-fiscal bill?  </em>Given the raft of reasons Walker gave for the importance of those parts <em>to the budget and future budgets, </em>was the 'bill' even a bill, and was it 'non- fiscal'?</p> <p><a href="http://news.firedoglake.com/2011/03/10/wisconsin-confusion-reigns-over-legality-of-anti-union-bill-passage-in-wisconsin/">http://news.firedoglake.com/2011/03/10/wisconsin-confusion-reigns-over-legality-of-anti-union-bill-passage-in-wisconsin/</a></p> <p> </p></div></div></div> Thu, 10 Mar 2011 18:07:31 +0000 we are stardust comment 109793 at http://dagblog.com Yeah that's the reason.  http://dagblog.com/comment/109785#comment-109785 <a id="comment-109785"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/109774#comment-109774">The obvious solution being</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah that's the reason.  Whatever.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 10 Mar 2011 17:50:50 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 109785 at http://dagblog.com From Firedoglake via Lisa http://dagblog.com/comment/109784#comment-109784 <a id="comment-109784"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/now-i-get-it-9340">NOW I GET IT</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>From Firedoglake via Lisa B</p><p>• <em>Supreme Court fight</em>. The matchup between David Prosser (R) and JoAnn Kloppenberg (D) for the state Supreme Court on April 5 just got very interesting. It’s a statewide vote, and the balance of power on the state Supreme Court is at stake. Right now there are 4 Republicans and 3 Democrats on the court, but one of those Republicans is Prosser. Expect lots of organizing and millions of dollars poured into this election, which is much like a political election, with debates and everything. If Democrats win, the legality of what took place tonight may be put in greater question.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 10 Mar 2011 17:44:00 +0000 Flavius comment 109784 at http://dagblog.com Didn't you mean the Habs and http://dagblog.com/comment/109782#comment-109782 <a id="comment-109782"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/109776#comment-109776">Yup. I think you can only</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Didn't you mean the Habs and the Hab-nots?  I think the Nordiques is some kind of exercise machine.  I cannot be sure since I seldom watch things like sports and exercise infomercials. </p></div></div></div> Thu, 10 Mar 2011 17:35:35 +0000 LarryH comment 109782 at http://dagblog.com ouch http://dagblog.com/comment/109781#comment-109781 <a id="comment-109781"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/109779#comment-109779">With the old saw “be careful</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>ouch</p></div></div></div> Thu, 10 Mar 2011 17:33:05 +0000 Flavius comment 109781 at http://dagblog.com With the old saw “be careful http://dagblog.com/comment/109779#comment-109779 <a id="comment-109779"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/now-i-get-it-9340">NOW I GET IT</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>With the old saw “be careful what you wish for” in mind, I caution “Union worker, beware the Ides of March.”</p><p>(Reuters 3/15/2011: “Obama Visits Wisconsin. Meets With Republicans”)</p><p>President Obama flew to Madison, Wisconsin to meet separately with feuding Republicans and Democrats. The President made a stirring speech to the assembled crowd in Madison’s town center. He emphasized the theme that the union movement was all about cooperation for the greater good and pledged to take that “union spirit” with him to his meetings with Republicans. He then spent several hours in closed door conversations with Republican leaders including Governor Walker. Late this afternoon a White House spokesman reported that the President had “completed another successful compromise with Republicans.” The details were not provided but the spokesman summarized the results. “Governor Walker and the Republicans will be allowed to pass their legislation. The Democratic senators will be allowed to continue to receive their pay checks via direct deposit and therefore will not have to return to the state – ever.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 10 Mar 2011 17:26:49 +0000 LarryH comment 109779 at http://dagblog.com yeah http://dagblog.com/comment/109777#comment-109777 <a id="comment-109777"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/109764#comment-109764">Dude. You are kicking ass -</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>yeah</p></div></div></div> Thu, 10 Mar 2011 17:20:30 +0000 Flavius comment 109777 at http://dagblog.com Yup. I think you can only http://dagblog.com/comment/109776#comment-109776 <a id="comment-109776"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/109764#comment-109764">Dude. You are kicking ass -</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yup. I think you can only truly understand politics if you grew up watching the Habs play the Nordiques...</p></div></div></div> Thu, 10 Mar 2011 17:15:03 +0000 Obey comment 109776 at http://dagblog.com