This significantly increases the role of Black and Hispanic Democrats; it also increases the role of moderate Democrats since Black and Hispanic Democrats are on average more moderate than white Democrats. https://t.co/gLGS5ZdbPF
Left-wing Democrats are ideologically committed to the view that increasing Black and Hispanic representation is good, which gives moderates this opportunity to bolster their power inside the coalition. https://t.co/5THSjMDbP9
President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris delivered an early preview of their reelection campaign Friday night, rallying the Democratic Party faithful ahead of an expected formal 2024 announcement https://t.co/4J2KCWobaK
The DNC voted to reorder the early primary states. Iowa is out and New Hampshire is essentially demoted. It’s particularly harsh to NH Dems given they didn’t do anything wrong and it’s an actual swing state. https://t.co/wWqLKZVc1S
The fact that the National Democratic Party will now give up on the state of Iowa (and to a lesser extent Ohio) as too white and rural and Midwestern is a big emblem of why this system is polarized and broken. You don’t matter anymore.
1/The Dem Party is on the cusp of becoming majority-minority. However, in my first @ManhattanInst issue brief, I argue that if current trends persist, it is likely to become a maj-min. party that is inordinately and indefinitely governed by a highly educated white minority.
2/Researchers of American politics have noted a growing 'diploma divide', which is particularly pronounced among whites. Whereas a college degree (and vocab test scores) was traditionally positively associated with GOP identification among whites, this association has flipped. pic.twitter.com/ZNQkXCdj9E
3/While this shift has been slowly brewing for some time (college educated whites tend to be more socially liberal, and the GOP has grown more outwardly socially conservative), it has accelerated with the rise of Trump..so much so that by 2020 (and for the 1st time ever)..
4/…whites with college degrees outnumbered whites without among self-identified Democrats. They and non-college-educated non-whites now comprise the largest segment of the Dem coalition. Meanwhile, rates of degree attainment have flatlined and even declined among white Reps. pic.twitter.com/09cA6oF5Km
5/ If you're a Dem, there is some reason to celebrate, as the college educated tend to give more political donations and are more politically active and sophisticated in general. However...
6/ ...there is also a more uncomfortable side to this trend, which some might deem to be 'elephant in the room'. Specifically, this growing marriage of college educated whites with the Dem party is exacerbating socioeconomic inequalities within the coalition.
7/ First, disparities in rates of degree attainment between white and non-white Dems are now larger than ever before. Rates have also risen overtime among non-whites, but at roughly half the rate as whites. Thus, slower growth rates + growing alignment of col whites=larger gaps pic.twitter.com/zvLAYgR0nY
8/ The upshot is that even though the white share of Dems is in terminal decline, whites are now more overrepresented among Dem degree holders than ever before. pic.twitter.com/WXs2bh1kxi
9/Second, and as one might expect (given that the college educated tend to earn more), gaps in earnings and measures of occupational standing have also been on the rise. And these extend even to subjective measures of social class. pic.twitter.com/53JaLJpfjn
10/ Given the association between socioeconomic status and various forms of political engagement, the enlargement of socioeconomic inequalities risks the enlargement of political inequalities (including , ultimately, influence over the Dem Party agenda). By some measures, this.. pic.twitter.com/49z0mswBrH
11/...is already happening. For instance, differences in the shares of white vs. non-white Dems that report high levels of attention to political information are larger than ever. pic.twitter.com/6sQpGj5IIH
12/ Further, when asked about the news they follow most closely, White Dems. are far more likely to select ‘national politics’ pic.twitter.com/K0uC7wsJ97
13/ And, unsurprisingly, they are significantly more likely to report being exposed to high levels of political content on social media, and on twitter in particular, where they are likely responsible for an outsized share of political tweets pic.twitter.com/3130hq1uHF
14/They also consistently score higher on measures of basic political knowledge; and, at least on some indicators, this gap may be growing (though it's recently shrinking vis-a-vis Asians). pic.twitter.com/trlyddsMwx
16/Needless to say, those more psychologically engaged with and knowledgeable about politics are more likely to engage in (especially influential) forms of political participation, such as contacting elected officials and donating to political campaigns.
