dagblog - Comments for "Anti-war liberals shoot us in the foot." http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/anti-war-liberals-shoot-us-foot-9496 Comments for "Anti-war liberals shoot us in the foot." en Sad how much they play us for http://dagblog.com/comment/111878#comment-111878 <a id="comment-111878"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/111831#comment-111831">Just because I was skeptical</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Sad how much they play us for suckers even when we try to give them the benefit of the doubt.</p><p>But even sadder to think these same people probably wouldn't support a peaceful protest in the US because it would threaten the sanctity and stability of a bank somewhere.</p><p>(At least that was the attitude both in Bahrain and the US (Wall Street) bailout)</p></div></div></div> Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:34:33 +0000 Desider comment 111878 at http://dagblog.com Just because I was skeptical http://dagblog.com/comment/111831#comment-111831 <a id="comment-111831"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/111829#comment-111829">Ha, and then Gates says, &quot;no</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Just because I was skeptical that anyone could be <em>that</em> tone deaf, I had to ask the holy Google if you were just messing with me. Alas, <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110323/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_us_libya_gates_1">you were not</a>.</p><blockquote><p>Gates says no one thought the assault would last only two or three weeks, but he could not say how the coalition operation might be resolved.</p></blockquote></div></div></div> Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:30:00 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 111831 at http://dagblog.com Ha, and then Gates says, "no http://dagblog.com/comment/111829#comment-111829 <a id="comment-111829"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/111816#comment-111816">Starting to understand &quot;hope,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Ha, and then Gates says, "no one thought this would be done in 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks...."</p></div></div></div> Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:25:35 +0000 Desider comment 111829 at http://dagblog.com Starting to understand "hope, http://dagblog.com/comment/111816#comment-111816 <a id="comment-111816"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/111805#comment-111805">How long do you envision this</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Starting to understand "hope, then change..."</p></div></div></div> Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:39:41 +0000 Desider comment 111816 at http://dagblog.com How long do you envision this http://dagblog.com/comment/111805#comment-111805 <a id="comment-111805"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/111533#comment-111533">How long do you envision this</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote><p>How long do you envision this going on? We aren't invading anyone. The event horizon given is "days, not weeks".</p></blockquote><p>It seems that <a href="http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,14940498,00.html">we're already shifting to "weeks, not months"</a>. I hope that's the last shift.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:49:19 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 111805 at http://dagblog.com BTW: >1500 glorious http://dagblog.com/comment/111696#comment-111696 <a id="comment-111696"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/111679#comment-111679">Personally, I&#039;m loving how</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>BTW: &gt;1500 glorious views!!1!1!!!!!!</p><p>:-)</p></div></div></div> Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:39:46 +0000 kgb999 comment 111696 at http://dagblog.com Despite your consistent http://dagblog.com/comment/111694#comment-111694 <a id="comment-111694"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/111679#comment-111679">Personally, I&#039;m loving how</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Despite your consistent assertions to the contrary, words have <a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/invasion">specific meaning</a>. That's the mechanism by which language is employed to convey ideas without confusion.</p><p>If those kids used a potato gun and shot out all your windows or dropped grenades down your chimney but never tried to enter your home, it would not be a home invasion it would be an <a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/assault?show=0&amp;t=1300911440">assault</a> or an <a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attack">attack</a>.</p><p>If you want to oppose the intervention entirely, fine. If you just want to bitch because the US didn't sit out (thereby increasing the likelihood Canadians would be killed as they enthusiastically enforce the no-fly zone their government pushed for), fine. But at least be intellectually honest about the situation you are opposing.</p><p>I find it difficult to believe you are genuinely ignorant of linguistics or confused over the meaning of words ... playing dumb is a shitty way to advance an argument.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:28:43 +0000 kgb999 comment 111694 at http://dagblog.com UN resolutions are very http://dagblog.com/comment/111688#comment-111688 <a id="comment-111688"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/111674#comment-111674">Let&#039;s just say Resolution</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>UN resolutions are very carefully crafted, down to the placement of commas. There are agreed meanings for such words as "reiterating, recalling, noting, urging, demanding, ordering," etc.</p> <p>Bush, Cheney and a reluctant Colin Powell wanted (and legally needed) Security Council authority for an invasion. They very explicitly didn't get it. Res. 1441 says the Council "remains seized of the matter," i.e. we'll decide where this goes from here. Secretary-General Kofi Annan bluntly stated in 2004 the war in Iraq was an "illegal act that contravened the UN charter." In less polite terms, a war crime.</p> <p>The U.S. claimed to be acting to enforce the will of the UN but, like the claim of WMDs, that was a lie.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:43:58 +0000 acanuck comment 111688 at http://dagblog.com Have you seen this story? http://dagblog.com/comment/111682#comment-111682 <a id="comment-111682"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/111679#comment-111679">Personally, I&#039;m loving how</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Have you seen <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/23/world/africa/23plane.html?_r=1">this story</a>?</p></div></div></div> Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:16:14 +0000 we are stardust comment 111682 at http://dagblog.com Personally, I'm loving how http://dagblog.com/comment/111679#comment-111679 <a id="comment-111679"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/111673#comment-111673">Not sure what you mean - we</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Personally, I'm loving how "bombing" is somehow not "invasion." Not a comment aimed at kgb, just a general one, on the language. I mean, kids crashing through my front door would be a "home invasion" but if they dropped laser-guided concussion grenades down my chimney (LAZORS!!!1) then it wouldn't be? What would that be? A "home no-fly zone?"</p><p>It's all so confusing.</p><p>And also, <strong>LAZORS!!!1</strong></p></div></div></div> Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:57:43 +0000 quinn esq comment 111679 at http://dagblog.com