As burned as they feel right now, Dems have to be careful about how hard they drag #Manchin for killing #BBB. Because Dems need him to pass #VotingRights, which he supports, tho not quite there yet on the filibuster. Failure here is not an option, if US #democracy is to survive. https://t.co/Ha78qFoMAT
Look at the difference in this spin by Hasan on the same!
Manchin is not only deeply right-wing, he’s also deeply dishonest. He said earlier this year he was open to a talking filibuster reform. He, just last week, along with the GOP okayed a ‘change with the filibuster’ on the debt limit.
There’s a very long paper trail of Manchin making the same demands as today and pointedly not committing to the WH framework or the House bill it’s derived from. If there’s something he said differently in private that they’re mad about, not much evidence of it so far.
I do trust Carl Hulse to have an inkling of what's really going on here:
Senators love to talk about how their word is their bond in the chamber. Being called out for breaking your word is a big thing. That's why WH accusing Sen Manchin of a "breach of commitments" is so significant given Pres Biden's history as a senator himself. https://t.co/FafaoFXlwJ
and this is very likely too (Grossman is a very savvy Political Scientist):
My guess on what pushed Manchin over the edge: he took private offer to White House this week & then got publicly blamed for opposing the child tax credit. WH thought they could postpone & pressure him to accept more. He decided Biden wasn’t going to take a private deal & sell it
Manchin is much more progressive than anyone else who is going to win elections in West Virginia any time soon.
If you don't like depending on him, the answer is to find ways to win seats in states like NC, FL, TX, IA, and OH that Trump won twice but by less comical margins.
We've all argued ourselves to the point of illness on "popularism" over the past year, but the brutal math remains what it is — if you want to build a governing majority you need a way to run candidates who appeal to a nontrivial number of confirmed Trump voters.
Suppose you had $1.75 trillion in revenue to work with and wanted to secure the vote of a senator who is determined to reduce the budget deficit. pic.twitter.com/FGXs4MIkgj
Tuesday’s Slow Boring will outline four good options that conform to this goal, combat climate change, and expand the welfare state. https://t.co/l5hlWb0PYz
It shouldn't be difficult, but the Democratic Party simply doesn't work that way any longer. To put it differently, intersectionality makes EVERYTHING equally essential.
i see it as fundamental personality diff. The left is ‘creative chaos‘ that likes new things but can’t draw boundaries and so sort into hierarchies. The right likes order, especially status quo or past order, and wants to make decisions and get ‘er done.
It is one that particularly drives me nuts, all this blame on Manchin as if they are characters in a play. No - he represents WEST VIRGINIA. West Virginians voted for him and you cannot kick West Virginia out of the union, that's democracy too. Democracy is not: all my people get to vote, but not your people. Wake up and smell the coffee: Bernie and The Squad do not represent the whole nation either.
Quite the quote from Joe Manchin, in new statement:
"My Democratic colleagues in Washington are determined to dramatically reshape our society in a way that leaves our country even more
vulnerable to the threats we face.”
McConnell move to split infrastructure from social spending — and to support the infrastructure package — again an example of how the Senate Minority Leader playing the long game, thinking several steps ahead.
Reminder, Manchin and Schumer signed an agreement in July, then Democrats spent five months disregarding every provision of it and somehow thinking they could bully Manchin into going along. pic.twitter.com/oRKn6zZJWd
For all the grief Biden is getting for the BBB debacle, it’s kind of amazing that Schumer isn’t getting more criticism. I mean, strong case can be made that this is his screw up as much as anybody’s.
But FWIW here's one thing Schumer IS doing today -
Ted Cruz lifted his hold on confirming key Biden Admin nominations because Schumer threatened to keep the Senate in session through Christmas. Completely exposes Ted Cruz for the ideological fraud he is. Thank you @SenSchumer.
.@SenSchumer: "Under President Trump, Republicans lacked any robust legislative agenda and focused almost entirely on rubber-stamping a parade of far-right unqualified and highly ideological nominations to the federal bench. This year, we're administering the antidote." pic.twitter.com/qcx7iCaLjy
I know it's great to consider Manchin a straight shooter looking out for his constituency, but maybe he's just one more prima donna who's largely irrational and a pain in the ass? Not everyone's good at 13-dimensional chess, but too many think they are.
Sure Biden could blame it on Chuck, but doesn't sound much like him.
Tucked away inside the Build Back Better Act was a four-year extension of an excise tax that funds a program that helps sick coal miners. The current rate of the tax will expire at the end of this year, and the program faces insolvency. My latest: https://t.co/tneYMVGNqf
Here's a good example of how a centrist but still a Dem thinks. We don't hear from them often, they're usually not this noisy, they just vote and then everyone ion the left goes "but we were supposed to have a blue wave, wha' happened?":
The current version of BBB has provisions Manchin objects to.
Notice how no one is screaming at Sanders for putting stuff in the bill he knows Manchin won't accept? How come no one blames Sanders for BBB being stalled?