18/Perhaps most striking, though, is that despite the white share of Dems declining 24 points between 1980-2020, whites are now more overrepresented among large donors (while holding their ground among small donors) to Dem congressional candidates than ever before pic.twitter.com/12QLcMcwYz
19/ But the truth is that disparities have been growing in even more basic forms of political participation, such as voting (which is clear when you actually validate respondents' self-reported voting behavior) pic.twitter.com/VKctqBypjV
21/ But the truth is that turnout rates didn't decline among non-white Dems, they just increased much more among white Dems (which, incidentally, is similar to recent trends in degree attainment).
22/ All told, the increasing Dem-alignment of college educated whites is allowing--and will continue to allow--white Dems to punch above their otherwise diminishing share of the party. In essence, they have traded quantity for quality. The upshot is that the means..
24/ To the extent that the issue priorities and preferences of educated white Dems entirely overlap with those of less educated non-whites, there’s arguably less reason for concern. But given that those of higher socioeconomic status tend to...
25/...prioritize post-material issue concerns (so-called 'luxury beliefs'), whereas those of lower SES tend to care more about kitchen-table/quality-of-life issues, divergences in preferences and priorities are inevitable. pic.twitter.com/eeDqZ7rGMi
26/ And where divergence occurs, the advantages of white Dems afford them a better chance of having their priorities reflected in the agenda and rhetoric of Dem leaders and candidates.
27/ One of the consequences then is that the Democratic Party spends far more time and political capital on progressive pet causes than they would if the influence of white Dems were commensurate with their (declining) share of the party. pic.twitter.com/ogJhfigIwf
28/While these trends hardly portend a mass exodus of socially conservative working class non-whites from the Dem Party, they do create a vulnerability that the GOP could exploit to pry away a small but electorally consequential subset. pic.twitter.com/v0DyCjnWmC
30/ Whether Reps. can continue to capitalize on and sustain or further such shifts is an open question. But unless they plan on re-ingratiating themselves with col-ed whites by abandoning or moderating their social conservatism, their political survival may depend on it. pic.twitter.com/27rB0q7raV
Well that's surprising. I mean, being VP really helped Pence transform into a contender, and I'm pretty sure Joe would've still won even if Clyburne hadn't rescued his campaign and COVID hadn't limited campaigning. I mean, look at Gore, the VP-ship set him up well. Except, well, that he lost. But then Gerald Ford, how about it - he got to be Přez, amirite? Mondale coulda if he'd only won about 25-28 more states.
And then there's Dukakis vs Jackson - Jackson presenting a natural ceiling, especially in 1988, and Dukakis only inspiring so far (definitely not in a tank). Kamala's more Dukakis than Jackson (or Obama), and while race was an inspiring aspect to '88 and 2008, it's a negative with gun shootings and anti-woke sentiment.
I think Gore's a bad example. Even though I know from reading about what he did as V.P. that he would have made a great president, I think his manner was extremely off-putting to a lot of people who ended up voting for him based only on "the better of two bad choices." A tiny bit more congenial candidate would have made it much less of a nail biter, and then Roger Stone et.al. couldn't have done what they did.
He had his share of awkwardness, but the Maur to n Dowds were out to play horserace and turn everything he said into a question. Just for a reality check, Clinton only got 42% of the vote in 1992, and in 1996 ihe basically tied with Dole+Perot (if Perot hadn't come across unhinged round 2 it would've been much lower).
The press had to make Bradley a contest much like they made Bernie a contest (tho Bernie was more inspiring than basketball Bill, who made Gore look animated & endearing in comparison).. But for sure Gore's robotic ways of explaining things didn't help.
reality check backatcha: people liked Clinton + Perot just fine, heck one could even say enough people still liked GHW Bush better than Al Gore once he got going with his arrogant schoolmarm persona. It was: shit I guess I have to vote for the arrogant schoolmarm or maybe I'll give the Bush kid a try, he's got a lot to learn but at least I could have a beer with him.
