For those seeking background about, and a better understanding of the significance of, Christianity Today’s call for Trump’s removal from office, please read this from one of the Washington Post’s religion reporters: https://t.co/lHgVlmAdUY
The Mark Galli interview at CNN is good at showing how simple the motivation for the editorial is.
His points about not expecting to change "peoples' opinions" is noteworthy. He says he would rather not say anything about something so political but felt silence in the face of so much evidence would imply approval of the acts.
Sociology academic specializing in religion and politics, supporting Galli's p.o.v.:
Actually, in America our “authority” as citizens is the Constitution. We don’t have “rulers” that are laws unto themselves. And because Trump violated the Constitution (again, our real authority), Christians are biblically bound to oppose him. https://t.co/sQkwQAj7Wr
I think of it as a simple matter of listening to the teaching that "by their fruits, we shall know them."
It is parallel to the teaching that one should be less concerned with what one puts into their mouth than what comes out of it.
So the statement that people believing X are morally bound to do Y is not helpful.
The biblical teaching regards whether one can perceive what is happening or not. Apart from whatever one "believes" as creed, it places the importance of means versus ends in a precise context. Hiring thieves to do serve a common good is not on the program.
[....] In an unwittingly self-revealing moment, Trump responded to the magazine’s indictment of his profound moral failings with an argument that is thoroughly transactional and megalomaniacal: How dare you criticize me, after all the power I’ve granted to your movement? You’re breaking our deal, and now you’re dead to me.
"Some evangelical Christians are turning against Donald Trump in the immediate wake of his impeachment by the House of Representatives. This was bound to happen. ... But I didn't expect the reversal to come with such thunder." | Jay Parini for @CNNOpinionhttps://t.co/26a5OCGdOQ
The Christianity Today editor appeared on CBS 'This Morning" show today, The Hill summarizes:
"It strikes me as strange that for people that take the teachings of Jesus Christ seriously ... that we can't at least say publicly and out loud and in front of God and everybody that this man's character is deeply, deeply concerning to us." https://t.co/tajTkM901k
"At the end of the day, we write for a readership of One. God is our Tower. Let the whirlwind come..." Christianity Today has published a follow-up to its editorial calling Trump unfit for office and unworthy of support by evangelical Christians. https://t.co/a0pJSTggRb
Rut roh, this is the stuff of schisms, heresy, witch hunts....
New: 100+ prominent evangelicals, including multiple conservative Christians who have advised Trump, today wrote to Christianity Today’s president — a further offensive against the magazine’s Thursday editorial that called for Trump’s removal.https://t.co/WTmVqR0q5c
By Allison Gordon @ CNN.com, Updated 5:14 PM ET, Tue December 24, 2019
Washington (CNN) An editor for a Christian news website says he is resigning after the publication of a pro-Donald Trump editorial, saying his former employer has chosen to make a "business decision" to align itself with the President rather than follow its moral principles.
The resignation of Napp Nazworth from The Christian Post, announced on Twitter Monday, is the latest example of a recent heated debate among evangelicals about Trump, who enjoys overwhelming support from the community.
"The Christian Post does not normally discuss personnel matters though we would like to say that we are so very grateful for Napp's contribution over these many years and we wish him the best," the Christian Post said in an email to CNN on Tuesday. "We will remain a publication rooted in our Christian faith & committed to objectivity in our reporting & diversity in our opinions."
Last week, another evangelical publication, Christianity Today [....]
I like the title of the book by the author of the review article: D. L. Mayfield is a writer living in Portland, Oregon. She is the author of Assimilate or Go Home: Notes from a Failed Missionary on Rediscovering Faith (HarperOne). In a nutshell it blasts purist ideologues of all kinds, culture warriors and the screamers against "cultural appropriation."
I think the more appropriate biblical reference, in this case, would be Jesus saying he had come with a sword.
Mr. Rogers repeats the rebuke delivered to those who waffled and misconstrued.
As the passage goes: "Worry less about what you put in your mouth than what comes out of it."
I'm sure that was a phallic reference. Jesus was probably just flirting with one of his followers. I never bought that chastity line. All those Christian leaders are fucking around now. Jesus was probably no different
Perhaps my reference to the conflict prefigured in the Gospel has been taken too literally.
The article I responded to in regards to Mr. Rogers notes that he was trying to resist an ethos that held children in thrall to a code that negated their feelings and perceptions of what was going on in the world.
One is, of course, free to see the dynamic as matter of Christian thought or not. It is pretty clear what Mr. Rogers thought of the subject.
a main operative for The Lincoln Project (new Never Trumper GOP organization) gloating about how the CT op-ed played out:
The @CTmagazine editorial clearly came as a surprise and shook up @realDonaldTrump's gang. Their responses have been classic panicky campaign tactics. @ProjectLincoln and many others will deliver plenty more for them to worry about in 2020. https://t.co/Qy0j8tmkO0
White evangelical Trump supporters are so lucky all the Democratic candidates are pro-choice. Can you imagine how difficult it’d be for them to justify their vote if they couldn’t pretend it was about abortion and not partisan tribalism, xenophobia, and Christian nationalism?
