dagblog - Comments for "A CANADIAN ELECTION PRIMER" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/canadian-election-primer-9775 Comments for "A CANADIAN ELECTION PRIMER" en You know it is the inside http://dagblog.com/comment/114885#comment-114885 <a id="comment-114885"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/114832#comment-114832">Did I mention that Harper</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You know it is the inside story that grabs my interest!</p></div></div></div> Mon, 11 Apr 2011 22:12:57 +0000 Richard Day comment 114885 at http://dagblog.com SHAMELESS http://dagblog.com/comment/114869#comment-114869 <a id="comment-114869"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/114863#comment-114863">And now this! The auditor</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">SHAMELESS CONTEMPT!! CONTEMPTIBLE SHAMELESSNESS!!! </div></div></div> Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:13:34 +0000 quinn esq comment 114869 at http://dagblog.com And now this! The auditor http://dagblog.com/comment/114863#comment-114863 <a id="comment-114863"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/114860#comment-114860">This post wasn&#039;t intended to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>And now this! The auditor general publicly accuses the government of misquoting her, taking a remark she made in 2010 about decade-old events and misrepresenting it as referring to the G8/G20 funding controversy. These people are <em>shameless!</em></p> <p><em><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2011/04/11/cv-election-weston-ag-fraser.html">http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2011/04/11/cv-election-weston-ag-fraser.html</a></em></p></div></div></div> Mon, 11 Apr 2011 20:31:11 +0000 acanuck comment 114863 at http://dagblog.com This post wasn't intended to http://dagblog.com/comment/114860#comment-114860 <a id="comment-114860"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/canadian-election-primer-9775">A CANADIAN ELECTION PRIMER</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>This post wasn't intended to get into campaign issues, but this -- coming out a day before the party leaders are set to debate -- is just too juicy to ignore:</p> <p><a href="http://www.metronews.ca/Toronto/Canada/article/829129--ag-says-she-can-t-release-controversial-report--page0">http://www.metronews.ca/Toronto/Canada/article/829129--ag-says-she-can-t-release-controversial-report--page0</a></p> <p>Skimming off $50 million for a cabinet minister's riding is probably not that unusual or that big a deal, but the alleged "misinforming" of Parliament is. It especially resonates because the vote that brought down the government on March 25 found it "in contempt of Parliament" -- for precisely the same reason: lying to MPs about an entirely different matter. The Harper government's perceived arrogance in ignoring legalities and bending regulations is one of the biggest knocks against it, and the reason many are so scared about it winning a parliamentary majority.</p> <p> </p></div></div></div> Mon, 11 Apr 2011 20:04:46 +0000 acanuck comment 114860 at http://dagblog.com I liked As It Happens. It http://dagblog.com/comment/114858#comment-114858 <a id="comment-114858"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/114852#comment-114852">Cutting back Radio Canada</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I liked As It Happens. It could get pretty snarky sometimes.<img title="Smile" src="/sites/all/libraries/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/emotions/img/smiley-smile.gif" alt="Smile" border="0" /></p></div></div></div> Mon, 11 Apr 2011 20:01:17 +0000 cmaukonen comment 114858 at http://dagblog.com Cutting back Radio Canada http://dagblog.com/comment/114852#comment-114852 <a id="comment-114852"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/114845#comment-114845">I use to follow Canadian</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Cutting back Radio Canada International was such a short-sighted budget move! For many people, especially expats, it was the only Canadian perspective on the news available where they were. Of course, that was before everyone had a laptop or a tablet.</p></div></div></div> Mon, 11 Apr 2011 19:31:08 +0000 acanuck comment 114852 at http://dagblog.com I use to follow Canadian http://dagblog.com/comment/114845#comment-114845 <a id="comment-114845"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/114841#comment-114841">I may end up voting Liberal,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I use to follow Canadian politics more closely when RCI carried The World at 6 and As it Happens. But they no longer do and have gone to that silly DRM for their shortwave broadcasts. Yes I know I can get both as streaming but it's not the same as I would listen while fixing dinner which I cannot do on the computer.</p></div></div></div> Mon, 11 Apr 2011 19:11:28 +0000 cmaukonen comment 114845 at http://dagblog.com Never happened. That footage http://dagblog.com/comment/114844#comment-114844 <a id="comment-114844"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/114831#comment-114831">And also. ;-)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Never happened. That footage is totally faked. Gaddafi's troops fired on us first!</p></div></div></div> Mon, 11 Apr 2011 19:09:21 +0000 acanuck comment 114844 at http://dagblog.com May makes a good case that, http://dagblog.com/comment/114843#comment-114843 <a id="comment-114843"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/114762#comment-114762">We used to get This Hour Has</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>May makes a good case that, if they could switch the date of the debate to accommodate a hockey game, they could have expanded it to include her. But I agree with the decision to exclude the Greens, along with the Marxist-Leninists, the Marijuana Party, etc. Until you've won <em>at least </em>one seat in Parliament, you're not a national party.</p></div></div></div> Mon, 11 Apr 2011 19:07:48 +0000 acanuck comment 114843 at http://dagblog.com I may end up voting Liberal, http://dagblog.com/comment/114841#comment-114841 <a id="comment-114841"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/114746#comment-114746">I&#039;m rooting for the NDP.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I may end up voting Liberal, but Ignatieff is indeed <em>some</em> kind of error.</p> <p>Two points: As we enter the second half of the campaign, would-be NDP voters are starting to look at the polls and ask themselves if they want to risk wasting their votes. A lot of them, like me, will feel denying Harper a majority is the No. 1 priority.</p> <p>Also, tomorrow's televised debate could really affect the outcome. Three of the party leaders are old hands at this, but Ignatieff is leading his first national campaign; he admits he's a bit nervous. Most pundits and voters will focus on how he performs. It could tip the election either way.</p></div></div></div> Mon, 11 Apr 2011 19:02:36 +0000 acanuck comment 114841 at http://dagblog.com