You have a tendency to blame the big time pundits like Dowd as if they made stuff up to influence the country - on that we totally disagree. I think it's just the opposite, that only the elites read them and those pundits had a talent for seeing the pulse of what's really going on with Joe Sixpack and were are informing the elites of what they see. You think they were early influencers, I don't at all. Heck SNL's writers also saw an arrogant ass when they looked at Al Gore, they didn't need Dowd to tell them to make that character.
NOW social media has changed the situation somewhat, but it's still pretty much the case that pundits are not creating their people/followers, but grifting on telling them what they want to hear.
If you want a big win, run somebody more charming than Al Gore or Hillary Clinton, it's really that simple. If you want a result that is so much like a tie that it can be manipulated, run problematic personalities.
Oddly 2 things can happen at once. So while some candidate can have flaws, some dumb cunt like Gayle Collins can abuse her position as prime columnist to rake over a candidate for some past offense like putting his dog on the roof - over and over and over again more than 2 dozen times. What a bitch.
Did Gore's transgressions exceed the stupidity of complaints about his father's lodgings or his summers in Tennessee or his statement about Love Canal even?
No, they were just being dicks. Yes, to survive in politics you must put up with newspaper dicks and pretend they don't bother you. Gayle Collins always a cunt, but a well-supported one, so don't cross her. Maureen Died as well, who else?
This is the most fascinating #SOTU. I am mesmerized by the back and forth. Biden is edgy, clever. It has got a real "in the arena" feel and as close to what the constitution probably intended that I've seen in my lifetime.
Marge was trying to earn a Fox news clip, instead she fired Joe up and made him give one of the best speeches if his life All Trumpsters do is lose and cry and lose more. https://t.co/xpo0rMBP4k
Marjorie Taylor Greene doesn’t know the difference between the State of the Union Address and the Rocky Horror Picture Show. She just showed everyone how ridiculous MAGA is. And why did she keep yelling “liar” at George Santos? That wasn’t nice.
My God, it's just poetry, watching Biden tussle with Marje Greene as she does her best imitation of that famous Real Housewives of New Jersey scene. pic.twitter.com/KDSauuGUqS
if you missed any of Biden's #SOTU and want to get up to speed, my video thread covering his speech and Sarah Huckabee Sanders's reaction to it begins here https://t.co/4BMjzxQfyR
A TENSE moment in the House chamber as Biden trashes unnamed Republicans for wanting to sunset Social Security and Medicare — not naming Rick Scott. Rs erupted in boos and jeers. MTG yelled “liar!” Scott now responds to the president >>https://t.co/Tz4C8bzXRV
he tweeted during the speech, I especially like stuff like this:
Biden needles Republicans who voted against the infrastructure law but take the money. "I want to thank my Republican friends who voted for the law. And my Republicans friends who voted against it as well. I still get asked to fund the projects in those districts as well." 1/2
Biden, continued, on Republicans and infrastructure: "But don't worry, I'll promised I'd be a president for all Americans. We'll fund these projects. And I'll see you at the groundbreaking." 2/2
From CNN's excellent team of beat reporters and from me, 12 State of the Union fact check items and counting in our rolling file here: https://t.co/xHpT7wNTQR
on foreign policy, pretty damn good for a forner stutterer:
“It’s never been a good bet to bet against America”.
Open threat to China and others in Biden’s State of the Union Address to Congress.
Here’s the short segment where Biden reasserts US global leadership in Europe and Asia.
Vows to cooperate with China when possible. pic.twitter.com/Pq9O6mwC69
It was a bit awkward as rhetoric but the upshot was he got all the Republicans to endorse his position on the issue, which seems pretty good. https://t.co/1vUE07pHGK
When I was an intern in Schumer's office we did a Sunday presser on hidden *66 and *69 fees and it was a big hit so we ended up doing localizations in Buffalo, Syracuse, Binghamton, etc https://t.co/acJYkCSt5C
Dark Brandon forcing Republicans to loudly promise that they won't cut Medicare or Social Security is the most effective use of the SOTU address I've ever seen.
