dagblog - Comments for "The Science of Why We Don&#039;t Believe Science" http://dagblog.com/link/science-why-we-dont-believe-science-9958 Comments for "The Science of Why We Don't Believe Science" en The New Yorker has made http://dagblog.com/comment/117028#comment-117028 <a id="comment-117028"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/116708#comment-116708">Did you read this from the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The New Yorker has made Bilger's article on Eagleman and his studies of "mysteries of the brain" available to all now, just noticed it's #3 on their most popular list:</p><p><a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/04/25/110425fa_fact_bilger">http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/04/25/110425fa_fact_bilger</a></p></div></div></div> Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:26:30 +0000 artappraiser comment 117028 at http://dagblog.com Did you read this from the http://dagblog.com/comment/116708#comment-116708 <a id="comment-116708"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/science-why-we-dont-believe-science-9958">The Science of Why We Don&#039;t Believe Science</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Did you read this from the last New Yorker?</p><blockquote><h1 id="articlehed" class="header"><span style="font-size: small;">The Possibilian</span></h1> <h2 id="articleintro"><span style="font-size: small;">What a brush with death taught David Eagleman about the mysteries of time and the brain.</span></h2> <h4 id="articleauthor"><span style="font-size: small;"><span class="c cs"> by Burkhard Bilger, </span> <span class="dd dds"> April 25, 2011</span></span></h4> <div style="overflow: hidden; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none;"><span style="font-size: small;">Read more <a style="color: rgb(0, 51, 153);" href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/04/25/110425fa_fact_bilger#ixzz1KYjVGMv0">http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/04/25/110425fa_fact_bilger#ixzz1KYjVGMv0</a></span></div></blockquote><div style="overflow: hidden; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none;">(Non-subscribers note: the full article is available free on line.)</div><div style="overflow: hidden; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none;"><span style="font-size: small;">I highly recommend it. There are many related parts to it. Especially how Francis Crick influenced him, in particular this point:<br /></span></div><blockquote><p>Before Francis Crick died, in 2004, he gave Eagleman some advice. “Look,” he said. “The dangerous man is the one who has only one idea, because then he’ll fight and die for it. The way real science goes is that you come up with lots of ideas, and most of them will be wrong.”</p></blockquote><p>and how that relates to agnosticism (open minded) as opposed to rigid atheism (close minded.)</p></div></div></div> Mon, 25 Apr 2011 18:11:08 +0000 artappraiser comment 116708 at http://dagblog.com