Big words for a party that just ate another shit sandwich.

Damage detector Matt Stoller, Harvard product.

Stoller determined in a 5000+ word piece in the Atlantic, "How Post-Watergate Liberals Killed Their Populist Soul".....weeks before the 2016 elections.

Forget that 50 years of liberal failings being summarized as "suicide" and being written a couple weeks before an election, but, how can any serious person talk about American politics during that period without once mentioning "racism" or "racist"? Stoller does it. Harvard pedigree, white male, never held a responsible position in the government or any Party position. He writes stuff. Criticizes people with real jobs, accountable and historic responsibilities.

Does Toller mention racism ever, anywhere? Well yes.

Stoller mentioned "racism" in lauding Ron Paul, in 2011,

Stoller: " (Paul) is also the only prominent politician, let alone Presidential candidate, saying that the drug war has racist origins". No links provided, perhaps because what Paul said was his usual bs.

Ron Paul's great racism recognition moment according to Matt Stoller, is from the 1980's  link, Ron Paul:

"...you know there’s a pretty good case made that this same concept was built in with racism as well. We do know that opium was used by the Chinese and the Chinese were not welcomed in this country,” Paul said. “We do know that the blacks at times use heroin, opium and the laws have been used against them. There have been times that it has been recognized that the Latin Americans use marijuana and the laws have been written against them. But lo and behold the drug that inebriates most of the members of Congress has not been touched because they’re up there drinking alcohol.”

Chinese, Chinese, blacks, Latin Americans and members of Congress. 1980's. No guarantee Paul was not "inebriated" like "most members of Congress" when he said this gem.

A great moment in calling out racism in America? Yes, according to Stoller.

"He and Trump are no different"??? really?

Avenatti was worth his weight in gold dismantling Trump's lawyer relations,
seeing as Mueller couldn't play a public PR role and no one else was holding off the
"Collusion? there was no Collusion" full-court GOP political-media press.
Buh-Bye, Michael Cohen - when it first seemed that Stormy would either get trounced or ignored.

Dems have traditionally been awful on talk shows, giving away the field to the right
even when they aren't packing the shows 3:1 with right-wing characters.
Again, Avenatti was helpful balancing the onslaught.

Avenatti was useful with PR for ICE's pulling kids from immigrants,
and he arguably would have been useful in the Kavanaugh hearing
except the GOP embaragoed most anyone that could testify negatively - 
Blasey Ford being largely the only exception, and they brought in a sawblade
to cut her down in the after-report, even though Blasey Ford did fine on the stand.

If you find Avenatti representing some cause or side of things he shouldn't be,
let me know. But so far he seems to be lined up with the forces of good.
Is it essential that Democrats have to clutch pearls and self-destruct if anyone
raises their head up to high, appears to be forceful and/or effective?
I liked Kamala Harris, but even with her examination, she couldn't manage to
get the ball over the line - you could kind of tell she had Kavanaugh dead to rights,
but she wouldn't effing slam it through, until finally her time was up.
Who fought them taking off the prosecutor once it came out Kavanaugh had July 1
in his calendar that matched the party we were looking for? We rolled over.

Holder didn't have much intelligent to say for 8 years, and when he could have been an advocate for Black Lives Matters, was rather useless. Where was mister tough guy then?

Don't see what this soundbite was supposed to accomplish. Guess there's a sale on macho talk somewhere. Meanwhile, despite all the talk and organizing on Kavanaugh, we still lost. Where was Holder last week? Kicking his heels somewhere?

No, they're not selling to a community sympathetic to BLM.  They're trying to sell a caricature of who white people think black people are; how they think and speak.  It's really too bizarrely awful to take seriously - especially when you consider the super PAC behind it is "Black Americans for the President's Agenda" based out of (this hurts) NC.

I'm almost sorry I'm adding to anyone's knowledge of this absurd outfit.

Still don't see Avenatti "screaming", and he's been awfully quiet of late.