WOW. President Biden just called out Republicans for trying to repeal the Inflation Reduction Act and promises that if that happens, he will VETO it. We need more of Dark Brandon calling out these Republicans for what they're trying to do to hurt American families.
Damn.
Dark Brandon is a badass.
I would have melted under that audience anger in front of the world. He went right at it. Protected #SocialSecurity and Medicare from the greed of the rich and powerful. Amazing. #SOTUpic.twitter.com/DZ1n816k7B
BREAKING: Dark Brandon gets Lauren Boebert & Matt Gaetz to look like Grinches as he calls on Billion dollar corporations to pay their fair share of taxes during the State of the Union.
It was fuckin epic. Never seen someone that can make extreme assholes like them stand tf up and applaud lol You go Dark Brandon! lol https://t.co/CGDAJawTC1
"That's not a white, black or brown problem. That's everybody's problem." Mho, if Democrats want to win some national races, they need to steal back this messaging from the GOP who stole it from Dem centrists:
They REALLY got to stop with the Identify Politics!!! Really now,it's really past time to Sister Souljah those people! The only identity that should be allowed in the Dem party: American.
NEW: Democrats win control of the Pennsylvania state House for the first time in 12 years following victories in 3 special elections. This victory will likely thwart Pennsylvania's GOP-led state Senate from further restricting access to abortion and voting.https://t.co/5rUjV6M0DT
BY RAFAEL BERNAL - @TheHill.com, 02/09/23 8:32 PM ET
The Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) has no political staffers on the active payroll after Chairwoman Rep. Nanette Diaz Barragán (D-Calif.) fired Executive Director Jacky Usyk on Thursday.
The news of the firing was first reported by Dear White Staffers, an Instagram account run by anonymous Congressional staff that keeps tabs on alleged workplace abuses in the Capitol.
A half-dozen sources confirmed the news to The Hill; no CHC members returned requests for comment on the firing.
A spokesperson for Barragán did not return a request for comment.
“This debacle unfolding at the CHC doesn’t bode well for the Caucus and for Congresswoman Barragán, who fired a well-liked staffer a month into the start of the new Congress,” a Democratic strategist with knowledge of the situation said.
The other three political staff who worked at the CHC prior to Barragán’s appointment as chairwoman left between December and January.
The staff exodus comes as Barragán settles into her position at the head of the 42-member organization, a group with significant sway over policy choices in the broader Democratic Caucus [....]
Californians have told me—on the doors, at events, even at the grocery store!—they have trouble trusting government officials to put the public's interests before their own. Congress can and should start addressing this common concern by banning top officials from trading stocks. pic.twitter.com/SyPYDwxKu7
"These demographic trends beget an awkward paradox: the Democratic Party will likely become a majority-minority party relatively soon, but one that is still largely and disproportionately steered by liberal college-educated whites." https://t.co/A68YaGvE46
NEW: House Democrats' main super PAC says it will pour a record $45 million into New York to try to flip back 5+ seats and with them, the House majority.
HMP's Mike Smith on the centrality of NY in '24: “It’s not just us seeing it."https://t.co/m2gfqB2DRV
^ mho, all the money in the world won't help if the state party doesn't disavow the woke lefties of manhattan/brooklyn, especially on law & order, but other culture wars things, like oh, gas stoves, pronoun policing over math in schools, 'transing' children and dissing white & Asian people
get back the Dem and swing votes that went to Zeldin over Hochl for governor, that's all you gotta do. Oh and tell AOC to STFU, buckle down and just pay attention to her own district.
This will never cease to anger me. NYC progressives, mostly white, who call for defunding the police live in safe neighborhoods where they have nearly zero chance of being killed. Their policies would hurt poor black neighborhoods that they never visit.
