MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
With all of the early prounouncements about what kind of president Barack Obama already has will have been, along with all of the hand-wringing about the future of the GOP, I feel that I have to weigh in on the issue of the moment. What's that you say? Deuteronomy lupus? Lobotomy cupid? I can't understand what you're saying when you talk with your mouth full. Say, what's that you're eating? Gubberman cheese? I'm not sure I've had that variety. Wait, what? "It's the economy, stupid?" Well, I don't appreciate your tone one bit. Besides, I'm trying to talk about the future here.
To that end, allow me to re-introduce George Prescott Bush, son of Jeb and potentially the next, next President of the United States of America. Now, before you say that I'm getting ahead of myself, allow me to get ahead of you by saying that I'm getting ahead of myself. Good, that's out of the way. May I continue, please?
Thanks. Why George P. Bush? Could this handsome fella really be the future of the GOP? Let's take a look at some of the possible factors:
Factor the first: Age. George P. is young. Born in 1976, he'll be 40 in 2016. However, at the tender age of 12 he spoke at the 1988 Republican National Convention that nominated his grandfather. He also campaigned prominently for his uncle in 2000 and, somewhat less prominently, in 2004. Though it has been speculated that his relatively low public profile of late may have had something to do with this military service record during wartime, or lack thereof, rest assured that by 2016 he will have completed his eight year contract as an intelligence officer in the Navy Reserve. If 40 sounds young, let's remember that Barack Obama was just barely 47 this November 4th. Also, if it is true that a generational shift either is occurring or has occurred, then we should probably be willing to entertain the thought that this could potentially be a plus for George P. rather than a minus.
Factor the second: Race. George P. is the son of Jeb Bush and Columba Bush. His mother is from Mexico. George P.'s heritage has already proved popular among Hispanic voters. Also, if Wikipedia is to be believed, he went to high school with Enrique Iglesias. Okay, quit swooning and consider this: The U.S. Hispanic population is the second largest after whites and it is growing. George P. could conceivably enjoy a very comfortable electoral environment in states like Texas, Florida and, quite possibly, California. California's population is one-third Hispanic by recent estimations. If a red California sounds improbable to you, then perhaps you've gotten too complacent with a California that seems perennially blue. When was the last time that California went for the GOP? 1988, when George P.'s grandfather won a ticket to the big chair in the Oval Office. If Barack Obama's election truly marks a break with the past in terms of what the face of political power looks like, then George P. will be in good graces come 2016.
Factor the third: Dynasty. Even in the world's oldest democracy, you cannot discount the role of dynastic power. If you doubt this premise, then I will ask you if the names Adams, Roosevelt, Kennedy, Clinton or, ahem, Bush ring a bell for you. No?! You are hopeless. Have some more cheese. As I was saying, though we'll have to wait and see what the elections between now and 2016 look like, George P. may just be the perfect candidate for a post-Obama GOP. He's the old boy who looks like the new boy.
Factor the fourth: Bush fatigue? As of right now, George P. is a Texas attorney and real estate developer. He's working on his military credentials. He's young enough that he's got time. 2012 is too soon. In fact, 2016 might even be too soon. However, he'll be 48 in 2024. That gives him 16 years to make a name for himself. That's plenty of track to run. His uncle didn't seem to be too hurt by a bit of a late start, but he's got an even bigger advantage in several respects. Perhaps being so young actually works in his favor here by giving him some distance from what appears to be a very dismal conclusion to his uncle's presidency.
So, is George P. Bush the face of the future GOP? I'm going to go ahead and say: Absolutely. That way, if I'm right, confirmation bias will allow you all to think back and say to yourselves, "Damn, that DF was like some kind of blogosphere Nostradamus or, to a lesser extent, Jim Cramer." Either that, or I will be dead wrong and no one will remember this by-then-ancient blog entry.
Comments
I think I just threw up a little in my mouth.
by Orlando on Fri, 12/05/2008 - 1:42pm
This phrase is banned because of overuse. You may, however, use variations, e.g. "I just threw up a little in Dr. Cleveland's mouth."
by Michael Wolraich on Fri, 12/05/2008 - 2:12pm
Don't be too critical, Genghis. You too might soon be throwing up in your own mouth. I think you've gotten a little drunk with your own editorial power. It's only a matter of time before it expels itself (violently, I think) from your system.
by Orlando on Fri, 12/05/2008 - 4:17pm
I have database access.
