The Bishop and the Butterfly: Murder, Politics, and the End of the Jazz Age
    Richard Day's picture

    I FEEL THE EARTH MOVE UNDER MY FEET

    THEEARTHMOVES

     

    Oklahoma has never been known as earthquake country, with a yearly average of about 50 tremors, almost all of them minor. But in the past three years, the state has had thousands of quakes. This year has been the most active, with more than 2,600 so far, including 87 last week.

    While most have been too slight to be felt, some, like the quake on Saturday and a smaller one in November that cracked a bathroom wall in Ms. Sexton’s house, have been sensed over a wide area and caused damage. In 2011, a magnitude 5.6 quake — the biggest ever recorded in the state — injured two people and severely damaged more than a dozen homes, some beyond
    repair.


    You know what tragedy is?

    (At least to me?)

    Tragedy comes when all the people relevant to the context of the story or plot appear to be doing the right thing and bad, really bad results follow.

    I think a pragmatist (a side of the devil to some religious folks) would say:

    Two people died and a dozen homes were 'damaged'? Well a guy was sitting in his home probably having a beer in his living room and watching toothless alligator hunters or his favorite basketball game and a sinkhole swallowed him up into the abyss. And as far as I can tell, this single event did not arise as a result of fracking or drilling or mining or....

     

    We as a nation, according to what I have read over the last couple years, is reaching a precipice in the energy field.

    http://www.governing.com/topics/energy-env/gov-what-happens-when-us-becomes-energy-exporter.html

    We are going to be an oil and gas exporter; we have surpassed China as the leading nation with regard to solar energy, we have experienced a growth in wind energy that is truly monumental (in my humble opinion).

    Neither Oklahoma nor North Dakota nor Texas nor a number of other localities is going to stop this new energy explosion.

    Take wind energy for instance.

    Birds are dying.

    Now someone might point out that birds by the thousands will just fall from the sky.

    http://trib.com/news/opinion/editorial/wind-turbines-kill-birds-so-what/article_ecdcf879-cf3b-5397-add4-ac7a93ecf462.html

    Someone might point out that our buildings destroy thousands upon thousands of birds every year; and I believe this destruction is due to glass windows that fool the poor critters on their trysts around the world.

    I wrote a couple years ago about the horror facing Ohio; a state that like Oklahoma only experienced earthquakes as a result of fracking.

    There are bigger concerns (in my mind at least) with regard to this energy explosion that America is experiencing—even without nuclear power.

    Water is a big frickin deal.

    In the Great Southwest, water is a commodity that has become more and more precious every single day.

    And everything I have read, at least from sources not paid by the oil and gas cartels, informs me that water is being contaminated.

    Where I live, the Allies in WWII can partially credit the Iron Range for our victories in Europe and the Pacific.

    When the powers that be had already extracted the easiest iron ore available over a century or so, the Iron Range began a new technological renovation by providing the country with taconite.

    The problem with taconite was that the sludge remaining from this new method of extraction was being dumped in Lake Superior. As one can imagine, Canada was not that pleased with this new pollution and neither were the states affected by that pollution—at least the states that were not benefiting from this new technology.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taconite

    Fox News over the years has increased its adversity toward wind energy for what reasons I still do not understand except that energy cartels feel threatened.

    Fox News over the years has attacked solar energy as some ridiculous fantasy held by tree hugging liberals; which I do not understand except that energy cartels feel threatened.

    The most important links I have come across that demonstrate the profound effect Solar Energy and Wind Energy appear here:

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/craig-lewis/rooftops-to-deserts-how-p_1_b_4433969.html?utm_hp_ref=energy


    I know that there are hundreds of further links that demonstrate my point, and many of them appear in these other links.

    A book that has been published six months ago regarding this new energy explosion is out of date!

    North Dakota has a very tiny population like Wyoming or Montana and especially when compared to Texas. And now this state has a 2% unemployment rate and the employees are not making $10.00/hr.

    This is a big deal to North Dakota.

    North Dakota wants pipelines and de-regulation and experienced workers and experienced corporate managers and....

    Although trains may carry more energy than pipelines.

    METAPHORS

    Just as a metaphor; South Korea exists and we have to do something about it.

    Iran exists and we have to do something about that.

    Palestinians exist and we have to do something about that.

    And no way, no how are we going to nuke these populations.

    It aint gonna happen.

    So this Administration attempts, with the help of Secretary Kerry and a host of others to deal with the real situation.

    Again, that devilish face of pragmatism.

    AMERICA

    North Dakota aint gonna just lie down and shut down its greatest economic explosion in History.

    Texas and Oklahoma aint just gonna lie down and die.

    http://www.newson6.com/story/14266933/oklahoma-oil-gas-execs-paying-close-attention-to-fracking-study

    Forget the problems of racism and economic disparity and a host of other social issues.

    Economic pragmatism will prevail and the best we can do as a nation is attempt to lessen the harm that will inevitably follow without proper regulation conditioned upon proper observation.

    Pipelines are coming in and with pipelines come the inevitable harm that will ensue.