1/https://t.co/IhxCvLp4OOpic.twitter.com/Wyr6CuPLuc
Of the 488 NYC murder victims in 2021:
Black (and black Hispanic)-359
Hispanic-81
White-28
Asian-17
Unknown-3
The difference is stark. I wonder how many anti-police white progressives are aware of this disparity?
(Killed by the NYPD in 2021? Five men.)
2/xhttps://t.co/1hjWyem42z
P.S. That means 90% of those murdered in NYC were black or Hispanic, and only 6% were white. That's a white murder rate of about 1 per 100,000, comparable to European countries. I live in a very safe city. A few miles away, it's a very different story.
3/xx
Pisses me off too. To the point where if Adams hadn't run, I probably would have voted for the Republican.
Few see the true awfulness of 'the white well-off woke' like New Yorkers do. Including up-staters - they get it, they are normies who see the deluded charades.
edit to add:
For reference police killed about 5 people in NYC in that time.
In the 2022 Minneapolis city election, a defund the police measure was on the ballot. The Black neighborhoods strongly voted against. The white progressive areas supported it. The measure failed.
Education polarization has gifted Republicans an advantage in the senate, but Democrats an advantage in low-salience elections. https://t.co/LEx0aj9Zou
I think the same underlying factor is driving a lot of the "misinformation" anxiety — Republicans used to have clearly higher levels of political knowledge but the GOP has been picking up low-info voters and losing high-info ones. https://t.co/kKcTLjR41Z
If "people who care a lot about politics" tend to break your way, then you get really focused on information as a virtue (Limbaugh used to complain about low-information Obama voters) whereas if it goes the other way you become romantic about mobilization and turnout.
^ So Dems should stop getting "romantic about mobilization and turnout"? That Black guy or female Hispanic business owner may no longer be a sure Democratic vote?
Today he's doing the jobs jobs jobs thing - I wonder at the wisdom of that since so many seem to be into capitalist gambling these days one way or another-
My economic plan invests in families like the one I grew up in.
Families that rely on their paychecks, not their stock portfolios, to put food on the table. pic.twitter.com/fddOwvaPZC
Not that i was impressed with what she brought/didn't bring to the Nigerian election...
Stacey should have taken a job with the Biden administration instead of running again. Now she should listen to GA voters, they’re just not interested in her as a governor. She should put her considerable talents to use elsewhere.
I don't see Hillary out running for office a 3rd time...
Imagine Bernie's had enough too.
Is Abrams a better executive or legislator? Or in an administration somewhere? At some point the Harry & Meghan routine of just being in the news a lot wears thin.
Comments
by artappraiser on Sat, 02/04/2023 - 6:24pm
by artappraiser on Sat, 02/04/2023 - 6:35pm
by artappraiser on Sat, 02/04/2023 - 6:38pm
a reminder:
by artappraiser on Sat, 02/04/2023 - 7:24pm
Andrew Yang:
by artappraiser on Sat, 02/04/2023 - 7:30pm
by artappraiser on Sun, 02/05/2023 - 2:48am
by artappraiser on Sun, 02/05/2023 - 2:53am
by artappraiser on Tue, 02/07/2023 - 6:49am
Well that's surprising. I mean, being VP really helped Pence transform into a contender, and I'm pretty sure Joe would've still won even if Clyburne hadn't rescued his campaign and COVID hadn't limited campaigning. I mean, look at Gore, the VP-ship set him up well. Except, well, that he lost. But then Gerald Ford, how about it - he got to be Přez, amirite? Mondale coulda if he'd only won about 25-28 more states.
