MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
Vice President Joe Biden
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20501
Dear Mr. Vice President,
My name is...., and I grew up in a house full of guns. My Dad was a .... Police officer, a gun enthusiast, and a mostly-responsible gun owner. As you can imagine, I know a little about guns, and a lot about gun-owner behavior. I see that the President has given you the unlovely task of coming up with recommendations in the wake of the Newtown tragedy, and I hope you'll do me the honor of engaging in discussion about what those recommendations might usefully be.
I believe that you should steer away, except for banning high-capacity magazines, from discussion of gun or ammunition design, and focus instead on a set of simple best practices for gun-owners and sellers, to be written into Federal Law and called the "Newtown Rules," in honor of the twenty children who died on December 14, 2012.
The truth is that the way gun owners and sellers do things now is a mess, and we all know that quite a number of people who own guns for sport, self-defense, and for the sacred purpose of protecting the rest of us dummies from mass killers and threats to The Constitution, don’t do a very good job of looking after their weapons. There are now ten states in which more people die in front of a gun than behind the wheel of a car, yet so-called “responsible gun owners and sellers” seem to believe that all those guns just fell down from the sky and into the arms of people who couldn’t use them appropriately. There is much to do that doesn’t involve getting stuck in the weeds of trigger and grip design. The simple “Newtown Rules,” if adhered to, will prevent most of the gun disasters that now befall us. As you share these practices with "responsible gun owners" nationwide, you have my full permission to say "Some of these practices are so fucking obvious that I'm embarrassed to have to suggest them as laws." (I know you enjoy the occasional use of the vernacular, and I think it will really get people's attention.)
Simply put, the “Newtown Rules” are a set of gun practices in the areas of storage, supervision, safety, sobriety and overall behavior which will hold gun owners to a standard of genuine and suitable responsibility. They will also outline penalties for those who overestimate their ability to keep their weapons out of the hands of people who would use them in an irresponsible way. The right for an adult to own a gun may be guaranteed by the Second Amendment, but those whose responsibility or ability to care for weapons falls into question will not be encouraged, or in some cases, permitted to keep them. Many of the rules will be easy to understand because they are similar to the rules for responsible drinking and responsible driving, which have made our roads so much safer over the past 30 years or so.
I’m sure you can see where I’m going with this, and are perfectly able to put together the “Newtown Rules” on your own or with your government colleagues. But if you wish to include me, my contacts and I would be honored to have the opportunity to add our two cents on the specifics. I’ve done quite a lot of thinking about how really responsible gun owners might be persuaded to stop crowing about their rights and focus right quick on their responsibilities. I do ask that if you wish to share or publicize this letter, please let me know; I’d need to break the news to my Dad that I told the Vice-President our family’s gun practices might have been a little lacking at times.
As I mentioned above, I think this is a terrible job. But you are a practical person, a gun enthusiast with a son in the military, and a man who has lost a child himself; I believe you are perfectly positioned to do it. Like many others, I wish we didn’t have to talk about this. We all hoped that "responsible gun owners" would live up to their name, and in that hope, we failed to protect the twenty beautiful children who perished in Newtown. I have a six-year-old daughter myself, and I know that we must not fail again. The very preciousness of the children those devastated Newtown parents have lost, and the children that the rest of us, by whatever grace exists in the universe, still have, must inspire us to purposeful, patient and reasonable action in pursuit of a nation that is safer for our children.
Thank you so much for your service, Mr. Vice-President. Godspeed.
Sincere regards,
Comments
Good for you for writing, erica. I hope others will write as well.
I like the frame of rights entailing responsibilities as well. I think that is promising as a way of discussing the issue that many middle of the road citizens will find resonant, or at least acceptable.
Perhaps penalties after the fact for those who violate the rules might be enough of a deterrent to reduce the incidence of bad practices in the first place, depending on how clear and how enforceable the rules are, and what the penalties are.
On this part...
I find these a bit vague. Perhaps it is, or will be, obvious to those who read the letter what those practices would be, or perhaps you have not yet formulated more specific thoughts on them.
I might have missed them in other posts or comments but would be interested to hear a bit about current registration practices if you have looked into that or know something about them. Are existing requirements too weak to be effective? Are they unenforceable? Enforceable but generally unenforced?
Also, are you aware of laws anywhere in the country imposing penalties on those who sell firearms without, say, performing a required background check first, certifying they've done so, and posting the information on a database? Is there a practical way to try such a system? Would it be a good idea, worth trying--as possibly having some positive impact? Obviously, this would create an incentive for people to purchase their guns outside of the country, including in places where there are no or meaningless regulations. I am wondering if there is a way of creating any, or more, skin in the game for sellers of firearms.
Thanks for sharing the letter.
by AmericanDreamer on Thu, 12/20/2012 - 5:31pm
I outlined some of them in "Watch out for Joe." I think it basically comes down to making owners responsible for their own activities, as well as what others do with their guns. Stuff like:
Trigger lock for every gun. No exceptions. Keys also need to be locked away.
High-quality gun storage. I am talking about safes. (If you can't afford it, maybe consider penknives.)
Only classic (not semi-auto) weapons may be displayed in your home.
Close supervision of teens with guns. (If your teen takes your gun and kills him/herself or someone else with it, I don't care how devastated and sorry you are. You are going to jail.)
Children under 18 learn to shoot classic (not semi-auto) weapons. (We need to try hard not to get in a big debate about what's what here.)
Ammo locked up separately. (No more going off to bed leaving a gun propped against the wall and a box of ammo in the basement.)
Penalties for biological, step and live-in parents of a child who uses a gun to commit a crime. (Not sure how to do this one, but the idea is, it takes a village.)
No carrying or discharging a gun with a blood alcohol level higher than that at which you could legally drive. Even on your own land. Even in your own home. This is not "Independence Day," in which the habitual drunk sucks it up and protects the world from aliens. You are going to have to shoot your friend in the foot while sober.
Violent behavior loses gun rights. Temporarily or permanently.
Domestic abuse loses gun rights. Temporarily or permanently.
Crazy fast or reckless driving loses gun rights. Temporarily or permanently.
Other forms of antisocial or reckless behavior could lose you your gun rights.
The way your kids behave could lose you your gun rights. Juvenile delinquency or excessive absenteeism from school prompts a call to the home to enquire about gun safety.
If you sell a weapon to someone who uses it to commit a crime, you could lose your gun rights. This will get a lot of blowback from sellers. Who cares?
Stuff like that. Gun ownership is about to become a lot less like fantasy football and a lot more like an actual responsibility.
by erica20 on Thu, 12/20/2012 - 6:18pm
Thank you.
by AmericanDreamer on Fri, 12/21/2012 - 12:11am
erica, Kudos - very well done and of course, sorely needed.
I'm looking forward to his response.
by Aunt Sam on Thu, 12/20/2012 - 5:42pm