MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
In his latest Salon post, Michael Lind promotes his new book, "Land of Promise: An Economic History of the United States" with a brief history of American Industrial Policy. As a major proponent of the lost School of American Economics, it promises to be enlightening.
[I]ndustrial policy is as American as domestically produced apple pie. George Washington supported Alexander Hamilton’s plan for promoting American manufacturing by means of subsidies and tariffs, and Hamilton’s opponents Thomas Jefferson and James Madison eventually reconciled themselves to federal support for American manufacturing. Henry Clay proposed a similar “American system” of infant-industry protection and federal support for infrastructure. During the Civil War, Clay’s disciple Abraham Lincoln presided over the enactment of a version of the American System, based on high tariffs to protect strategic industries and federal land grants and financial subsidies for transcontinental railroads.
Industrial policy was even more successful in the 20th century U.S. After the Wright brothers invented the airplane, the federal government used airmail to subsidize the infant American civil aviation industry. The U.S. Navy worked with American companies to create the Radio Corporation of America (RCA), which spun off the NBC and ABC radio and TV networks. During World War II the government built vast numbers of factories, which were turned over at low prices to private companies after 1945.
The most innovative entrepreneur in the 20th century was the U.S. government. The federal government invented or developed nuclear energy, computers, the Internet and the jet engine. And it built the interstate highway system and completed the national electric grid, creating a continental market based on the technologies of the second industrial revolution.
Comments
Thanks for the link, Emma.
Sorta related: I was just looking over a Feb. 13 Forbes magazine and there is this essay by Peter H. Diamandis, a sort of abstract of his book Abundance: Why The Future Will Be Much Better Than You Think. It's extremely boosterish about private innovation, sort of an opposite view, but there are some interesting arguments he makes about big picture history. Judging from a skim of the accompanying Forbes article about him, being Mr.. Innovation Booster is his raison d'etre.
by artappraiser on Wed, 02/01/2012 - 7:45am
"Thanks for the link, Emma."
Right back at you.
I certainly agree with Diamandis that:
What I fear is that the current haves will figure out that what they have will be much less meaningful at that point and find some way to conserve and even expand the gap between themselves and the have-nots.
That and the possibility of a DIYer or CERN stumbling onto ice nine or something equivalent. ;-\
by EmmaZahn on Wed, 02/01/2012 - 11:56am