dagblog - Comments for "Attack Of The Rich" http://dagblog.com/politics/attack-rich-9717 Comments for "Attack Of The Rich" en What you write is nothing but http://dagblog.com/comment/114075#comment-114075 <a id="comment-114075"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/attack-rich-9717">Attack Of The Rich</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>What you write is nothing but dead on truth. What has been done was carefully planned. The agenda of the Right is to make government there own personal tool; mostly to be used to further business interests. They wish to disregard the part in the Constitution that spells out the ROLE OF GOVERNMENT; the part that states that of the roles is to PROMOTE THE GENERAL WELFARE. Their idea is to create a government that promotes only THEIR WELFARE. Just look to history. When two of the safety nets were created (S.S. in 1935 and Medicare in 1965) not one Republican voted for either of these programs. The Republicans have been after these entitlements for years. The Right wants to whittle down government to the point where it's only function is to protect and further THEIR interests. Government must work for everyone, not just the one's running it and their cronies. Keep writing folks, hopefully public option still carries enough weight to effect change. We must keep working to get government back to the task of serving the people and out of the hands of special interests.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 07 Apr 2011 03:33:58 +0000 Tommy Holmes comment 114075 at http://dagblog.com Last November, the NYT had an http://dagblog.com/comment/113942#comment-113942 <a id="comment-113942"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/attack-rich-9717">Attack Of The Rich</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Last November, the NYT had an interactive feature where you could reduce or eliminate the budget deficit in 2015 and on to 2030. It really wasn't that hard to eliminate the deficit if taxes were raised, especially on high incomes and the dead rich, and the military spending was reduced.<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/11/13/weekinreview/deficits-graphic.html" target="_blank"> NYT Budget Feature </a>You could go into surplus with small adjustments to Medicare, none to SSec., as long as you were willing to return to Clinton tax rates and cut the war spending.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 06 Apr 2011 17:10:38 +0000 NCD comment 113942 at http://dagblog.com Or Newt.  http://dagblog.com/comment/113962#comment-113962 <a id="comment-113962"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/113930#comment-113930">Now if Nixon were alive</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Or Newt.  <img title="Cool" src="/sites/all/libraries/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/emotions/img/smiley-cool.gif" alt="Cool" border="0" /></p></div></div></div> Wed, 06 Apr 2011 16:33:46 +0000 we are stardust comment 113962 at http://dagblog.com Nice, destor. I think that http://dagblog.com/comment/113960#comment-113960 <a id="comment-113960"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/attack-rich-9717">Attack Of The Rich</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Nice, destor. I think that your approach is best way to frame the liberal economic position.</p><p>The argument that wealth should be redistributed just doesn't appeal to most Americans. Too socialist.</p><p>The argument that deficits don't matter is simply wrong. You can argue that the U.S. should continue to carry a deficit until the economy improves, but that doesn't mean that we can keep growing national debt indefinitely.</p><p>The argument that the rich are conspiring to repress the poor is a bullshit scare tactic.</p><p>But the argument that the rich are selfishly refusing to fulfill their national obligations--that's a winner. Rather than denying the country's fiscal problems, it turns the Tea Party lament on its head. The problems are real. They've been caused by the profligacy of our leaders. It's time to tighten our belts--by demanding responsibility from the people who live in splendor rather than increasing the suffering of the poor.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 06 Apr 2011 16:27:10 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 113960 at http://dagblog.com Now if Nixon were alive http://dagblog.com/comment/113930#comment-113930 <a id="comment-113930"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/113927#comment-113927">Cripes, so would Nixon! </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Now if Nixon were alive today...wouldn't you just love to see the "moderate" Nixon of his presidential years (except in re to trampling on the Constitution, heinously bombing countries we weren't even at war with, being a pioneer innovator in creative demonization of one's political adversaries, and a few other things here and there) and his henchmen duke it out with Norquist and the Koch brothers and other leaders of the drown-the-government-in-the-bathtub brigade for control of the GOP?   </p></div></div></div> Wed, 06 Apr 2011 15:00:39 +0000 AmericanDreamer comment 113930 at http://dagblog.com Cripes, so would Nixon!  http://dagblog.com/comment/113927#comment-113927 <a id="comment-113927"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/113919#comment-113919">If Dr. King were alive today</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Cripes, so would <em>Nixon!  </em></p></div></div></div> Wed, 06 Apr 2011 14:51:43 +0000 we are stardust comment 113927 at http://dagblog.com Yeah, gotta love that Dem http://dagblog.com/comment/113923#comment-113923 <a id="comment-113923"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/attack-rich-9717">Attack Of The Rich</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, gotta love that Dem message machine. This lunatic comes out with a proposal to cut health care outright for the poor, the helpless, the infirm and the elderly, and what do the Dems say?</p><p>"Courageous man!"</p></div></div></div> Wed, 06 Apr 2011 14:42:01 +0000 Obey comment 113923 at http://dagblog.com If Dr. King were alive today http://dagblog.com/comment/113919#comment-113919 <a id="comment-113919"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/attack-rich-9717">Attack Of The Rich</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>If Dr. King were alive today he would be urging his followers to rise up and reject riches for the classes and austerity for the masses.  </p></div></div></div> Wed, 06 Apr 2011 14:31:38 +0000 AmericanDreamer comment 113919 at http://dagblog.com