dagblog - Comments for "Bradley Manning&#039;s going to be moved to Leavenworth" http://dagblog.com/link/bradley-mannings-going-be-moved-leavenworth-9892 Comments for "Bradley Manning's going to be moved to Leavenworth" en Nah; it's just control freaks http://dagblog.com/comment/116084#comment-116084 <a id="comment-116084"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/116071#comment-116071">Manning is being held in</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Nah; it's just control freaks running the show.  He had joked about using his zoris to hang himself, and the warden hag put him back on the suicide prevention level that didn't require the shrinks to sign off on it. </p><p><a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Opinion/2011/0112/US-must-rejoin-international-community-by-recognizing-the-state-of-Palestine/%28page%29/2">Greg Mitchell</a> has some run-down on communiques from Manning's attorney, including his concerns about 'treatment decisions' made for him; dunno if that means 'medical' or not.  I watched the hastily arranged <a href="http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2011/04/20/pentagon-plans-indefinite-detention-of-bradley-manning-video-transcript/">press conference announcing it</a>; what a load of manure.  I get that it had to be all excuses, equivocations, and bologna, but it was embarassing.  Jeh Johnson--baaaaaaa!</p><p>Sounded like they might keep him in pre-trial confinement half of forever. </p></div></div></div> Wed, 20 Apr 2011 21:27:12 +0000 we are stardust comment 116084 at http://dagblog.com Manning is being held in http://dagblog.com/comment/116071#comment-116071 <a id="comment-116071"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/bradley-mannings-going-be-moved-leavenworth-9892">Bradley Manning&#039;s going to be moved to Leavenworth</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p>Manning is being held in maximum security in a single-occupancy cell at the Marine base, and he is allowed to wear only a suicide-proof smock to bed each night.</p></blockquote> <p>"A suicide-proof smock?" So that would be, like, a straitjacket?</p> <p>Horrific, appalling and unconscionable. Wouldn't it be more effective to make his conditions less suicide-inducing?</p></div></div></div> Wed, 20 Apr 2011 19:38:02 +0000 acanuck comment 116071 at http://dagblog.com