Facebook in India has been selective in curbing hate speech, misinformation and inflammatory posts, particularly anti-Muslim content, according to leaked documents obtained by @AP. The files show that Facebook has been aware of the problems for years. https://t.co/WxiuyniOaG
In 2019, a pair of Facebook employees set up a dummy account to better understand the experience of a new user in India.
Without any direction from the user, the Facebook account was soon flooded with pro-Modi propaganda and anti-Muslim hate speech. https://t.co/cRqTdlezrA
New: Internal Facebook documents show its services are used to spread religious hatred in India. Company researchers identified calls to violence that coincided with 2020 riots in Delhi that left 53 dead. @WSJ's Facebook Files latest. With @JeffHorwitzhttps://t.co/y6wEsw65CW
Mark Zuckerberg praised India in December as a special and important country for Facebook, saying that millions of people there use its platforms every day to stay in touch with family and friends...
Internally, researchers were painting a different picture: Facebook’s products in India were awash with inflammatory content that one report linked to deadly religious riots.
Inflammatory content on Facebook spiked 300% above previous levels at times during the months following December 2019, a period in which religious protests swept India, researchers wrote in a July 2020 report that was reviewed by The WSJ.
Rumors and calls to violence spread particularly on Facebook’s WhatsApp messaging service in late February 2020, when communal violence in Delhi left 53 dead, according to the report. India is Facebook’s biggest market with hundreds of millions of users.
Hindu and Muslim users in India say they are subjected to “a large amount of content that encourages conflict, hatred and violence on Facebook and WhatsApp,” such as material blaming Muslims for the spread of Covid-19 and assertions...
Facebook researchers interview dozens of users in India. A Hindu man in Delhi told them he received frequent messages on Facebook and WhatsApp “that are all very dangerous,” such as “Hindus are in danger, Muslims are about to kill us,” the researchers reported.
There is “so much hatred going on” on Facebook, one Muslim man in Mumbai told the researchers, saying he feared for his life. “It’s scary, it’s really scary.”Many of the users believed it was “Facebook’s responsibility to reduce this content” in their feeds, on WhatsApp
Facebook researchers determined that two Hindu nationalist groups with ties to India’s ruling political party post inflammatory anti-Muslim content on the platform, according to two separate reports earlier this year by teams investigating abuse of the company’s services.
One promotes “dehumanizing posts comparing Muslims to ‘pigs’ and ‘dogs’ and misinformation claiming the Quran calls for men to rape their female family members.” The group remains active on FB, and wasn’t designated as dangerous due to “political sensitivities,” the report said.
The reports show that Facebook is privately aware that people in its largest market are targeted with inflammatory content, and that users say the company isn’t protecting them.
Facebook says it bans groups or individuals “after following a careful, rigorous, and multidisciplinary process" and some reports were working docs containing investigative leads for discussion, not complete investigations, and didn’t contain individual policy recommendations.
One Muslim man in Mumbai told researchers that “if social media survives 10 more years like this, there will be only hatred.” Unless FB does a better job of policing content, India will be a “very difficult place to survive for everyone,” he said.
^ Note especially the accusations of purposeful rape by Muslims of Hindu women and intentional miscegenation, as well as name calling of Muslims as animals. Remind you of anything in U.S. history?
Indians live religiously segregated lives. Most form friendship circles within their own religious community and marry someone of the same faith; interreligious marriages are very uncommon. Indeed, a majority of Indians say it is very important to stop both women and men in their community from marrying outside their religion.
Generally, Indians do not object to members of other religious groups living in their village or neighborhood. Still, a substantial share of Indian adults say they would be unwilling to accept members of certain other religions as neighbors.
These kinds of preferences for living separate lives vary by religion. While large shares of Hindus and Muslims say all their close friends share their religion, Christians and Buddhists tend to have slightly more mixed social circles and to attach less importance to stopping interreligious marriage.
Geography is also a factor. People in the South of India tend to be more religiously integrated and less opposed to interreligious marriages. For example, Hindus who live in the South are more likely than Hindus in other regions to say they would accept a Muslim or a Christian as a neighbor. The Central region of the country, by contrast, stands out as highly religiously segregated.
Views on religious segregation also are related to levels of education. In general, Indians with a college degree are more inclined to accept people of other faiths as neighbors, and less opposed to religious intermarriage, than are Indians who have less education.
Among Hindus in particular, attitudes toward interreligious marriages and neighborhoods are closely tied to views on politics and national identity. Hindus who strongly favor religious segregation – those who say that all their close friends are Hindus, that it is very important to stop Hindus from marrying outside the faith and that they would not accept people of some other faiths as neighbors – are much more likely than other Hindus to take the position that it is very important to be a Hindu to be “truly” Indian. They are also more likely to have voted for the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in the 2019 parliamentary elections.
Members of both large and small religious groups mostly keep friendships within religious lines [....]
Good day and greetings fellow also-humans, I am human Mark Zuckerberg and I wish to be excited to announce a grand nomenclature moment which will affect your perceptions. pic.twitter.com/JIuPxuXLmL
Comments
by artappraiser on Tue, 10/26/2021 - 3:22am
^ Note especially the accusations of purposeful rape by Muslims of Hindu women and intentional miscegenation, as well as name calling of Muslims as animals. Remind you of anything in U.S. history?
by artappraiser on Tue, 10/26/2021 - 3:30am
RELIGION IN INDIA: Pew Research Center, June 29, 2021
3. Religious segregation
by artappraiser on Tue, 10/26/2021 - 3:40am
by artappraiser on Thu, 10/28/2021 - 2:42pm
I meta jerk like that once...
by PeraclesPlease on Thu, 10/28/2021 - 4:28pm
good one!
by artappraiser on Thu, 10/28/2021 - 4:32pm