dagblog - Comments for "Japanese nuclear reactor in peril" http://dagblog.com/link/japanese-nuclear-reactor-peril-9364 Comments for "Japanese nuclear reactor in peril" en Japan rates nuclear accident http://dagblog.com/comment/110103#comment-110103 <a id="comment-110103"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/japanese-nuclear-reactor-peril-9364">Japanese nuclear reactor in peril</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote><p><a href="%20http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/12/japan-quake-rating-idUSTKZ0068020110312">Japan rates nuclear accident less serious than 3 Mile Island, Chernobyl</a><br /><br />March 13 | Sat Mar 12, 2011 10:56am EST<br /><br />March 13 (Reuters) - A nuclear accident in Japan on Saturday rates as less serious than both the Three Mile Island accident in 1979 and the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear disaster, Japan's nuclear safety agency said.<br /><br />An official at the agency said it has rated the incident at Tokyo Electric Power's nuclear plant north of Tokyo a 4 according to the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale (INES) .<br /><br />Three Mile Island was rated 5 while Chernobyl was rated 7 on the 1 to 7 scale, the official said....</p></blockquote></div></div></div> Sat, 12 Mar 2011 16:20:49 +0000 artappraiser comment 110103 at http://dagblog.com Japan Orders Evacuation Near http://dagblog.com/comment/110063#comment-110063 <a id="comment-110063"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/japanese-nuclear-reactor-peril-9364">Japanese nuclear reactor in peril</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/12/world/asia/12nuclear.html">Japan Orders Evacuation Near 2nd Nuclear Plant</a><br />By Matthew L. Wald, <em>New York Times</em>, March 11, 2011<br /><br />.....The power plants, known as Daiichi and Daini and operated by Tokyo Electric Power, experienced critical failures of the cooling systems after the plants were shut down, as they were during the quake.<br /><br />About 45,000 people were affected by the evacuation order at the Daiichi plant, where those living within a six-mile radius were told to leave. The evacuation of the second plant was for a one-mile radius because “there is no sign that radiation has been emitted outside,” an official said.....<br /><br />....Nuclear safety officials focused initially on the Daiichi plant. But by Saturday morning Japan had declared states of emergency for five reactors at the two plants, an escalation that added to worries about the safety of nuclear facilities in the quake-prone Japanese islands.<br /><br />The Daiichi and Daini plants are 10 miles apart in Fukushima Prefecture, about 150 miles north of Tokyo and close to the quake’s epicenter off the coast.<br /><br />The plants’ problems were described as serious but were far short of a catastrophic emergency like the partial core meltdown that occurred at the Three Mile Island plant near Harrisburg, Pa., in 1979.<br /><br />A Japanese nuclear safety panel said the radiation levels were 1,000 times above normal in a reactor control room at the Daiichi plant. Some radioactive material had also seeped outside, with radiation levels near the main gate measured at eight times normal, NHK, Japan’s public broadcaster, quoted nuclear safety officials as saying...</p></blockquote></div></div></div> Sat, 12 Mar 2011 06:36:21 +0000 artappraiser comment 110063 at http://dagblog.com Japan says meltdown possible http://dagblog.com/comment/110058#comment-110058 <a id="comment-110058"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/japanese-nuclear-reactor-peril-9364">Japanese nuclear reactor in peril</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote><p>Japan says meltdown possible at nuclear plant<br /><br />By Jay Alabaster, <em>Associated Press</em>, 12:40 a.m. Saturday, March 12, 2011<br /><br />TOKYO — An official with Japan's nuclear safety commission says that a meltdown at nuclear power plant affected by the country's massive earthquake is possible.<br /><br />Ryohei Shiomi said Saturday that officials were checking whether a meltdown had taken place at the Fukushima Dai-ichi power plant, which had lost cooling ability in the aftermath of Friday's powerful earthquake.<br /><br />Shiomi said that even if there was a meltdown, it wouldn't affect humans within a six-mile (10-kilometer) radius....<br /><br /><a href="http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/japan-says-meltdown-possible-869316.html">http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/japan-says-meltdown-possible-869316...</a></p></blockquote></div></div></div> Sat, 12 Mar 2011 05:49:25 +0000 artappraiser comment 110058 at http://dagblog.com "When a fail safe system http://dagblog.com/comment/110035#comment-110035 <a id="comment-110035"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/japanese-nuclear-reactor-peril-9364">Japanese nuclear reactor in peril</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>"When a fail safe system fails, it will always fail by failing to fail safe"</p></div></div></div> Sat, 12 Mar 2011 03:07:11 +0000 cmaukonen comment 110035 at http://dagblog.com BBC World just said the http://dagblog.com/comment/110012#comment-110012 <a id="comment-110012"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/japanese-nuclear-reactor-peril-9364">Japanese nuclear reactor in peril</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>BBC World just said the Japanese government has ordered evacuation within 6 miles of the plant.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:36:45 +0000 artappraiser comment 110012 at http://dagblog.com Realtime results for http://dagblog.com/comment/110010#comment-110010 <a id="comment-110010"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/japanese-nuclear-reactor-peril-9364">Japanese nuclear reactor in peril</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Realtime results for Fukushima, the tweets are racing:</p><p><a href="http://twitter.com/search/%23japon#search?q=Fukushima">http://twitter.com/search/%23japon#search?q=Fukushima</a></p><p>It's going to be interesting see what happens with Twitter on a topic like this. I am thinking  along the lines of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_War_of_the_Worlds_%28radio_drama%29">Orson Welles' <em>War of the Worl</em>ds radio broadcast.</a> I am wondering whether governments will have to compete with Twitter as to urgency and with complete transparency if they are to prevent panic.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:31:03 +0000 artappraiser comment 110010 at http://dagblog.com