dagblog - Comments for "Wisconsin supreme court election" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/wisconsin-supreme-court-election-9715 Comments for "Wisconsin supreme court election" en It's up to Prosser to request http://dagblog.com/comment/114090#comment-114090 <a id="comment-114090"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/wisconsin-supreme-court-election-9715">Wisconsin supreme court election</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It's up to Prosser to request a recount. Which I have no doubt he'll be instructed to do by the Kochs who financed his expensive campaign.</p><p>The disputes  will be referred to a judge chosen by the head of the state supreme court- whom Prosser has referred to as a bitch and has threatened to destroy.</p><p>No doubt there's a route  by which his/her rulings can be referred to the federal legal system and theoretically all the way to the Supreme Court which IMHO will reject it under a  return to its pre Bush v Gore policy of refusing state electoral disputes</p></div></div></div> Thu, 07 Apr 2011 13:24:39 +0000 Flavius comment 114090 at http://dagblog.com Kloppenburg won by 204 http://dagblog.com/comment/113986#comment-113986 <a id="comment-113986"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/wisconsin-supreme-court-election-9715">Wisconsin supreme court election</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Kloppenburg won by 204 votes</p><p> </p><p><a href="http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/119308059.html">http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/119308059.html</a></p><p> </p></div></div></div> Wed, 06 Apr 2011 20:10:19 +0000 Flavius comment 113986 at http://dagblog.com Walker will offer to utilize http://dagblog.com/comment/113982#comment-113982 <a id="comment-113982"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/113970#comment-113970">Okay. so this goes to the WI</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Walker will offer to utilize his experience arbitrating the dispute about government employees right to collective bargaining pointing out that otherwise it will reach the US Supreme Court and we know by now what they'll do.5 to 4.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 06 Apr 2011 18:06:09 +0000 Flavius comment 113982 at http://dagblog.com Okay. so this goes to the WI http://dagblog.com/comment/113970#comment-113970 <a id="comment-113970"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/113968#comment-113968">At noon Kloppenburg had a 220</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Okay. so this goes to the WI supreme court, right? And say, hopefully, Prosser recuses himself. That leaves 3 dems and 3 republicans. Which means ... what, given the inevitable party-line vote?</p></div></div></div> Wed, 06 Apr 2011 17:04:16 +0000 Obey comment 113970 at http://dagblog.com At noon Kloppenburg had a 220 http://dagblog.com/comment/113968#comment-113968 <a id="comment-113968"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/wisconsin-supreme-court-election-9715">Wisconsin supreme court election</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>At noon Kloppenburg had a 220 vote lead with only one precinct missing. It is from rural Jefferson County which Prosser has carried so far by 58 to  42% Jefferson' s precincts average 500, If that applies to the missing precinct Prosser will gain 130 votes leaving Kloppenburg ahead 90 (wow!).</p><p>For Prosser to gain enough to completely overtake Kloppenburg her % of the vote in the missing precinct would have to drop from 42% to 27%  which would be black swan.</p><p>I officially designate Kloppenburg as the winner. Now on the recount.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 06 Apr 2011 17:01:09 +0000 Flavius comment 113968 at http://dagblog.com In a 4 person primary http://dagblog.com/comment/113958#comment-113958 <a id="comment-113958"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/113948#comment-113948">Well you sure got me feelin</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>In a 4 person primary election  Prosser got 55%, Kloppenburg, 25 and the other two candidates 20 between them.. That suggested he should have achieved at least 60% in this election. During the campaign Prosser closely identified himself with Walker.. That seems to have cost him ten points. . </p></div></div></div> Wed, 06 Apr 2011 16:19:39 +0000 Flavius comment 113958 at http://dagblog.com At 11 40 Kloppenburg has a http://dagblog.com/comment/113952#comment-113952 <a id="comment-113952"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/113948#comment-113948">Well you sure got me feelin</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>At 11 40 Kloppenburg has a 200 vote lead with 3 precincts missing.</p><p>1 in Jefferson  which represents about 400 votes. She had 42% of the vote in the rest of the county. If that holds true in the missing precinct that will cut her lead to about 150.</p><p>2 are in Milwaukee. Probably represents about 600 votes. She had 57% in the rest of the county. If she holds 40% in these remaining precincts she would still have the lead statewide.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 06 Apr 2011 15:52:00 +0000 Flavius comment 113952 at http://dagblog.com Well you sure got me feelin http://dagblog.com/comment/113948#comment-113948 <a id="comment-113948"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/113943#comment-113943">At 11am edt Kloppenburg is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well you sure got me feelin better about this.</p><p>I would have felt a lot better if she were winning by a million votes.</p><p>I thought Wisconsin was really mad at Walker.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 06 Apr 2011 15:37:05 +0000 Richard Day comment 113948 at http://dagblog.com At 11 30 EDT Kloppenburg's http://dagblog.com/comment/113947#comment-113947 <a id="comment-113947"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/113943#comment-113943">At 11am edt Kloppenburg is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>At 11 30 EDT Kloppenburg's ahead by 300  votes with about 1500 still missing. </p></div></div></div> Wed, 06 Apr 2011 15:35:31 +0000 Flavius comment 113947 at http://dagblog.com Thanks for the excellent http://dagblog.com/comment/113944#comment-113944 <a id="comment-113944"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/113941#comment-113941">At 11am edt Kloppenburg is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks for the excellent updates, Flavius.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 06 Apr 2011 15:22:57 +0000 Obey comment 113944 at http://dagblog.com