And then there's Dukakis vs Jackson - Jackson presenting a natural ceiling, especially in 1988, and Dukakis only inspiring so far (definitely not in a tank). Kamala's more Dukakis than Jackson (or Obama), and while race was an inspiring aspect to '88 and 2008, it's a negative with gun shootings and anti-woke sentiment.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1988_United_States_presidential_election
by PeraclesPlease on Tue, 02/07/2023 - 1:41pm
I think Gore's a bad example. Even though I know from reading about what he did as V.P. that he would have made a great president, I think his manner was extremely off-putting to a lot of people who ended up voting for him based only on "the better of two bad choices." A tiny bit more congenial candidate would have made it much less of a nail biter, and then Roger Stone et.al. couldn't have done what they did.
by artappraiser on Tue, 02/07/2023 - 3:20pm
He had his share of awkwardness, but the Maur to n Dowds were out to play horserace and turn everything he said into a question. Just for a reality check, Clinton only got 42% of the vote in 1992, and in 1996 ihe basically tied with Dole+Perot (if Perot hadn't come across unhinged round 2 it would've been much lower).
The press had to make Bradley a contest much like they made Bernie a contest (tho Bernie was more inspiring than basketball Bill, who made Gore look animated & endearing in comparison).. But for sure Gore's robotic ways of explaining things didn't help.
by PeraclesPlease on Tue, 02/07/2023 - 3:34pm
reality check backatcha: people liked Clinton + Perot just fine, heck one could even say enough people still liked GHW Bush better than Al Gore once he got going with his arrogant schoolmarm persona. It was: shit I guess I have to vote for the arrogant schoolmarm or maybe I'll give the Bush kid a try, he's got a lot to learn but at least I could have a beer with him.
You have a tendency to blame the big time pundits like Dowd as if they made stuff up to influence the country - on that we totally disagree. I think it's just the opposite, that only the elites read them and those pundits had a talent for seeing the pulse of what's really going on with Joe Sixpack and were are informing the elites of what they see. You think they were early influencers, I don't at all. Heck SNL's writers also saw an arrogant ass when they looked at Al Gore, they didn't need Dowd to tell them to make that character.
NOW social media has changed the situation somewhat, but it's still pretty much the case that pundits are not creating their people/followers, but grifting on telling them what they want to hear.
If you want a big win, run somebody more charming than Al Gore or Hillary Clinton, it's really that simple. If you want a result that is so much like a tie that it can be manipulated, run problematic personalities.
by artappraiser on Tue, 02/07/2023 - 5:08pm
What the fuck are you talking about?
" But for sure Gore's robotic ways of explaining things didn't help."
Like I'm not denying Gore came across like a school ma'arm. So get off my back.
by PeraclesPlease on Tue, 02/07/2023 - 5:59pm
Oddly 2 things can happen at once. So while some candidate can have flaws, some dumb cunt like Gayle Collins can abuse her position as prime columnist to rake over a candidate for some past offense like putting his dog on the roof - over and over and over again more than 2 dozen times. What a bitch.
Did Gore's transgressions exceed the stupidity of complaints about his father's lodgings or his summers in Tennessee or his statement about Love Canal even?
No, they were just being dicks. Yes, to survive in politics you must put up with newspaper dicks and pretend they don't bother you. Gayle Collins always a cunt, but a well-supported one, so don't cross her. Maureen Died as well, who else?
If The Squad can be assholes, so can the press.
https://www.americamagazine.org/content/all-things/seamus-dog-again
by PeraclesPlease on Tue, 02/07/2023 - 7:31pm
on SOTU, Rick Wilson retweeted:
by artappraiser on Tue, 02/07/2023 - 11:06pm
p.s. High praise
I thought it good, but honestly wouldn't have gone that far. He would know better, though, as far as politically!
