dagblog - Comments for "Merkel shuts down seven nuclear reactors" http://dagblog.com/link/merkel-shuts-down-seven-nuclear-reactors-9416 Comments for "Merkel shuts down seven nuclear reactors" en One of the concerns about http://dagblog.com/comment/110580#comment-110580 <a id="comment-110580"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/110568#comment-110568">Are earthquakes and tsunamis</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>One of the concerns about Chernobyl was in the event of a power grid failure, external power would not have been immediately available to run the plant's cooling water pumps...exactly what's happened in Japan. And why I suspect Merkel is drawing down those older nuclear power plants...make damn sure there's plenty of power available immediately without hesitation so they don't experience catastrophic failure like Chernobyl and Japan.</p><p>As to your question, the best I can figure out, cooling is the biggest problem so far :</p><p><span style="font-size: small;"><strong>3-mile island</strong></span> - On March 28, 1979, there was a <a title="Nuclear safety systems" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_safety_systems#Emergency_Core_Cooling_System">cooling system</a> malfunction that caused a partial <a title="Nuclear meltdown" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_meltdown">melt-down</a> of the <a title="Nuclear reactor core" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_reactor_core">reactor core</a>.</p><p><strong>Chernobyl</strong> - The disaster began during a systems test on 26 April 1986 at reactor number four of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl">Chernobyl</a> plant, which is near the town of <a title="Pripyat (city)" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pripyat_%28city%29">Pripyat</a>. There was a sudden power output surge, and when an emergency shutdown was attempted, a more extreme spike in power output occurred, which led to a reactor vessel rupture and a series of <a title="Explosion" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explosion">explosions</a>.</p><p>The wikipedia artile is more indepth...keep in mind this was during the cold war so info is at best ballpark variety</p><p>url - <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_disaster">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_disaster</a></p><p> </p><p> </p></div></div></div> Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:34:03 +0000 Beetlejuice comment 110580 at http://dagblog.com For designs where the coolant http://dagblog.com/comment/110570#comment-110570 <a id="comment-110570"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/110567#comment-110567">She&#039;s just playing to the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>For designs where the coolant doubles as the moderator, if you lose the coolant, you also lose the moderator (meaning the reaction stops). Of course, you still have to worry about the existing heat, but at least you don't have a run-away nuclear reaction!</p></div></div></div> Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:49:14 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 110570 at http://dagblog.com Are earthquakes and tsunamis http://dagblog.com/comment/110568#comment-110568 <a id="comment-110568"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/110567#comment-110567">She&#039;s just playing to the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Are earthquakes and tsunamis the only things that can go wrong, or the first things that have happened so far?</p></div></div></div> Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:45:00 +0000 Donal comment 110568 at http://dagblog.com She's just playing to the http://dagblog.com/comment/110567#comment-110567 <a id="comment-110567"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/merkel-shuts-down-seven-nuclear-reactors-9416">Merkel shuts down seven nuclear reactors</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>She's just playing to the audience. </p><p>If you think about it, the nuclear reactors in Japan didn't have a problem. They were working as expected without a problem until the earthquake which set into motion a chain of events that causes the <strong><em>oh shit</em></strong> moments we're witnessing...the earthquake and tsunami didn't cause any direct damage to the reactors. As I understand it, the problem with the reactors was the result of loosing external electrical power, main and back-up, to keep pumping water into the reactor to keep it cool.</p><p>Germans are extremely efficient so there's little to worry about. I suspect they're just reviewing their power back-up planning to validate there would be ample power resources available in short order if a catastrophe, like Japan's, ever occurred. Besides, when was the last time Germany had to worry about powerful earthquakes, other than old underground, abandoned coal mines collapsing? or tsunamis? Think of it as soothing those with the <em>Chicken Little Complex</em>...the sky is falling!!! the sky is falling !!!</p></div></div></div> Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:43:02 +0000 Beetlejuice comment 110567 at http://dagblog.com