dagblog - Comments for "Heisenberg, Einstein, and String Theory"

That's less a theory than a

Verified Atheist — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:41:13 +0000

In reply to I have a string

That's less a theory than a law.*

*This is true in both the scientific and common definitions of those two words.

I have a string

cmaukonen — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 02:19:51 +0000

In reply to Heisenberg, Einstein, and String Theory

I have a string theory.

"Cables when left to themselves will always get hopelessly tangled."

If you are still, you might

Richard Day — Mon, 25 Apr 2011 01:36:43 +0000

In reply to I think that might be one of

If you are still, you might not be everywhere, but you sure have traveled millions of miles before your reach puberty!

Dare I ask? Or do I name

we are stardust — Sun, 24 Apr 2011 23:49:28 +0000

In reply to There's a word for people

Dare I ask? Or do I name myself? : Hilarious, Crap-artist, bullshit-geiger-counter, pleasant cynic, unpleasant humorist-cynic, too lame to live, 'gotta love me!', idiot-not-savant, too-plain-spoken-to-be-a-true-obscurist, naive asshat...oh...the list goes on....and on...(please don;t consult my detrators here, of whom there are...shall we say several?

There's a word for people

Anonymous — Sun, 24 Apr 2011 23:22:03 +0000

In reply to You are not meant to. ;o)

There's a word for people like you!

You are not meant to. ;o)

we are stardust — Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:26:42 +0000

In reply to Sorry, I don't quite follow

You are not meant to. ;o)

Sorry, I don't quite follow

Anonymous — Sun, 24 Apr 2011 18:19:50 +0000

In reply to Pretty funny, altogether,

Sorry, I don't quite follow you.

Those are good, but I

Verified Atheist — Sun, 24 Apr 2011 13:48:07 +0000

In reply to LOL! Can't tell if you left

Those are good, but I couldn't help notice that in the first bit of part 3, it seem to take the Earth only 8 minutes to complete about a fourth of its orbit. (The Earth is just over 8 light-minutes from the Sun.) Of course, I also took some poetic license in my "poetry", so who am I to criticize? Also, it would've been really hard to see what they were trying to demonstrate if they had been more realistic, of course.

Actually that is the type of

Verified Atheist — Sun, 24 Apr 2011 13:25:23 +0000

In reply to Perfect, LOL! Almost

Actually that is the type of thing I was asking for. Although he comes off as a wee bit campy to me, the sentiment is genuine and worth pondering, if only for a "moment".

Pretty funny, altogether,

we are stardust — Sun, 24 Apr 2011 12:06:53 +0000

In reply to God again (or rather, for the

Pretty funny, altogether, God. My own thought about 'hard to follows' is that some writers may unconsciously or not, write exactly to be inscrutable. I have been thinking there should be a separate category for that sort of writing, like obscurist.