dagblog - Comments for "Lost Amidst All Of These Wars..." http://dagblog.com/personal/lost-amidst-all-these-wars-9517 Comments for "Lost Amidst All Of These Wars..." en You have made me curious.   http://dagblog.com/comment/111804#comment-111804 <a id="comment-111804"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/111680#comment-111680">13 Bankers argue the TBTF</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You have made me curious.   What is source of your numbers?</p></div></div></div> Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:47:52 +0000 EmmaZahn comment 111804 at http://dagblog.com It's also possible that, as http://dagblog.com/comment/111735#comment-111735 <a id="comment-111735"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/111720#comment-111720">Could be. I&#039;d be inclined to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It's also possible that, as you say, what they did was immoral and pushed the envelope of aggressive accounting but wasn't illegal.  Enron was dealing in fictions but there's a lot of ambiguity surrounding debt when it comes to bank holding companies and financial services firms.</p><p>I think you're right to look to sources like Barron's, by the way.  My old employer, Forbes, is also excellent when it comes to sticking up for investor interest.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 24 Mar 2011 00:36:55 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 111735 at http://dagblog.com Could be. I'd be inclined to http://dagblog.com/comment/111720#comment-111720 <a id="comment-111720"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/111700#comment-111700">I think a good case has been</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Could be. I'd be inclined to see what Barrons said about it.While Barrons is an uncritical enthusiast for the market economy it primarily defends the interests of the investor. I assume the legality of Lehman accounting depends on whether they actually got rid of certain items at quarter's end without any tangible commitment-to unwind the deal two days later. </p><p>With Enron's having so recently gotten this same thing wrong , if I were Lehman's comptroller I'd have made sure that there was no such arrangement. In writing. </p></div></div></div> Wed, 23 Mar 2011 23:28:18 +0000 Flavius comment 111720 at http://dagblog.com I think a good case has been http://dagblog.com/comment/111700#comment-111700 <a id="comment-111700"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/111699#comment-111699">Fraud is hard to prove if</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think a good case has been made that the accounting at Lehman was totally fraudulent as it was meant to understate the firm's debt at quarter end.  But so far, no prosecutor has been willing to take me up on that.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:25:00 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 111700 at http://dagblog.com Fraud is hard to prove if http://dagblog.com/comment/111699#comment-111699 <a id="comment-111699"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/111685#comment-111685">Sound like Gillian Tett is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Fraud is hard to prove if there isn't any.</p><p>The S&amp;L fraudsters had committed it so they were convicted. </p><p>Gillian Tett wrote what I quoted Since if she were caught lying it would ruin  her  career I'll take her remarks at face value .</p></div></div></div> Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:22:26 +0000 Flavius comment 111699 at http://dagblog.com Thanks for the reality check, http://dagblog.com/comment/111686#comment-111686 <a id="comment-111686"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/111680#comment-111680">13 Bankers argue the TBTF</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks for the reality check, Beetle.</p><p>And this is the crux of my complaint... the banks have given up nothing, including the largesse of future bailouts when they screw up again.  I'm 36 years old and I've already lived through two major banking crises and both involved massive bailouts.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:16:03 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 111686 at http://dagblog.com Sound like Gillian Tett is http://dagblog.com/comment/111685#comment-111685 <a id="comment-111685"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/111672#comment-111672">some bankers have behaved in</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Sound like Gillian Tett is just running some interference; it's not that fraud is hard to prove; it's that they are almost never investigating it!  How do you think over a thousand frausters were put in jail after the S &amp; L debacle?  At least Bush Sr.'s agencies <em>did the freaking investigations!</em></p> <p><em> </em></p></div></div></div> Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:03:51 +0000 we are stardust comment 111685 at http://dagblog.com I'll look for that post. http://dagblog.com/comment/111683#comment-111683 <a id="comment-111683"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/111678#comment-111678">Excellent points.  Though</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I'll look for that post.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:25:26 +0000 Flavius comment 111683 at http://dagblog.com 13 Bankers argue the TBTF http://dagblog.com/comment/111680#comment-111680 <a id="comment-111680"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/personal/lost-amidst-all-these-wars-9517">Lost Amidst All Of These Wars...</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em><strong>13 Bankers</strong></em> argue the TBTF banks should be held to size limits not to exceed 4% of GNP...roughly $570 billion in assets</p><p>Here's where they stood in 2009:</p><ul><li>Bank of America               16%</li><li>JP Morgan Chase             14%</li><li>Citigroup                            13%</li><li>Wells Fargo                         9%</li><li>Goldman Sachs                   6%</li><li>Morgan Stanley                    5%</li></ul><p>That's 6 banks whose assets are  63% of GNP. And since Obama and the FED didn't resolve the 2008 meltdown with their faux-Pecora Commission, there's rumor the flood gates are still wide open and there's nothing to stop another meltdown a few years from now. I wonder how much more assets those 6 TBTF banks will accumulate by then that we taxpayers will have to cough up?</p></div></div></div> Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:21:38 +0000 Beetlejuice comment 111680 at http://dagblog.com Excellent points.  Though http://dagblog.com/comment/111678#comment-111678 <a id="comment-111678"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/111672#comment-111672">some bankers have behaved in</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Excellent points.  Though this is something I want to take up in a separate post... is the goal of work to make enough money so that you can stop working?  If so, what should the tax code look like?  If not, then what is the goal?</p></div></div></div> Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:32:00 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 111678 at http://dagblog.com