dagblog - Comments for "Sesquicentennial Of The Conspiracy To Destroy The United States To Preserve Slavery"

This is really attention

Venus — Fri, 29 Aug 2014 22:54:58 +0000

In reply to Sesquicentennial Of The Conspiracy To Destroy The United States To Preserve Slavery

This is really attention-grabbing, You're an excessively skilled blogger. I have joined your rss feed and stay up for searching for more of your excellent post. Additionally, I've shared your site in my social networks Feel free to surf to my weblog: make windows 7 genuine

We should never forget how

P90x Workout — Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:42:56 +0000

In reply to Sesquicentennial Of The Conspiracy To Destroy The United States To Preserve Slavery

We should never forget how many patriots fought, died, were wounded, maimed and disabled while putting down that rebellion so that all of us might live in a united, free republic and one in which slavery is forever outlawed.

Mmm mighty perty.Bet there's

Obey — Fri, 15 Apr 2011 18:22:56 +0000

In reply to And also.

Mmm mighty perty.

Bet there's some perty ferrets in them woods, too, eh...?

You told the story about your

rmrd0000 — Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:00:54 +0000

In reply to Read the thread; I never said

You told the story about your son and the Confederate uniform. I noted my reaction. When you later said that the evnt was a computer role-palying gme, and that you let the impression of your son wearing the uniform go unchallenged, I did feel that you fel there was something to be gained from the statement. Other than referring to your mention the uniform and my reaction to it, your son was not the focus.

When I created the "conversation, I used a theoretic Black Conservative. I did not say "This is the conversation that I would have with your son. I used a Black Conservative because some will put on Confederate uniforms. I did not comment when you brought other aspects of your' sons life (college, etc) into the discussion.

I don't see how to note that you said your son wore the uniform except to say it, but

Hey folks, just back from

acanuck — Fri, 15 Apr 2011 05:58:29 +0000

In reply to Though you're still probably

Hey folks, just back from burning a cop car. Woohoo! Did I miss anything?

It was lovely and incredible;

we are stardust — Fri, 15 Apr 2011 03:12:51 +0000

In reply to If a wooden ball falls in the

It was lovely and incredible; just short of awesome. And of course, because plenty of someones are there to hear it, even if you can't see them... ;o)

Read the thread; I never said

we are stardust — Fri, 15 Apr 2011 03:10:43 +0000

In reply to since my name was

Read the thread; I never said I was in favor of secession, though I did say that it was a highly interesting concept to explore. I still think so. I think you forget what you said about me and my son:

In another discussion on secession, another poster stated that her son had no problem wearing a Confederate uniform. The statement implied that the poster had a definite opinion about secessionand was not an unbiased observer. It was later learned that her son had played a Confederate in a computer role-playing game. There is a big difference between the actual wearing of the Confederate uniform and a role-playing game on a computer. The poster was willing the leave the initial impression. It seems to me that there was some pleasure gained from being provocative. But someone reading the Confedrate uniform statement might interpret as an indication of underlying bias.

But really, it scarcely matters any longer. You have decided to misintepret a lot here, including thinking Des's remarks about black historians: He said great! More perspectives are valuable, and peer review will decide veracity, or something like that. It makes for a very odd discussion, and brings not much light to it when you twist or confuse things. G' night.

If a wooden ball falls in the

kyle flynn — Fri, 15 Apr 2011 03:09:46 +0000

In reply to And also.

If a wooden ball falls in the forest and no one's around to hear it, does it still play Bach?

since my name was

rmrd0000 — Fri, 15 Apr 2011 02:54:59 +0000

In reply to I'm a Slaver; I admit it; and

since my name was mentioned

.....I'm a Slaver; I admit it; and brew and rmrd are probalby peeved some creepy White Woman raised a black son to to be a Confederate-supporting self-loathing black.

if you recall you said that your son didn't have a problem wearing a Confedrate uniform. In Trope's post, You introduced the Confederate uniform. In reponse, I conducted a "conversation" with a Black Conservative who wore a Confederate uniform. I did not refer to your son.

I focused on secession celebrations occuring today, because it does create a two-tier system for how Blacks and Whites would participate. The underlying point was that if secesson was legal, the celebrations sholud be fine.

Because, legal issues were being discusssed and their were complaints of taking heat for defending secession that was occuring in the setting of slavery, I brought up the OJ case. Cochran defended a legal principle for defending Simpson. Cochran was vilified. The analogy was that supporting a legal principle did not prevent heat.

I also noted that secession defenses are nothing new, they have been laid out by members of the Sons of the Confederacy, for example. It is fascinating to hear of the activities that you and the others have been/ are participants, but that does not mean that you are taking the correct position on the issue of secession.

And also.

quinn esq — Fri, 15 Apr 2011 02:47:10 +0000

In reply to Though you're still probably

And also.