by artappraiser on Wed, 02/08/2023 - 1:56am
by artappraiser on Tue, 02/07/2023 - 11:09pm
he tweeted during the speech, I especially like stuff like this:
by artappraiser on Tue, 02/07/2023 - 11:17pm
by artappraiser on Tue, 02/07/2023 - 11:19pm
on foreign policy, pretty damn good for a forner stutterer:
by artappraiser on Tue, 02/07/2023 - 11:32pm
Yglesias:
by artappraiser on Tue, 02/07/2023 - 11:45pm
Dark Brandon is now trending on Twitter; examples:
by artappraiser on Tue, 02/07/2023 - 11:58pm
nice short video recap right after the speech, trying to be objective, by the reporter for Bloomberg in the room:
by artappraiser on Wed, 02/08/2023 - 12:57am
a professor of marketing:
by artappraiser on Wed, 02/08/2023 - 9:19pm
Note: is a poll of viewers, of course
by artappraiser on Thu, 02/09/2023 - 6:27pm
"That's not a white, black or brown problem. That's everybody's problem." Mho, if Democrats want to win some national races, they need to steal back this messaging from the GOP who stole it from Dem centrists:
They REALLY got to stop with the Identify Politics!!! Really now,it's really past time to Sister Souljah those people! The only identity that should be allowed in the Dem party: American.
by artappraiser on Thu, 02/09/2023 - 6:52pm
AOC v. Pelosi:
by artappraiser on Fri, 02/10/2023 - 12:04am
by artappraiser on Fri, 02/10/2023 - 12:07am
Hispanic Caucus chair fires executive director; group’s staff down to zero
BY RAFAEL BERNAL - @TheHill.com, 02/09/23 8:32 PM ET
by artappraiser on Fri, 02/10/2023 - 3:44am
by artappraiser on Fri, 02/10/2023 - 7:52pm
by artappraiser on Thu, 02/16/2023 - 4:11am
Just a reminder of the old days and ways:
by artappraiser on Tue, 02/21/2023 - 2:00am
a few of my favorites from the last 24 hrs.:
and from a few days ago
by artappraiser on Wed, 02/22/2023 - 2:08am
by artappraiser on Wed, 02/22/2023 - 6:04pm
^ mho, all the money in the world won't help if the state party doesn't disavow the woke lefties of manhattan/brooklyn, especially on law & order, but other culture wars things, like oh, gas stoves, pronoun policing over math in schools, 'transing' children and dissing white & Asian people
get back the Dem and swing votes that went to Zeldin over Hochl for governor, that's all you gotta do. Oh and tell AOC to STFU, buckle down and just pay attention to her own district.
by artappraiser on Wed, 02/22/2023 - 6:16pm
tell em how it is, Carl
Pisses me off too. To the point where if Adams hadn't run, I probably would have voted for the Republican.
Few see the true awfulness of 'the white well-off woke' like New Yorkers do. Including up-staters - they get it, they are normies who see the deluded charades.
edit to add:
by artappraiser on Wed, 02/22/2023 - 7:45pm
he's not even asking for money!!!
by artappraiser on Wed, 02/22/2023 - 9:08pm
by artappraiser on Thu, 02/23/2023 - 8:31pm
^ So Dems should stop getting "romantic about mobilization and turnout"? That Black guy or female Hispanic business owner may no longer be a sure Democratic vote?
by artappraiser on Thu, 02/23/2023 - 8:35pm
one guy who'd rather the party pick somewhere else for its convention:
by artappraiser on Fri, 02/24/2023 - 7:54pm
note the nonpartisan messaging:
by artappraiser on Sun, 02/26/2023 - 12:36am
Talking points that are partisan:
Today he's doing the jobs jobs jobs thing - I wonder at the wisdom of that since so many seem to be into capitalist gambling these days one way or another-
by artappraiser on Mon, 02/27/2023 - 2:39pm
noted that Hakeem Jeffries is being more specific about who the political enemy is:
by artappraiser on Mon, 02/27/2023 - 2:42pm
p.s. noted that first reply to him is a lefty needling him!
by artappraiser on Mon, 02/27/2023 - 2:46pm
He's a savvy guy in Atlanta:
by artappraiser on Fri, 03/17/2023 - 1:15am
Not that i was impressed with what she brought/didn't bring to the Nigerian election...
I don't see Hillary out running for office a 3rd time...
Imagine Bernie's had enough too.
Is Abrams a better executive or legislator? Or in an administration somewhere? At some point the Harry & Meghan routine of just being in the news a lot wears thin.
by PeraclesPlease on Fri, 03/17/2023 - 3:26am