She will regret that. With West ensconced to throw tantrums and force floor votes on every issue that isn't decided Bernie's way, he will insure that Dems are muddied at the convention.
If you look at which Sanders choices are there, it's fairly straight-forward folk, not putting Cornel West on committe. She's more careful in bargaining than that.
What I read here is abut how much I know about these guys but as they are described they sound like a different 'straight forward' than we are used to.
True - we're likely suckers any way it pans out...
The reason for the glut of Bakken crude now rolling into the March Point and Cherry Point refineries in Washington State goes back to 2012, when Obama opened up millions of acres for gas and oil in 23 states, ushering in the fracking boom that brought us the ‘bomb trains’ owned by Obama’s friend Warren Buffett since 2009, when he purchased Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad (BNSF) for $34 billion–the same year TIDES Foundation funded 350.
In 2010, 350 launched the campaign to reject KXL; by 2014, crude-via-rail in the US soared to 500 thousand car loads per year, up from 5 thousand in 2008, with trains exploding across Canada and the US.
To refresh readers’ memories, the KXL ‘grassroots’ hoax was funded in large part by TIDES (flush with Buffett money) with 350 at the helm. Funds laundered through Buffett’s foundation NOVO and the TIDES Foundation — a money laundry used by Tar Sands investors and other elites to control NGOs — helped finance the KXL NGO charade, thus eclipsing any discussion about shutting down the Tar Sands, and making possible the explosive growth of bomb trains and other pipelines.
So instead of a pipeline out of Canada, we'll have this fracking bonanza riding around on Mr. Buffett's new toy trains. Modern railroad baron indeed. Are we safe yet?
Meanwhile it is bizarre that Sanders chose to focus on Palestine & environment, and not place a hard-hitting economist/next-gen monetarist on the panel. Cornel West's suggestions would of course not come close to a respected economist pushing for Wall Street banking & Fed reforms, or analyzing the jobs situation and possible solutions. Major punt?
Also worth pondering how the shoe would look on the other foot. Would the Sanders clan welcome 5 members of Wall Street whores and warmongers and environment-destroying vampire capitalists onto their platform committee? For all the accusations of Hillary as divisive and vindictive, she seems rather accommodating and inclusive. Will there ever be a point where "Fucking Liar" Hillary's accepting left-focused solutions on various socio-economic issues can be thought of as sincere vs. simply dishonestly pandering (with a presumed post-election shift)?
Notice that Sanders supporters only tell us what Clinton supporters have to do soothe their hurt feelings. They will defend their venom by saying they are only stating the facts. There is nothing Clinton supporters can do to appease a Sanders supporters. There will always be something else Clinton has to do. Then, at the end of the day, they will still not vote for Hillary.
Comments
She will regret that. With West ensconced to throw tantrums and force floor votes on every issue that isn't decided Bernie's way, he will insure that Dems are muddied at the convention.
by CVille Dem on Tue, 05/24/2016 - 7:31pm
If you look at which Sanders choices are there, it's fairly straight-forward folk, not putting Cornel West on committe. She's more careful in bargaining than that.
Update: or maybe I'm wrong...
by PeraclesPlease on Tue, 05/24/2016 - 11:02pm
What I read here is abut how much I know about these guys but as they are described they sound like a different 'straight forward' than we are used to.
by A Guy Called LULU on Wed, 05/25/2016 - 2:18am
True - we're likely suckers any way it pans out...
So instead of a pipeline out of Canada, we'll have this fracking bonanza riding around on Mr. Buffett's new toy trains. Modern railroad baron indeed. Are we safe yet?
Meanwhile it is bizarre that Sanders chose to focus on Palestine & environment, and not place a hard-hitting economist/next-gen monetarist on the panel. Cornel West's suggestions would of course not come close to a respected economist pushing for Wall Street banking & Fed reforms, or analyzing the jobs situation and possible solutions. Major punt?
by PeraclesPlease on Wed, 05/25/2016 - 5:16am
Also worth pondering how the shoe would look on the other foot. Would the Sanders clan welcome 5 members of Wall Street whores and warmongers and environment-destroying vampire capitalists onto their platform committee? For all the accusations of Hillary as divisive and vindictive, she seems rather accommodating and inclusive. Will there ever be a point where "Fucking Liar" Hillary's accepting left-focused solutions on various socio-economic issues can be thought of as sincere vs. simply dishonestly pandering (with a presumed post-election shift)?
by PeraclesPlease on Wed, 05/25/2016 - 6:24am
Sanders, West, and the Sandernistas do not believe in compromise.
by rmrd0000 on Tue, 05/24/2016 - 7:55pm
Kind of like the TEA-Baggers. Are these the Sand-baggers?
by CVille Dem on Tue, 05/24/2016 - 7:59pm
LOL, I'm going to steal that.
Notice that Sanders supporters only tell us what Clinton supporters have to do soothe their hurt feelings. They will defend their venom by saying they are only stating the facts. There is nothing Clinton supporters can do to appease a Sanders supporters. There will always be something else Clinton has to do. Then, at the end of the day, they will still not vote for Hillary.
by rmrd0000 on Tue, 05/24/2016 - 8:44pm