dagblog - Comments for "What's new ?"

I really do not believe that

cmaukonen — Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:32:53 +0000

I really do not believe that there would be to many (if nay) in congress during the 1950s and 60s that would approve of Wall Streets shenanigans. The verbiage we are hearing are personal attacks couched and thinly veiled in political rhetoric. I am amazed there has not been an out and out bar room brawl break out in congress.

The last truly honest thing I think was uttered in those hallowed halls was when Cheney gave the F-Bomb and finger to someone. The guy's a complete ass and total slime but it it was real. And this is going on on both sides of the fence.

On the money Smity. While

Tommy Holmes — Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:13:42 +0000

In reply to What's new ?

On the money Smity. While change is good, your list points out that there are some changes that are not.

Cogito ergo doleo.

kyle flynn — Fri, 18 Mar 2011 05:41:52 +0000

In reply to What's new ?

Cogito ergo doleo.

Cogitationis poenam nemo

kyle flynn — Fri, 18 Mar 2011 05:37:57 +0000

In reply to Now Dickie Cheney thought we

Cogitationis poenam nemo patitur.

Now Dickie Cheney thought we

Richard Day — Fri, 18 Mar 2011 05:22:35 +0000

In reply to Richard Nixon would have

Now Dickie Cheney thought we would be welcomed in Iraq cum rosae. Right?

Richard Nixon would have

jollyroger — Fri, 18 Mar 2011 05:13:18 +0000

In reply to What's new ?

Richard Nixon would have supported Obama.

Yes and no-he did say "if the president does it, it must be legal", but I'm not sure he would have gone for outright assasination (cf. Awlaki)--Nixon had the decency to insist that murder be done sub rosa