dagblog - Comments for "The Mortmain of the Patina" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/mortmain-patina-9658 Comments for "The Mortmain of the Patina" en i guess all I can say is...go http://dagblog.com/comment/113397#comment-113397 <a id="comment-113397"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/113339#comment-113339">Geeez another deep thinker</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>i guess all I can say is...go Butler!</p><p>(with the understanding that a lot of people are making a lot of money from the tournament, none of whom are the players)</p></div></div></div> Sun, 03 Apr 2011 21:04:39 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 113397 at http://dagblog.com Geeez another deep thinker http://dagblog.com/comment/113339#comment-113339 <a id="comment-113339"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/mortmain-patina-9658">The Mortmain of the Patina</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Geeez another deep thinker today!</p><p>I was intrigued by this:</p><p><em>A couple of days ago I was talking with long-time union guy, one who spent a number of years as a negotiator at the collectively bargaining table.  At one point in the conversation regarding the current political situation in this country, he sighed “we were too successful and now too many of our members have become Republicans.”  If the problem is how to bring these particular folks back to the liberal fold, then it means grasping the dynamics of perception and understanding--why does this message and not that message resonate? </em></p><p>I recall when the Teamsters decided to back Nixon. Of course tricky dicky looks like a socialist compared to what the repubs preach today!</p><p>My only point here is that the repubs are attacking unions so violently that a lot of those members are going to come back to the Dem Party.</p><p>My only other small point relates to something that has been on my mind lately.</p><p>There are Yankee fans and Boston fans and Twins fans....</p><p>I know i get caught up in seeing my party as a team.</p><p>Hell, I own no shares in the Twins. Rich bastards normally own these major league teams regardless of the sport (Hats off to Green Bay for sure!)</p><p>When the Twinkies lose this year, I will lose no money. It really will have nothing to do with my life.</p><p>People go nuts over sports when, materially speaking, their lives have nothing to do with sports.</p><p>So the repubs are like the yankees and the dems are like Boston.</p><p>I know i am guilty of cheering too much for My Team.</p><p>But damn, the propaganda spewed out by the repubs is pure filth and threatens my country every damned day!</p><p>How can I get in some huge argument with a dem because environmental standards must be increased to save our water and air when the repubs wish to destroy the EPA altogether?</p><p>How can I get in some huge argument with a dem because publicly financed employment is not being enhanced when the repubs wish to fire all the public workers or put them into poverty level salaries?</p><p>Oh well...</p></div></div></div> Sun, 03 Apr 2011 16:05:05 +0000 Richard Day comment 113339 at http://dagblog.com I don't have a butler, http://dagblog.com/comment/113311#comment-113311 <a id="comment-113311"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/113249#comment-113249">nor do I,  but it seems</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I don't have a butler, either.    ;o)   (Hint: the butler did it!)</p></div></div></div> Sun, 03 Apr 2011 11:11:15 +0000 we are stardust comment 113311 at http://dagblog.com i was going to post this to a http://dagblog.com/comment/113286#comment-113286 <a id="comment-113286"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/113283#comment-113283">(grin.) &quot;Ambivalent but</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>i was going to post this to a blog that has since disappeared, but i think it appropos...can we all regardless of what furry creature we might be classified as by others just get along (and scratch each other's back...without expect the same in return)</p><p><img src="http://thechive.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/cat-saturday-10.jpg?w=500" alt="" width="500" height="632" /></p></div></div></div> Sun, 03 Apr 2011 04:14:29 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 113286 at http://dagblog.com (grin.) "Ambivalent but http://dagblog.com/comment/113283#comment-113283 <a id="comment-113283"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/113265#comment-113265">(No subject)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>(grin.) "Ambivalent but contextual badgers and others":</p><p> </p><p><object data="http://www.youtube.com/v/_lsH-ULFz2Q?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" height="195" width="320"><param name="data" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_lsH-ULFz2Q?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_lsH-ULFz2Q?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /></object></p></div></div></div> Sun, 03 Apr 2011 04:08:01 +0000 we are stardust comment 113283 at http://dagblog.com (No subject) http://dagblog.com/comment/113265#comment-113265 <a id="comment-113265"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/113260#comment-113260">Obey would rather have a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><img src="http://passionweiss.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/furries.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="375" /></p></div></div></div> Sun, 03 Apr 2011 03:01:28 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 113265 at http://dagblog.com Obey would rather have a http://dagblog.com/comment/113260#comment-113260 <a id="comment-113260"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/113248#comment-113248">Brillant. Mortmain: The</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Obey would rather have a humanoid robot; at least that's what Quinn said...Q wants to dance with Badgers...and porn with them, Obey said.</p></div></div></div> Sun, 03 Apr 2011 02:02:11 +0000 we are stardust comment 113260 at http://dagblog.com nor do I,  but it seems http://dagblog.com/comment/113249#comment-113249 <a id="comment-113249"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/113245#comment-113245">And just how many have an</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>nor do I,  but it seems everyone but the two of us does.</p></div></div></div> Sun, 03 Apr 2011 01:19:28 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 113249 at http://dagblog.com Brillant. Mortmain: The http://dagblog.com/comment/113248#comment-113248 <a id="comment-113248"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/113243#comment-113243">Or a post-post-structuralist</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Brillant. <em>Mortmain: The Musical.  </em>Now if we can Selana Gomez to take the lead role....</p><p><img src="http://www.disnology.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Selena-Gomez-Alex-Russo.jpg" alt="" width="272" height="400" /></p></div></div></div> Sun, 03 Apr 2011 01:17:37 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 113248 at http://dagblog.com And just how many have an http://dagblog.com/comment/113245#comment-113245 <a id="comment-113245"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/113216#comment-113216">And just how many have John</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>And just how many have an ipod?  Not stardust...though I did finally <em>see one.  </em>And I did not shoot it on sight.  Tempted, though.</p></div></div></div> Sun, 03 Apr 2011 01:11:54 +0000 we are stardust comment 113245 at http://dagblog.com