actually I don't see a bad thing going on there, I see a smart judge who wants to see some case law set down on the books as concerns what her lawyer argued
The decision, by U.S District Judge Andre Birotte Jr., notes that Mo'Nique raised a "novel theory," arguing that Netflix's alleged failure to negotiate an “opening offer” in good faith, as is customary in the industry, constitutes an “adverse employment action” for purposes of a retaliation claim.
I thought it positive. Discrimination Is carried out in many ways, not all obvious. Is this analogous to a type of redlining at the real estate office? Women Are supposed to be "bad at negotiating", but if the guy who negotiates (the Harvey Weinsteins?) only bargains with the dudez, women are justified in taking a raw but only deal, and it's codified discrimination. Worse, the Mo'niques Are test cases used as signál to the rest of the pack - "no 2nd Chance fór you, take what we give", which can be abuse of relative monopoly power.
Comments
by PeraclesPlease on Sun, 07/19/2020 - 5:32am
actually I don't see a bad thing going on there, I see a smart judge who wants to see some case law set down on the books as concerns what her lawyer argued
by artappraiser on Sun, 07/19/2020 - 4:54pm
I thought it positive. Discrimination Is carried out in many ways, not all obvious. Is this analogous to a type of redlining at the real estate office? Women Are supposed to be "bad at negotiating", but if the guy who negotiates (the Harvey Weinsteins?) only bargains with the dudez, women are justified in taking a raw but only deal, and it's codified discrimination. Worse, the Mo'niques Are test cases used as signál to the rest of the pack - "no 2nd Chance fór you, take what we give", which can be abuse of relative monopoly power.
by PeraclesPlease on Sun, 07/19/2020 - 7:02pm