dagblog - Comments for "DANGEROUS ATTACKS UPON SUFFRAGE"

Except for Hugo...YES!Oh and

Richard Day — Sun, 17 Apr 2011 06:02:30 +0000

In reply to Now you're catching on,

Except for Hugo...

YES!

Oh and I do have to admit I hate Kardashians too!

This is late and probably

Richard Day — Sun, 17 Apr 2011 05:59:28 +0000

In reply to Sure. Incentives loom large

This is late and probably irrelevent.

But I really feel that the repubs look for a way to individually grasp power. And the dems, for the most part got into the fray from experiencing how the system just fails people.

Are the dems all pure? No.

But are the repubs all tainted? yes.

The repubs never cared...ever!

Now the Black conservatives; supposedly I have no standing to opine. But I will anyway.

Michael Steele was shunned by dems somewhere in the process and said fuck you!

Justice Thomas was really, really shunned by dems somewhere and said fuck you!

Steele still wishes to sound reasonable.

Thomas does not give one good shite. Fuck you! I married a white girl and I got all the mojo to kill everybody in my way.

And yet Thomas has not the guts, has not the courage to openly opine his views. Never. He will not even comment during arguments. He is as bad as the worst white nazi who ever lived.

I despise Scalia...if he died of a heart attack tomorrow I would cheer.

Thomas is everything Obama has ever been accused of and yet he will never ever come to our President's defense. He is truly mentally deranged. He has separated all emotion from any logical conclusion and yet he believes in no logic at all except for his own engrandisement.

And when Bush 41 was confronted; fuck you I will find the most Nazi assed black in the entire world and shove it up your ass!

And that is exactly what a reasonable, moderate repub will always do!

There have been articles over the last five decades claiming the sanctity of certain districts; expecially when speaking of the conservative House Seats and we have seen swings that are out of the realm of the pollsters imagination.

I have no doubt that 25% of this country would go back to lynching Negroes at the drop of a hat.

I have no doubt that 35% of the country would double the prison population at a drop of a hat.

I have no doubt that 40% of the population in this country would limit voting to all those who own land. Even if a strong proportion of that 40% never even owned land.

The repubs aim has always been the same over 70 years or more:

Grab all the minorities you can who can be bribed and put them 'out front'.

Pretend that the republican party will get everyone a paying job.

Cut all taxes for the extremely rich because then the rich will become our friends and help us out in our hour of need.

Keep as many classifications as you can away from the polls--thanks Karl!

Buy up as much of the media as you can to prevent any other messages being distributed to the public. Cut out cable, cut out web, cut out any dissention that you possibly can.

Keep as many folks as you can from any participation in the increases of the economy.

Never ever ever admit mistakes.

Never ever admit that lies were told.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_art_of_war

Never worrry about the state of the economy as it affects the masses; never ever worrry about the health of the masses; never ever worry about the general welfare of the masses.

And always depend upon the Darwinian model; except in cases of the religious right that foments the fears of the masses.

the end

All politicians take an oath

Richard Day — Sun, 17 Apr 2011 05:04:14 +0000

In reply to But surely you can't carry

All politicians take an oath never to take bribes except for Issa of course, and the guy with the frozen money.

I read it in National Review or someplace like that!

My sense of humor is fine.

brewmn — Sun, 17 Apr 2011 04:48:33 +0000

In reply to And you really should see

My sense of humor is fine. You just aren't funny. At least not when you try to be.

What a dishonest response; no

brewmn — Sun, 17 Apr 2011 04:47:01 +0000

In reply to If by pooh-pooh, you mean:

What a dishonest response; no one's challenging your comments here because you "failed to vociferously attack Republicans with great self-righteous fervor;" you're being challenged because you explicitly stated that there was no difference between Republicans and Democrats on the issue of voter suppression.

And while I haven't read your book, you certainly seem to be working double-time to establish your reasonable liberal cred through lame "both sides do it" comments on this blog.