    Our corporations (which have no national patriotic zeal) wish to take advantage of the Canadian energy explosion.

    And those same corporations wish to take advantage of the new energy explosion being experienced in our own states.

    WE AINT GONNA STOP 'PROGRESS'.

    It just aint gonna happen.

    All the prayers and all the protests and all of the religious zeal we can muster will do nothing to stop progress. And remember, I am not advocating progress even though I call myself a progressive. (Well actually I am really an old time liberal but who gives a damn! hahahahahahahah)

    I do know this.

    There has been more drilling in the Southeast Coast during this 'liberal' Administration than the prior

    Administration.

    There has been more fresh water pollution in this country under the current Administration than the prior Administration.

    http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/press_releases/2013/clean-air-cities-11-07-2013.html

    There have been more pipeline 'incidents' during the term of the current Administration than in the prior Administration.


     

    Now, what is the purpose of this short essay?

    I do not care what Fox News says about the new revolution of Solar and Wind Energy; Solar and Wind Energy are going to be with us for centuries (assuming we last that long).

    I do not care what 'liberal' news sources say about this new revolution in fracking; fracking shall be with us for the next 100 years (assuming we last that long).

    I do not care what other 'outlets' tell us about pipelines; new tech related to transfer of energy sources shall be with us for the next 100 years (assuming we last that long).

    The best we can do is attempt to regulate this new technological explosion and attempt to regulate the implementation of this new phenomena.

    South Dakota is entitled to protection from things being done in North Dakota.

    California is entitled to protection from things being done in the South West that contaminate its water.

    Hell, Iowa is entitled to protection from the sludge that Minnesota might expel into the Mississippi and other waterways.

    Individuals still might prevail with the old legal structures still in place—assuming those individuals do not 'sell out'. And most will sell out.

    Trespass and nuisance actions are still available. You hurt my land and I have state and Federal actions to bring and I can seek damages as well as equitable sanctions against the powers that be that contaminated my land.

    Repubs will simply take the bribes from the international corporations and veto any measure that attempts to regulate environmental pollution.

    And many dems (but not all of them like the repubs) will take the bribes from the international corporations and veto or obstruct any measure that attempts to regulate pollution; pollution of our waters or pollution of our air or pollution of our planet.

    PROGRESS IS HERE.

    GUNS

    We aint gonna get rid of guns because there are too many out there and it is just too goddamn easy to manufacture them.

    That fight is over. The best we can do is attempt to perform background checks and attempt control the sales of WMD's and attempt to curtail the use of weapons by children (prosecuting stupid parents with WMD's) and attempt to 'follow those weapons' when they are involved in crime.

    And the best we can do as a nation is to force or petition our governments to watch over this new corporate energy technological explosion and keep us as safe as we can be.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/13/science/earth/as-quakes-shake-oklahoma-scientists-eye-oil-and-gas-industry.html?ref=science

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/04/02/video-shows-inside-look-at-sinkhole-that-killed-florida-man/

    http://www.governing.com/topics/energy-env/gov-what-happens-when-us-becomes-energy-exporter.html

    http://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/Energy-Voices/2013/1107/Should-the-US-export-oil

    http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/12/13/3061561/trains-north-dakota-oil-keystone/

    http://thinkprogress.org/security/2013/12/05/3029101/hunter-stands-nuke-iran-claim/

    http://trib.com/news/opinion/editorial/wind-turbines-kill-birds-so-what/article_ecdcf879-cf3b-5397-add4-ac7a93ecf462.html

    http://whatreallyhappened.com/content/us-should-nuke-iran-congressman

    http://ezkool.com/2012/03/fact-more-oil-drilling-under-obama-than-under-bush/

    http://www.cbsnews.com/news/has-obama-declared-a-war-on-coal/

    http://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/2013/02/11/north-dakota-oil-boom-driving-economic-development/

    http://www.newson6.com/story/14266933/oklahoma-oil-gas-execs-paying-close-attention-to-fracking-study

    http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/press_releases/2013/clean-air-cities-11-07-2013.html

    http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/12/13/3064661/majority-want-keystone-ghgs/

    http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/fox-news-hates-solar-power/question-1922427/?link=ibaf&q=FOX+NEWS+HATES+WINDPOWER

    http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/10/22/abc-helps-fox-promote-wind-power-hypochondria/196547

    http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/12/13/3064661/majority-want-keystone-ghgs/

     

    Comments

    You know, Mr. Day, whenever someone starts giving me crap about the usefulness of wind energy, I just give them my best Indian Death Stare and say, "Well, Columbus got here with wind power, so what makes you think it can't turn on light bulbs all over the country?"

    I haven't made any new friends in a long, long time.
    I do get the turbine/bird problem. Bald eagles are just recently off the endangered list and it is painful for me to think of the eagles being churned to death just so we don't have to watch teevee in the dark.

    But you know, wolves are just recently off the endangered list as well, and there are killers with guns who cannot wait to get a trophy. Those killers have no conflicts with their rationale. Ramona wrote about this a short while ago.

    Here is my conundrum: If it is "okay" to kill a wolf so that you may decorate your home, why is not "okay" to kill an eagle to light your home?