Will we never be rid of these damn Bushes?
by Michael Wolraich on Fri, 12/05/2008 - 2:13pm
I am confident that, personal vendettas notwithstanding, bitrot and relative obscurity give me a fighting chance!
by DF on Fri, 12/05/2008 - 2:34pm
Barack Obama started his presidency with an economic crisis on his hands and a $1.2 trillion budget deficit hanging over the federal government. Recovery is on the minds of just about everyone, as earlier recovery will mean a return to prosperity and an end to the disdainful status of the economy. That's why Obama and his cash advances are potentially very important, if they do what they're intended to, that is. The good news is that the stimulus does seem to be working. The Commerce Department recently released its report, one of the features of which is a rise in manufactured goods, a key economic indicator. A lot of signs point to the stimulus working thus far and a quicker recovery than previously thought, which is good news. A little debt relief can help the nation with its recovery.
by Roger O (not verified) on Sat, 05/23/2009 - 6:34am
Thanks for the comment. There's also been good news this week for the case for fiscal stimulus in general, but it's coming from China. China was less reticent to funds directly into the sectors that were hurting most, like construction and manufacturing, and as a result China's economy is already in much better shape.
by DF on Sat, 05/23/2009 - 10:20am
Most of you Americans are stupid potically and down right ingrates. Americans lives were saved and prtected by George W Bush like any father would protect his children from anything. The world is safer today because of President Bush. Wake up smell the coffee, give the young Bush the credit he deserve he is serving his country.
by A Canadian Observer (not verified) on Sat, 07/11/2009 - 8:04am
Thanks for commenting Canadian Observer, but we've already filled our quota of wacky Canadian observers. In fact, I was thinking that we may have to pare down the ones we have due to the recession and all. Maybe try www.hillaryis44.org.
by Michael Wolraich on Sat, 07/11/2009 - 10:15am
It is not over ontil the fat lady sings. Just sit back and observe and you may very well see a third generation George Prescott Bush, son of Jeb Bush as the next, next President of the United States of America
by A Canadian Observer (not verified) on Sat, 07/11/2009 - 6:33pm
by Michael Wolraich on Sat, 07/11/2009 - 9:41pm
Nice try, Genghis. As if burying this threat on an obscure outdated thread would escape our notice. We have agents everywhere. You're in clear violation of the North American Free Trade Agreement, and my lawyers are already drawing up the formal complaint. You're in big touble, buster.
We are of course open to a negotiated settlement -- say, one limiting that Eskimo guy to one comment per week. But not because he's Eskimo. No, no, no, heavens no. It's just that he tends to change the complexion and atmosphere of the website. Splashing the other commenters and all.
by acanuck on Sun, 07/12/2009 - 4:39am
your kidding yourself if you honestly believe the words you just said. The war on terror was manufactured for hidden interests, oil. OIL=MONEY
Watch zeitgeist and zeitgeist addendum before you even try to reply to this comment.
by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 09/01/2009 - 12:31am
I have not watched zeitgeist or zeitgeist addendum. Had you included links, I might have clicked them; I'm impulsive that way. On the other hand, maybe I wouldn't have. Anyway, it's been real. Sort of real. Ok, it has not been very real at all. Sorry.
by Michael Wolraich on Tue, 09/01/2009 - 12:54am
You didn't watch zeitgeist (fun fact: zeitgeist literally means "time ghost", although I suppose that's what "spirit of the times" literally means, too…) or zeitgeist addendum, and yet you had the temerity to respond to his comment? What kind of fiend are you?
by Nebton on Tue, 09/01/2009 - 9:02am
If you're really curious, you can watch it here, but you'd better be really curious.
by DF on Tue, 09/01/2009 - 2:44pm
I'm familiar with Zeitgeist. It contains some facts alongside some absolutely wild speculation. Also, oil and money are hardly hidden interests.
by DF on Tue, 09/01/2009 - 2:02pm