Trump flies to Miami tomorrow to deliver remarks to “evangelicals for Trump coalition launch,” before returning to his Mar a Lago resort where he has been vacationing for a couple weeks pic.twitter.com/WPxxyf6XNV
Comments
It will be interesting to see the responses of Franklin Graham, Paula White, etc will be. Their argument is that Trump has been anointed by God.
by rmrd0000 on Thu, 12/19/2019 - 10:05pm
Consistent. (from Oct 2016). Did they just refile the previous article? @CTmagazine
https://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2016/october-web-only/speak-truth-t...
by PeraclesPlease on Thu, 12/19/2019 - 11:51pm
Ted Olson signed off on the letter?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/603952/
by PeraclesPlease on Fri, 12/20/2019 - 12:26am
The Mark Galli interview at CNN is good at showing how simple the motivation for the editorial is.
His points about not expecting to change "peoples' opinions" is noteworthy. He says he would rather not say anything about something so political but felt silence in the face of so much evidence would imply approval of the acts.
by moat on Fri, 12/20/2019 - 5:27pm
Sociology academic specializing in religion and politics, supporting Galli's p.o.v.:
by artappraiser on Sat, 12/21/2019 - 5:42pm
I think of it as a simple matter of listening to the teaching that "by their fruits, we shall know them."
It is parallel to the teaching that one should be less concerned with what one puts into their mouth than what comes out of it.
So the statement that people believing X are morally bound to do Y is not helpful.
The biblical teaching regards whether one can perceive what is happening or not. Apart from whatever one "believes" as creed, it places the importance of means versus ends in a precise context. Hiring thieves to do serve a common good is not on the program.
by moat on Sat, 12/21/2019 - 10:37pm
by artappraiser on Sat, 12/21/2019 - 3:31am
Greg Sargent @ WaPo, similar thoughts: Trump’s rage at Christianity Today gives away his scam, Dec. 20:
by artappraiser on Sat, 12/21/2019 - 4:47am
by artappraiser on Sat, 12/21/2019 - 3:41am
The Christianity Today editor appeared on CBS 'This Morning" show today, The Hill summarizes:
by artappraiser on Sun, 12/22/2019 - 7:59pm
by artappraiser on Mon, 12/23/2019 - 12:47am
Rut roh, this is the stuff of schisms, heresy, witch hunts....
Thou shalt have no other gods before me
by artappraiser on Mon, 12/23/2019 - 8:56pm
no Soros!
by artappraiser on Mon, 12/23/2019 - 9:11pm
Christian publication editor quits over pro-Trump editorial
By Allison Gordon @ CNN.com, Updated 5:14 PM ET, Tue December 24, 2019
by artappraiser on Wed, 12/25/2019 - 10:29pm
Mr. Rogers, the anti-Trump : blessed are the meek (or is soft and listening pro-actively "meek"?)
https://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2018/october/mr-rogers-good-neighbo...
by PeraclesPlease on Fri, 12/27/2019 - 2:01pm
I like the title of the book by the author of the review article: D. L. Mayfield is a writer living in Portland, Oregon. She is the author of Assimilate or Go Home: Notes from a Failed Missionary on Rediscovering Faith (HarperOne). In a nutshell it blasts purist ideologues of all kinds, culture warriors and the screamers against "cultural appropriation."
by artappraiser on Fri, 12/27/2019 - 5:30pm
I think the more appropriate biblical reference, in this case, would be Jesus saying he had come with a sword.
Mr. Rogers repeats the rebuke delivered to those who waffled and misconstrued.
As the passage goes: "Worry less about what you put in your mouth than what comes out of it."
by moat on Sat, 12/28/2019 - 5:31pm
I'm sure that was a phallic reference. Jesus was probably just flirting with one of his followers. I never bought that chastity line. All those Christian leaders are fucking around now. Jesus was probably no different
by ocean-kat on Sat, 12/28/2019 - 6:28pm
Don't hold back, dude, don't hold back.
PS - what was Jesus's "sword"? Care to "pontificate"?
by PeraclesPlease on Sat, 12/28/2019 - 6:35pm
Perhaps my reference to the conflict prefigured in the Gospel has been taken too literally.
The article I responded to in regards to Mr. Rogers notes that he was trying to resist an ethos that held children in thrall to a code that negated their feelings and perceptions of what was going on in the world.
One is, of course, free to see the dynamic as matter of Christian thought or not. It is pretty clear what Mr. Rogers thought of the subject.
by moat on Sun, 12/29/2019 - 5:55pm
a main operative for The Lincoln Project (new Never Trumper GOP organization) gloating about how the CT op-ed played out:
by artappraiser on Sat, 12/28/2019 - 7:50pm
Post piles on
https://www.christianpost.com/amp/convict-trump-the-constitution-is-more... at Christian
by PeraclesPlease on Sat, 12/28/2019 - 8:07pm
Surprisingly robust, but then the cynic in me says: they might be looking forward to the idea of a President Pence.
by artappraiser on Sat, 12/28/2019 - 9:49pm
Interesting point:
by artappraiser on Sat, 12/28/2019 - 7:57pm
Emergency op?
by artappraiser on Thu, 01/02/2020 - 11:20pm