dagblog - Comments for "Divisions ÷" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/divisions-9774 Comments for "Divisions ÷" en So we are where we are today http://dagblog.com/comment/114758#comment-114758 <a id="comment-114758"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/divisions-9774">Divisions ÷</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>So we are where we are today because we didn't achieve a better standard of living like what was given to us by those who came before because we didn't work as hard as they did to create something of value to pass on to the next generation.</p><p>Interesting idea that has some legs to it. What we have today is the fruition of the change in work ethics we selected instead of following the pattern passed on by other successful generations.</p></div></div></div> Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:10:25 +0000 Beetlejuice comment 114758 at http://dagblog.com We swim in turbulent waters. http://dagblog.com/comment/114709#comment-114709 <a id="comment-114709"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/114698#comment-114698">I think that one thing that</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>We swim in turbulent waters. For some, there are warm currents, for some cold. For some, predators lurk behind every rock, for some, there are calm tides and plentiful foodstuffs, but we are all swimming in the same ocean.  How can there not be division on what to do? What we have lost, it seems to me, is the desire to all strive together for the common good; to be the school of fish rather than individual fishes... or have I tortured the metaphor too much? </p></div></div></div> Mon, 11 Apr 2011 03:39:51 +0000 MrSmith1 comment 114709 at http://dagblog.com I think that one thing that http://dagblog.com/comment/114698#comment-114698 <a id="comment-114698"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/114696#comment-114696">Perhaps conventional wisdom</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think that one thing that we are divided on is what to do about it. But since no one really has a clue, how can we even be divided on that ?</p><p>Rather like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barber_paradox">The barber Paradox</a>.</p></div></div></div> Mon, 11 Apr 2011 02:59:57 +0000 cmaukonen comment 114698 at http://dagblog.com Perhaps conventional wisdom http://dagblog.com/comment/114696#comment-114696 <a id="comment-114696"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/divisions-9774">Divisions ÷</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Perhaps conventional wisdom is unenlightened. How can there be division if everyone agrees the country is divided or if everyone agrees the government is becoming less and less responsive? The population you speak of are Chuang Tzu's fish.</p><p> </p></div></div></div> Mon, 11 Apr 2011 02:53:45 +0000 MrSmith1 comment 114696 at http://dagblog.com Then we are talking baby http://dagblog.com/comment/114674#comment-114674 <a id="comment-114674"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/114673#comment-114673">And yet 75 percent of Tea</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Then we are talking baby boomers and there younger siblings then. Interesting. But these are the first generation to get higher education in any numbers. Also those involved with the civil rights movement and anti war movement.</p><p>To quote Dr. Morbius "How ironic."</p></div></div></div> Mon, 11 Apr 2011 01:22:19 +0000 cmaukonen comment 114674 at http://dagblog.com And yet 75 percent of Tea http://dagblog.com/comment/114673#comment-114673 <a id="comment-114673"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/divisions-9774">Divisions ÷</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>And yet 75 percent of Tea Party supporters are over the age 45 (with 29 percent over the age of 64). I suspect that most of them remember the Cold War--unless dementia has set in. Most of the pro-labor lefties ain't spring chickens either.</p><p>As for the new generation you speak of, I believe that its members tend towards apathy. Blame 'em for ignorance if you like, but don't hold them accountable for the bitter political divisions of recent years.</p></div></div></div> Mon, 11 Apr 2011 01:18:00 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 114673 at http://dagblog.com