dagblog - Comments for "Unusually deadly US drone strike kills 38 near Afghan border; Pakistani officials argue over dead" http://dagblog.com/link/unusually-deadly-us-drone-strike-kills-38-near-afghan-border-pakistani-officials-argue-over-dea Comments for "Unusually deadly US drone strike kills 38 near Afghan border; Pakistani officials argue over dead" en Thanks for putting the Times http://dagblog.com/comment/110842#comment-110842 <a id="comment-110842"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/110829#comment-110829">Now the NYT is reporting that</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks for putting the Times update. I could tell when I posted it that all 3 were basically repeating like a Pakistani government press conference, but I couldn't find  anything else published yet, and is why I ended up looking at all 3. I even went to Dawn (the Pakistan paper), and though they had headlined it on their website, it was only the Reuters piece.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:56:20 +0000 artappraiser comment 110842 at http://dagblog.com You, and, by extension, the http://dagblog.com/comment/110834#comment-110834 <a id="comment-110834"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/110829#comment-110829">Now the NYT is reporting that</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You, and, by extension, the Times, clearly did not get the memo.</p><p>It is only<strong> after</strong> the drone strike that the affiliation and culpability of the dead can be accurately assessed.</p><p>Without regard to age, sex, affiliation or ideology, and without exception:  Anyone killed or wounded by a drone strike is , <em>ipso facto</em>, an insurgent/terrorist/talib/ or a relative/sympathizer/associate thereof.</p><p>I hope this clarifies the issue. You are very welcome.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:07:31 +0000 jollyroger comment 110834 at http://dagblog.com Now the NYT is reporting that http://dagblog.com/comment/110829#comment-110829 <a id="comment-110829"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/unusually-deadly-us-drone-strike-kills-38-near-afghan-border-pakistani-officials-argue-over-dea">Unusually deadly US drone strike kills 38 near Afghan border; Pakistani officials argue over dead</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Now the NYT is reporting that it was a meeting to haggle over profits from a chromite mine and over half were tribal elders and civilians, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/18/world/asia/18pakistan.html?hp" target="_blank">Drone Attack Kills Civilians</a>. In the failed and/or corrupt to the core states of Pakistan as well as Afghanistan, the Taliban act as the legal system for local disputes. If the NYT piece is true one has to wonder if the next meeting will be to plan 'the next 9/11' instead of division of booty from a local mine.</p><p>Anyone who believes killer drones are going to make any difference at all in the final outcome of the regional conflict is nuts. Someday the drones will be gone, but the Taliban will still be there, in force, and on a mission from God or Mullah (fill in the blank).</p></div></div></div> Thu, 17 Mar 2011 20:55:40 +0000 NCD comment 110829 at http://dagblog.com