    My head is confused by this. So is my heart.

    Please do not get me wrong. I do not wish to see any wolves or eagles killed for any reason. But then again, Mr. Day, we all can't live in my own little Native American world.

    Progress must progress.

    And some part of me believes that the eagles are willing to sacrifice a number of themselves in order to protect the water from being polluted by the oils humans indiscriminately dump that render the fish the eagles eat poisonous.

    Quite a stretch of reasoning there, eh?

    But, I believe it.

    Non-humans will sacrifice themselves to preserve their species.

    Eagles are not ruled by profit margins.

    Wolves don't give a crap about the bottom line.

    Humans are the only animals ruled by avarice.

    Yes, there are days I rue being born hue-man.
     


    You have multiplied my thoughts!

    I miss you Flower. That is one thought.

    Eagles!

    Do you know I went into the northland about thirty years ago, maybe forty and I was trapped with a partner's child underneath a structure hoping that we would not be killed? hahahahahahah

    The eagle just sat there.

    And then, my dog and I would visit an eagle's nest every day for a year (they change nests anualy I guess) and dad would sit right there looking at me and my dog?

    And I would see the eagles passing over the lake in this eden from time to time and really really wonder?

    I read some tract about some company receiving some sort of reprieve with regard to the impending deaths of eagles. That is from the government.

    This all has to do with the death of eagles related to wind energy.

    The eagle is regal to me.

    I have seen him up close (or her, since I am not that keen on eagle sex)

    Anyway, my research demonstrates to me anyway, that Eagles are not on their way out just because of wind energy.

    Oh, Flower I have missed you.

    Good to see you again.

    Eagles shall always be with us, and that is because they are so goddamn bright.

    Eagles have always been sacred to me.

    the end


    I hope you are doing well this days.  {{{Hug}}}  Sending you warm and good wishes.  We don't seem to fight hard enough for our environment. 


     

    A lot to think about in this essay, DD.  I spent 5 and a half years in Oklahoma when I was in college;  a New Yorker in a strange land ... I used to laugh when it was pointed out that Oklahoma is the only state that has a working oil well on it's statehouse grounds.  

    The transition from one energy source to another is going to be fraught with problems, no matter which way we go.  The transitions from whale oil to coal and from coal to petroleum all solved one problem and then created another.    Supporting this many people on a finite planet takes an increasing amount of energy.  We either figure out how to create new sources or we give up our current lifestyles ....  and I'm willing to bet that that choice is going to be an easy one for the majority of people;  They'll take their current lives over a few birds and nearly extinct animals any day ...  Do you choose your sleep comfort bed or a rock in a cave?  You can keep the eagles if you choose the rock.  (I know, and I was fond of those eagles too ...  but ...)

    What also popped out at me from your essay was the fact that you may have found the key talking point for progressives to counter all that states right talk we've had to endure for a generation from the conservatives.  Progressives could counter the argument for states' rights by setting each state against its neighbor; that is, remind them that the way to stop their neighboring states from making up some stupid laws which could have a devastating ecological effect on them is to have consistent laws which all states have to abide by.  Only a strong central government can keep these individual rogue states in line.  Just a thought for another discussion.

     


    Yeah, that is the issue for me.

    That is, what one state does affects contiguous states.

    What one municipality does affects other localities.

    And who is to really arbitrate this mess?

    The Feds.

    That is all we have, in the end.

    Again, Minnesota cannot just throw its excrement into the Mississippi or other rivers that flow into other states; without some regulation!

    And as far as air pollution, well a system in the middle of some state will affect other municipalities or states with regard to the air others' breathe. ha

    I do not have any answers as such.

    I just see it coming, as it were.

    How does one or any government handle this situation?

    These are very difficult issues concerning employment and the safety of our citizenry and the purity of 'our' water and air and....

    This is complicated.

    And I just do not wish that these issues be settled by international corporations who could give one goddamn about our country.

    the end


    I think Progressives might need to take it up a couple of notches and set their hysteria on fear/panic the same way the Repubs do about almost everything.  You know, that frothing-at-the-mouth, making-up-phony-scary-wedge issues level ... that way, they can drive the point home, and by targeting individual issues in individual states and keeping it up, they just might be able to create a new base of support that sees the benefits of the Feds acting for the good of all, and not leave some states reeling from the actions of their more craven neighboring states.  


    This is one of the finest comments I have ever received.  Ever.

    Hell, almost  a year later.

    But damn, you have hit upon the real issues.

    Not political ramblings, but real issues.

    I mean we are  not going to 'kill' ND's ability to make monies.

    That is  not just stupid, it is idiotic and provides us with no alternatives.

    Your comment means more to me than just logic.

    It hits me with a reality that I forget sometimes.

    lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

    You have a real take on this issue.

    Supposedly we have a Constitution that protects states from ignoring the laws of other states.

    And yet, we must acknowledge that due to nuisance and trespass, the civil law, that we must give the Feds the right to work it out.

    This is fine comment that I kind of missedl

    WHO DECIDES?