“I barely knew Bill Barr. He wasn’t up for the job. When I fired him he begged to stay like a dog. He was a volunteer. Coffee boy.” https://t.co/UljecGgqub
Meanwhile, there's this editorial disagreement about priorities:
Barr's PR nonsense is not the story. The story is your president just engaged in Ukraine-level quid pro quo extortion, but this time against one of the United States.
IN PLAIN SIGHT ON TWITTER!
In an open letter released Thursday morning, 40 prosecutors representing most major towns and cities across the country aimed to flip the script on Barr in light of his recent comments attacking many of those same district attorneys (DAs) over pro-reform efforts and widespread opposition to the federal government’s brutal immigration crackdowns.
By Jennifer Rubin @ WashingtonPost.com, Feb. 13, 2020 at 11:34 a.m. EST
In a rare act of public challenge to the Trump administration, the New York City bar has written a remarkable letter to Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz as well as the chairs and ranking minority-party members of the House and Senate Judiciary committees — Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), Rep. Douglas A. Collins (R-Ga.), Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.). The letter begins:
We write to express our deep concerns about the impartial administration of justice in connection with the prosecution of Roger Stone in federal court in Washington, D.C., and to call for immediate investigations by Congress and by the Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General. Recent actions by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, a component of the United States Department of Justice, raise serious questions about whether the Department of Justice is making prosecutorial decisions based not on neutral principles but in order to protect President Trump’s supporters and friends. In our criminal justice system, a single standard must apply to all who are accused or convicted of violating the law — unequal treatment based on political influence is to be deplored in all cases but is especially dangerous if it emanates from the presidency.
The letter recounts the facts surrounding Stone’s crime and conviction, the sentencing recommendation and revision, and Trump’s public intervention. The letter bats down the notion that this is any way normal. The bar writes: “ [....]
BREAKING Chief U.S. District Judge Beryl A. Howell of Washington also issued a rare statement responding to President Trump’s attacks on Stone’s sentencing judge, U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson, and defending the integrity of the courts. https://t.co/LhicnjBjNxpic.twitter.com/MSiNthX3lS
Judge Howell: “The Judges of this Court base their sentencing decisions on careful consideration of the actual record in the case before them ... Public criticism or pressure is not a factor.”
Judges also rely, Howell said, on "the applicable sentencing guidelines and statutory factors; the submissions of the parties, the Probation Office and victims; and their own judgment and experience."
Comments
Meanwhile, there's this editorial disagreement about priorities:
More here on my blog posting.
by artappraiser on Thu, 02/13/2020 - 4:34pm
by artappraiser on Thu, 02/13/2020 - 5:46pm
by artappraiser on Thu, 02/13/2020 - 10:26pm
by artappraiser on Thu, 02/13/2020 - 10:39pm
Excerpt:
by artappraiser on Thu, 02/13/2020 - 10:33pm
Before the interview went public: The New York City bar goes after William Barr
By Jennifer Rubin @ WashingtonPost.com, Feb. 13, 2020 at 11:34 a.m. EST
by artappraiser on Thu, 02/13/2020 - 11:37pm
by artappraiser on Fri, 02/14/2020 - 12:29am
John Dean to Preet Bharara on topic:
by artappraiser on Fri, 02/14/2020 - 2:42am
They colluded non-collusion?
by PeraclesPlease on Fri, 02/14/2020 - 3:04am
by artappraiser on Fri, 02/14/2020 - 4:52pm