dagblog - Comments for "Details of the budget deal" http://dagblog.com/link/details-budget-deal-9761 Comments for "Details of the budget deal" en Yup. and yet a little more http://dagblog.com/comment/114617#comment-114617 <a id="comment-114617"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/114609#comment-114609">Last night was a perfect</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yup. and yet a little more context: take a look at tax expenditures - lost revenue through loopholes that could be closed.</p><p> </p><div class="graph_full"><img title="TE_Fig1_What-are-the-largest-tax-expenditures" src="http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/briefing-book/background/expenditures/images/TE_Fig1_What-are-the-largest-tax-expenditures_1.gif" alt="TE_Fig1_What-are-the-largest-tax-expenditures" width="500" border="0" height="390" hspace="0" /></div><div class="graph_full"></div><div class="graph_full">Close the two capital gains tax-breaks, and the loophole funnelling corporate profits overseas, and <strong>BINGO, you have the needed 78 billion in savings.</strong></div><div class="graph_full"><strong><br /></strong></div><div class="graph_full">But that would be too painful for the wrong people.</div><div class="graph_full">That formula in the WH press release - 'tough choices to live within our means' - is outrageous.</div></div></div></div> Sun, 10 Apr 2011 19:10:56 +0000 Obey comment 114617 at http://dagblog.com Win! the! Future!!! http://dagblog.com/comment/114613#comment-114613 <a id="comment-114613"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/114609#comment-114609">Last night was a perfect</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Win! the! Future!!!</p></div></div></div> Sun, 10 Apr 2011 18:36:34 +0000 we are stardust comment 114613 at http://dagblog.com Last night was a perfect http://dagblog.com/comment/114609#comment-114609 <a id="comment-114609"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/114606#comment-114606">Selective disclosure of cuts</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote><p>Last night was a perfect example of Democrats and Republicans coming together, working tirelessly to hammer out a deal and<strong> making the tough choices</strong> to live within our means.  We all know that we face tough challenges ahead, from job creating and growing our economy, to educating our children and reducing our deficit, and we must continue to work together to achieve those goals and deliver for the American people.</p></blockquote><p>The 'tough choices' of hitting the poor and middle class are a done deal, the no brainer choices of ending the tax cuts on millionaires and billionaires, dead and alive, taxing CEO bonuses, or jailing Wall Street crooks are challenges no one in DC dares even consider or mention.</p></div></div></div> Sun, 10 Apr 2011 18:09:39 +0000 NCD comment 114609 at http://dagblog.com Selective disclosure of cuts http://dagblog.com/comment/114606#comment-114606 <a id="comment-114606"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/details-budget-deal-9761">Details of the budget deal</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/04/09/details-bipartisan-budget-deal">Selective disclosure of cuts in the deal (from the WH blog):</a></p><p>The two sides agreed to cut $13 billion from funding for programs at the Departments of Labor, Education, and Health and Human Services as well as over $1 billion in a cut across non-defense agencies, forcing everyone to tighten their belt. There will be reductions to housing assistance programs and some health care programs along with $8 billion in cuts to our budget for State and Foreign Operations. These significant cuts to the State Department and foreign assistance will mean we will not meet some of the ambitious goals set for the nation in the President's Budget.</p> <p>Our team also went after wasteful spending and earmarked, special interest programs including $630 million in earmarked transportation projects and at least $2.5 billion in transportation funding that is ready to be earmarked. We were able to cut $35 million by ending the Crop Insurance Good Performance Rebate, which gives successful farmers, who have no claims, a rebate for insurance premiums already subsidized by the federal government. In addition to these cuts, we were able to eliminate $30 million for a job training program that was narrowly targeted at certain student loan processors. We also looked to the Defense department for savings, and were able to identify $18 billion in cuts deemed unnecessary by the Pentagon. <strong>These types of cuts are what the American people expect out of their leaders in Washington.</strong></p></div></div></div> Sun, 10 Apr 2011 17:33:29 +0000 Obey comment 114606 at http://dagblog.com The spending deal agreed to http://dagblog.com/comment/114318#comment-114318 <a id="comment-114318"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/details-budget-deal-9761">Details of the budget deal</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The spending deal <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/reid-says-impasse-based-on-abortion-funding-boehner-denies-it/2011/04/08/AFO40U1C_story.html" target="_blank">agreed to Friday night</a> to avert a government shutdown <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/dc-wire/post/sources-budget-deal-includes-dc-abortion-rider-money-for-school-vouchers/2011/04/08/AF3ET24C_blog.html">includes a provision banning the District from spending its own funds to provide abortions to low-income women as well as funding to continue a controversial school voucher program in DC.</a></p></div></div></div> Sat, 09 Apr 2011 13:23:29 +0000 Obey comment 114318 at http://dagblog.com