dagblog - Comments for "Jake Tapper demands everyone apologizes for saying “Druidism is not a real religion”" http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/jake-tapper-demands-everyone-apologizes-saying-druidism-not-real-religion-972 Comments for "Jake Tapper demands everyone apologizes for saying “Druidism is not a real religion”" en Ken Rudin http://dagblog.com/comment/9053#comment-9053 <a id="comment-9053"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/9044#comment-9044">Then we were kindred spirits</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Ken Rudin apologized.</p> <p><a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/200910220026">http://mediamatters.org/blog/200910220026</a></p> <p> </p></div></div></div> Thu, 22 Oct 2009 22:55:39 +0000 Orlando comment 9053 at http://dagblog.com Maybe if the headline was http://dagblog.com/comment/9046#comment-9046 <a id="comment-9046"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/9041#comment-9041">Unfortunately, no one appears</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Maybe if the headline was "Jake Tapper kills three with bare hands"?</p></div></div></div> Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:46:56 +0000 DF comment 9046 at http://dagblog.com I can see only one of two http://dagblog.com/comment/9045#comment-9045 <a id="comment-9045"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/9035#comment-9035">Actually, I thought they were</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I can see only one of two ways to parse his comment.  Either he means that they traffic in both news and opinion and the WH can't tell the difference or he means that the WH was foolish to mistake Fox for a news organization.  If it's case two, I'll agree with him.  If it's case one, I think it's incumbent upon them to specify.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:45:26 +0000 DF comment 9045 at http://dagblog.com Then we were kindred spirits http://dagblog.com/comment/9044#comment-9044 <a id="comment-9044"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/9034#comment-9034">I listened to that as well</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Then we were kindred spirits today.  I have never before today attempted to call in.  Unfortunately, I couldn't get through.  The other thing that pissed me off was listening David Carr indulge in the rank-and-file false equivalence between Fox and MSNBC.  Rudin had to backpedal at one point ("well, not <i>equally</i> outrageous"), but Carr's missive about the ebb and flow of liberal and conservative media during different administrations was patent bullshit.  Fox became the most popular cable network, full stop, during the Bush administration.  That really puts the lie to his line about liberal media supposedly gaining more popularity during conservative administrations.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:42:24 +0000 DF comment 9044 at http://dagblog.com Funny. I index bagdlog under http://dagblog.com/comment/9042#comment-9042 <a id="comment-9042"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/9038#comment-9038">I just love that dagblog is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">Funny. I index bagdlog under "confiscatory taxation." And "crapweasel."</div></div></div> Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:10:18 +0000 quinn esq comment 9042 at http://dagblog.com Unfortunately, no one appears http://dagblog.com/comment/9041#comment-9041 <a id="comment-9041"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/9024#comment-9024">FYI: Do a google search for</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Unfortunately, no one appears to be interested in Jake Tapper. Try Oprah.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:45:40 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 9041 at http://dagblog.com I just love that dagblog is http://dagblog.com/comment/9038#comment-9038 <a id="comment-9038"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/9024#comment-9024">FYI: Do a google search for</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I just love that dagblog is indexed by Google News as a "news" site. Of course, it's more deserving of that label than FoxNews.com, but still…</p></div></div></div> Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:17:27 +0000 Nebton comment 9038 at http://dagblog.com No, now you're thinking of http://dagblog.com/comment/9036#comment-9036 <a id="comment-9036"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/9019#comment-9019">Objectively, your whole post</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>No, now you're thinking of the paladins…</p></div></div></div> Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:15:25 +0000 Nebton comment 9036 at http://dagblog.com Actually, I thought they were http://dagblog.com/comment/9035#comment-9035 <a id="comment-9035"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/9017#comment-9017">I honestly don&#039;t know.  I&#039;ve</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Actually, I thought they were claiming that what Obama took as news was really just their opinion programming (i.e., that "defense" I referred to earlier). That implies (to me) that <i>somewhere</i> they do something other than opinion programming, but it's not necessarily a <i>clear</i> claim to it.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:14:20 +0000 Nebton comment 9035 at http://dagblog.com I listened to that as well http://dagblog.com/comment/9034#comment-9034 <a id="comment-9034"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/9010#comment-9010">I&#039;m listening to them discuss</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">I listened to that as well and for the first time ever wanted to call in to call bullshit. I don't understand how news organizations and journalists come to the defense of Fox. It's so blatantly and obviously not news. I don't object to the existence of Fox. But they are liars. They're not fair. They're not balanced. They don't tell the truth. When I learned about journalism, those were sort of key ingredients.</div></div></div> Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:03:58 +0000 Orlando comment 9034 at http://dagblog.com