It apparently comes as a shock to some people, bordering on blasphemy, to reveal that Saint Bernard of Sanders is an impure politician who does the same sorts of posturing and political manipulation that every politician needs to do, because politics is like that. https://t.co/USKm8CHuw8
Here's a classic troll, engaging in ButTheyHaven't-ism, blaming Democrats for what Republicans do, lying about the superpower POTUS has to enact legislation, and doing her part to elect Republicans.https://t.co/QrRdkNV75n
What we need is more Democrats in the Senate so we don't have to have every single one of them voting together in order to get a majority. https://t.co/tNfG4a2RJm
We can extend the child tax credit for ten years. Manchin supports doing that, right? We can at least do that. Get the CTC into law until 2031. Dare Manchin not to come along for a stand alone bill to do that. Then dare the squad not to come along for that.
Don’t blame Manchin for BBB’s demise. If Congress actually had a robust debate and amendment process, this would have been sorted out months ago. Having the oligarchy write a bill and then twist arms has always been, and will always be, unrepresentative, stupid, and dangerous.
Well, let's call Biden the "oligarchy", rather than "the President". That clarifies everything, doesn't it. & just replace Congress with the magically unicorn improved Congress. Amash is who by the way?
Maybe I'm wrong, but I think by "oligarchy" here he is referring to how it's often lobbyists that do the actual writing of the massive bills.
(As long as we're on that topic, one of my own pet peeves is many used the term "lobbyists" to refer to big business corporations, when they are just as often working for non-profits with agendas, i.e., the association for the handicapped or Americans for this or that tax deduction,etc....)
The Manchin long con (rejecting entreaties to switch parties, backing ARP, voting for the reconciliation instructions, confirming Biden's judges) has an endgame of ... getting money for EVs, mass transit, and clean water added to a highway bill? https://t.co/pvnBrlTeJr
“I’m not an expert but…” + “WE need to crack down on [elected senators]” = only 2.7% of her district’s voters voted + over 90% of her donations are from out of STATE.
Yes, heaven forbid other parts of the country think differently than AOC. Maybe it is not a good ol' boys club but how other parts of the country think. She is some kind of special.
To add to what Alice is saying: This (and divisions within the GOP) is why Trump could never get a budget that cut funding to Planned Parenthood (his budgets increased it), the NEA, the NEH, etc—all the culture war stuff everyone tells me they care about so much. If anything, https://t.co/EQYH4yZSkf
the Dems are closer to getting what they want than the GOP ever was. I don't say this to make anyone feel better—what the Dems want or can get is nowhere near what we need—but instead to shift our focus from weak Dems and strong Republicans and evil Manchin to 10 years of parties
holding all the levers of government and still not being able to execute their will. We face two challenges to democracy, in other words: on the one hand, a party that wants to undermine elections; on the other, a system that makes it increasingly difficult for any party to
execute its will, even if that will represents the will of the majority. For all the talk of a new GOP unleashing its fascist will upon the world, the reality is a system of two parties of near paralysis (particularly when we think about the scale of the problems we're facing).
To be clear again: it's not *Manchin* who's the real power over spending. It's Congress. And it always has been Congress. This is literally how our government was designed.
And yeah, I'd do a lot of things differently if I could redraft the Constitution.
This makes a lot of sense, but have you considered a more effective tack may be simply accusing your interlocutor of denying the validity of the election, and insisting that Joe Biden is indeed the President?
After a day of uncertainty, Manchin is, in fact, on the call with Senate Dems tonight as they discuss their path forward, per two sources familiar with the matter
Manchin addressed the caucus, I’m told. He said he’s consistent for the past five months, saying inflation is a problem and noting he has been raising geopolitical concerns as well. He said they need tax reform to force the rich to pay more, per a source
Manchin told the caucus, per another source: “Inflation is a serious issue. These programs will cost more than they are saying. I can’t add to the debt.”
Schumer told caucus they would still hold procedural vote on BBB. In Senate language, he said, per source: “In the new year, we will have a vote on the Motion to Proceed to the House-passed bill.”
He added: “At this time, it is my intention to make the Senate substitute amendment the current Senate text as published and shared with your offices, unless we are able to reach an agreement on modifications acceptable to the entire caucus ahead of that.”
from the second tweet, if true, certainly blows a hole in the "Maserati Manchin" meme: He said they need tax reform to force the rich to pay more, per a source. Conservative about deficit spending? yes absolutely (and granted, many with chops on topic think that silly in this situation). But a fuck-the-poor "Maserati Manchin"? No. (Actually, he's more like onea them "tax-and-spend libruls" that Republicans used to talk about long ago.)
I'd suggest people go back and read, or re-read, the Slate article at the top of this thread. A lot of the disagreement is a belief that a lot of these programs won't last any longer than the current Congress and therefore won't accomplish a thing, so a lot like throwing money in the wind.
Comments
(edit: oops!)
by artappraiser on Sat, 12/18/2021 - 8:56pm
found retweeted by Laura Rozen:
by artappraiser on Sun, 12/19/2021 - 11:14am
Look at the difference in this spin by Hasan on the same!
