dagblog - Comments for "Blogger to rewrite Holy Bible because it serves him poorly: &quot;It&#039;s a masturbatory issue&quot;" http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/blogger-rewrite-holy-bible-because-it-serves-him-poorly-its-masturbatory-issue-935 Comments for "Blogger to rewrite Holy Bible because it serves him poorly: "It's a masturbatory issue"" en Hey, it worked for Paul. http://dagblog.com/comment/8692#comment-8692 <a id="comment-8692"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/8691#comment-8691">Thanks, ya&#039;ll. All those</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hey, it worked for Paul.</p></div></div></div> Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:30:47 +0000 DF comment 8692 at http://dagblog.com Thanks, ya'll. All those http://dagblog.com/comment/8691#comment-8691 <a id="comment-8691"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/blogger-rewrite-holy-bible-because-it-serves-him-poorly-its-masturbatory-issue-935">Blogger to rewrite Holy Bible because it serves him poorly: &quot;It&#039;s a masturbatory issue&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks, ya'll. All those hours of endlessly sticking Jesus into all my blog posts is finally paying off! ;)</p></div></div></div> Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:20:06 +0000 William K. Wolfrum comment 8691 at http://dagblog.com Indeed, 2 points for the http://dagblog.com/comment/8682#comment-8682 <a id="comment-8682"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/8680#comment-8680">Nice work, wolfie.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Indeed, 2 points for the wolfman</p></div></div></div> Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:18:37 +0000 Larry Jankens comment 8682 at http://dagblog.com Nice work, wolfie. http://dagblog.com/comment/8680#comment-8680 <a id="comment-8680"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/8675#comment-8675">FYI, one of your posts has</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Nice work, wolfie.</p></div></div></div> Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:01:24 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 8680 at http://dagblog.com By more, I assume you mean http://dagblog.com/comment/8678#comment-8678 <a id="comment-8678"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/8677#comment-8677">While you&#039;re updating: could</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>By more, I assume you mean more pictures (with less clothing), right?</p> <p>After all, it would be <a target="_blank" title="FOX News uses sex segments" href="http://www.newshounds.us/2007/11/07/fox_news_uses_sex_segments_to_divert_outrage_from_the_real_obscenity_the_war.php">par for the course with the right wing</a>.</p></div></div></div> Tue, 06 Oct 2009 19:26:00 +0000 Nebton comment 8678 at http://dagblog.com While you're updating: could http://dagblog.com/comment/8677#comment-8677 <a id="comment-8677"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/blogger-rewrite-holy-bible-because-it-serves-him-poorly-its-masturbatory-issue-935">Blogger to rewrite Holy Bible because it serves him poorly: &quot;It&#039;s a masturbatory issue&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>While you're updating: could there be more about the woman who's about to be stoned for adultery? Because the KJV has almost nothing about what she's wearing.</p></div></div></div> Tue, 06 Oct 2009 19:19:25 +0000 Doctor Cleveland comment 8677 at http://dagblog.com FYI, one of your posts has http://dagblog.com/comment/8675#comment-8675 <a id="comment-8675"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/blogger-rewrite-holy-bible-because-it-serves-him-poorly-its-masturbatory-issue-935">Blogger to rewrite Holy Bible because it serves him poorly: &quot;It&#039;s a masturbatory issue&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>FYI, <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/9r8zc/jesus_christ_quits_christianity_after_viewing/">one of your posts has made the front page of reddit</a>.  Prepare for an onslaught of traffic.</p></div></div></div> Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:55:00 +0000 DF comment 8675 at http://dagblog.com You've run headlong into http://dagblog.com/comment/8669#comment-8669 <a id="comment-8669"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/8662#comment-8662">So, I visited your</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You've run headlong into <a href="http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/Poe%27s_Law">Poe's Law</a>.</p></div></div></div> Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:54:00 +0000 DF comment 8669 at http://dagblog.com FOX News' "media critic" http://dagblog.com/comment/8664#comment-8664 <a id="comment-8664"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/blogger-rewrite-holy-bible-because-it-serves-him-poorly-its-masturbatory-issue-935">Blogger to rewrite Holy Bible because it serves him poorly: &quot;It&#039;s a masturbatory issue&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>FOX News' "media critic" Bernard Goldberg: <a href="http://www.newshounds.us/2009/03/18/bernard_goldberg_complains_about_the_liberal_bias_in_oreillys_dictionary.php">The dictionary is written by some liberal person.</a></p> <p>PS For the edification of our readers, here's the first few paragraphs of the <a href="http://www.conservapedia.com/Barack_Obama">Obama entry </a>in <a href="http://www.conservapedia.com">Conservapedia</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Barack Hussein Obama II aka Barry Soetoro (allegedly born in Honolulu Aug. 4, 1961) is the 44th President of the United States, and previously served as a first-term Democratic Senator from Illinois (2005-2008). Obama and his running mate Senator Joseph Biden won the presidential election after 23 months of campaigning that spent over $700 million, much of it raised from undisclosed or fraudulent donors. Obama spent far more per vote than McCain did: Obama spent $7.39 per vote, while McCain spent only $5.78 per vote.</p> <p>As President Obama has pushed for establishing a Palestinian state over the objection of Israel's Prime Minister, inclusion of Turkey in the European Union and holding Guantanamo detainees indefinitely without trial.</p> <p>Obama's budget and stimulus bill advanced his socialist idea of "spreading the wealth."  His health care plan would force employers to purchase health care or pay a fine and will force many into a poorly run single payer system. To announce his trip to Berlin in July 2008, Obama used posters which show a marked similarity to posters of Lenin and Che Guevara. During Obama's youth in Hawaii, he developed a strong, almost Father/Son relationship with Frank Marshall Davis, a high level Communist Party functionary while Obama has stated that his favorite professors in school were themselves Marxists.</p> <p>Obama has stated, "We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."</p> <p>Catholic Archbishop Charles Chaput of Denver, where Obama was nominated for president, criticized Obama as the "most committed" abortion-supporting candidate "since the Roe v. Wade abortion decision in 1973." Obama said "the first thing I'd do as President is sign the Freedom of Choice Act." It "would invalidate virtually all state and federal limitations on abortion, and would make partial-birth abortion legal again."</p> <p>The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons observed that Obama used techniques of mind control in his campaign, as in this speech: "a light will shine down from somewhere, it will light upon you, you will experience an epiphany, and you will say to yourself, 'I have to vote for Barack.'"</p> </blockquote></div></div></div> Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:18:07 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 8664 at http://dagblog.com So, I visited your http://dagblog.com/comment/8662#comment-8662 <a id="comment-8662"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/blogger-rewrite-holy-bible-because-it-serves-him-poorly-its-masturbatory-issue-935">Blogger to rewrite Holy Bible because it serves him poorly: &quot;It&#039;s a masturbatory issue&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>So, I visited your links.</p> <p>It's getting really hard to tell the difference between the right-wing and a parody of the right-wing. I keep hoping that it'll turn out that Coulter, Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck, etc. were all just participating in a very long version of a <a target="_blank" title="Shaggy dog story" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaggy_dog_story">shaggy dog story</a>.</p></div></div></div> Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:46:22 +0000 Nebton comment 8662 at http://dagblog.com