In a way I actually find his take very undemocratic; ironically, he doesn't seem to "get" democracy. Hers is more like it.
by artappraiser on Sun, 12/19/2021 - 11:58am
Chertok also just retweeted this:
by artappraiser on Sun, 12/19/2021 - 12:00pm
by artappraiser on Sun, 12/19/2021 - 12:31pm
I do trust Carl Hulse to have an inkling of what's really going on here:
by artappraiser on Sun, 12/19/2021 - 1:21pm
and this is very likely too (Grossman is a very savvy Political Scientist):
by artappraiser on Sun, 12/19/2021 - 1:25pm
That sounds like a rookie move - especially after 6 months. Color me skeptical.
by PeraclesPlease on Sun, 12/19/2021 - 1:43pm
Yglesias:
by artappraiser on Sun, 12/19/2021 - 11:18am
more:
I find these a couple of interesting replies
by artappraiser on Sun, 12/19/2021 - 11:26am
Gerrymandering and quasi-legal state governing remains a problem.
by PeraclesPlease on Sun, 12/19/2021 - 12:00pm
On Yglesias' first point:
It is one that particularly drives me nuts, all this blame on Manchin as if they are characters in a play. No - he represents WEST VIRGINIA. West Virginians voted for him and you cannot kick West Virginia out of the union, that's democracy too. Democracy is not: all my people get to vote, but not your people. Wake up and smell the coffee: Bernie and The Squad do not represent the whole nation either.
by artappraiser on Sun, 12/19/2021 - 1:32pm
by artappraiser on Sun, 12/19/2021 - 11:50am
by artappraiser on Sun, 12/19/2021 - 12:35pm
by artappraiser on Sun, 12/19/2021 - 12:38pm
But FWIW here's one thing Schumer IS doing today -
by artappraiser on Sun, 12/19/2021 - 12:42pm
Perhaps cuz White House blames Manchin for a 180?
I know it's great to consider Manchin a straight shooter looking out for his constituency, but maybe he's just one more prima donna who's largely irrational and a pain in the ass? Not everyone's good at 13-dimensional chess, but too many think they are.
Sure Biden could blame it on Chuck, but doesn't sound much like him.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/joe-manchin-build-back-better-jen-psaki_n...
by PeraclesPlease on Sun, 12/19/2021 - 12:46pm
by PeraclesPlease on Sun, 12/19/2021 - 1:51pm
Here's a good example of how a centrist but still a Dem thinks. We don't hear from them often, they're usually not this noisy, they just vote and then everyone ion the left goes "but we were supposed to have a blue wave, wha' happened?":
and another, in reply to the above on AOC:
by artappraiser on Sun, 12/19/2021 - 6:00pm
by PeraclesPlease on Sun, 12/19/2021 - 6:23pm
Justin Amash
by artappraiser on Sun, 12/19/2021 - 6:07pm
Well, let's call Biden the "oligarchy", rather than "the President". That clarifies everything, doesn't it. & just replace Congress with the magically unicorn improved Congress. Amash is who by the way?
by PeraclesPlease on Sun, 12/19/2021 - 6:12pm
Maybe I'm wrong, but I think by "oligarchy" here he is referring to how it's often lobbyists that do the actual writing of the massive bills.
(As long as we're on that topic, one of my own pet peeves is many used the term "lobbyists" to refer to big business corporations, when they are just as often working for non-profits with agendas, i.e., the association for the handicapped or Americans for this or that tax deduction,etc....)
by artappraiser on Sun, 12/19/2021 - 6:37pm
Well, he's a libertarian now, so "oligarchy" means any of those bad awful people. Like "Dems+Reps".
by PeraclesPlease on Sun, 12/19/2021 - 7:44pm
by artappraiser on Sun, 12/19/2021 - 11:45pm
by artappraiser on Sun, 12/19/2021 - 11:48pm
by artappraiser on Sun, 12/19/2021 - 11:47pm
And Manchin wants this negotiated on the front page? Painfully?
by PeraclesPlease on Mon, 12/20/2021 - 1:33am
this does not at all strike me as a smart or effective way of fighting back, it actually may make things worse:
just people on Twitter can counter it right away:
by artappraiser on Mon, 12/20/2021 - 7:13pm
by artappraiser on Tue, 12/21/2021 - 8:41am
by artappraiser on Tue, 12/21/2021 - 5:20pm
by artappraiser on Tue, 12/21/2021 - 11:26pm
from the second tweet, if true, certainly blows a hole in the "Maserati Manchin" meme: He said they need tax reform to force the rich to pay more, per a source. Conservative about deficit spending? yes absolutely (and granted, many with chops on topic think that silly in this situation). But a fuck-the-poor "Maserati Manchin"? No. (Actually, he's more like onea them "tax-and-spend libruls" that Republicans used to talk about long ago.)
I'd suggest people go back and read, or re-read, the Slate article at the top of this thread. A lot of the disagreement is a belief that a lot of these programs won't last any longer than the current Congress and therefore won't accomplish a thing, so a lot like throwing money in the wind.
by artappraiser on Tue, 12/21/2021 - 11:46pm