I was a bit gobsmacked reading this part of his column:
Exceptional dangers require exceptional and sometimes unusual responses.
This was the spirit animating the volunteers at a phone bank here Tuesday night. They were asking citizens to urge their state’s popular Republican senator, Susan Collins, to oppose the confirmation of Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.
And if they found a sympathizer, they took an additional and, for some, a controversial step: Asking for a commitment to contribute to a fund that would be activated against Collins (her term is up in 2020) if she votes to confirm Kavanaugh.
The campaign is spearheaded by Mainers for Accountable Leadership and Maine People’s Alliance, and it has outraged Collins, a consensus seeker who issued an unusually sharp retort: “Attempts at bribery or extortion will not influence my vote at all.”
The organizers were unapologetic. “The idea of Susan Collins attacking an effort by 35,000 small-dollar donors as bribery is politics at its worst,” Marie Follayttar Smith, the Accountable Leadership group’s co-director, said in a statement. “We absolutely have the right to prepare to unseat her given everything Judge Kavanaugh would do on the Supreme Court to make life worse for Maine women.”
For those who might be understandably troubled about money’s electoral power being wielded so openly, there is this irony: Kavanaugh himself is, as the legal scholar Richard Hasen wrote recently in Slate, “deeply skeptical of even the most basic campaign-finance limits.”
Seriously? This is what "outrages" her? It's ok when one side does this, but not the other?
She has a fateful vote to cast. Either way she goes she is going to have a tough re-nomination (if she votes no she'll be challenged in the primary, for sure, by a heavily financed opponent) or re-election fight in 2020. If she decides to run again.
On this whole thing. The point I was trying to make, perhaps badly on another Kavanaugh thread, it all started with a few actual real nasty harassing calls and letters. As recounted in the long NYTimes report on all the activities at Collins central, that which I saw reported at The Hill when it happened
The frustration has boiled over at points. Annie Clark, a spokeswoman for Ms. Collins, provided The New York Times with copies of a letter and multiple voice mail messages addressed to the senator using vulgar language and outright threats. One caller told a 25-year-old female staff member at one of Ms. Collins’s Maine offices that he hoped she would be raped and impregnated.
I've seen this time and again with Congress when centrist votes are needed for something. And then a few loud angry lefties do something over the line. When that happens, the right in Congress grab it and run with it, start screaming bloody murder and do all kinds of anti-left p.r.. And it seems to affect the centrists, they get like affected by this psychology that the left is scary and frightening and violent and start seeing everything the left does through that prism and go a little crazy. And they then judge reasonable things the left is doing as suspect.
Because I've seen this self-defeating cycle happen so many times, I think it's extremely counter-productive to show personal anger towards centrist representatives in the form of threats and the like when you need their votes to accomplish something. The constituents and others can express all their own anger about the topic or nominee, as much as they feel, but just shouldn't direct it as threats to the representative. They are already feeling threatened enough, they very well may react irrationally and the right will try to make sure they do so.
One of our Virginia US senators, Dem Tim Kaine, who is running for re-election against, guess what, another garden variety modern era GOP far right-wing crackpot, is aggressively in opposition to Kavanaugh. The no votes of probably 90%+ of the Dem senators are a foregone conclusion. Both Kaine and Warner are towards the middle among Senate Democrats. They're not the most progressive/liberal overall and they're also not the most conservative overall, either, if we're talking general tendencies as opposed to specific issues. The challenge is to hold all Senate Dems and get now Collins and Murkowski, with Kyl a sure yes vote in lieu of McCain helping save the day by maybe, conceivably voting no.
Comments
Oops: https://www.arcamax.com/politics/fromtheleft/ejdionnejr/s-2122189
by AmericanDreamer on Tue, 09/11/2018 - 2:33pm
More from Dionne on Collins and Kavanaugh, last night at WaPo but also here with no subscription wall issues:
https://www.arcamax.com/politics/fromtheleft/ejdionnejr/s-2123999
I was a bit gobsmacked reading this part of his column:
Seriously? This is what "outrages" her? It's ok when one side does this, but not the other?
She has a fateful vote to cast. Either way she goes she is going to have a tough re-nomination (if she votes no she'll be challenged in the primary, for sure, by a heavily financed opponent) or re-election fight in 2020. If she decides to run again.
by AmericanDreamer on Thu, 09/13/2018 - 11:01am
Citizens United, baby. Try to keep up with the rest of the class.
*directed toward the Senator, not the Dreamer*
by moat on Thu, 09/13/2018 - 12:09pm
On this whole thing. The point I was trying to make, perhaps badly on another Kavanaugh thread, it all started with a few actual real nasty harassing calls and letters. As recounted in the long NYTimes report on all the activities at Collins central, that which I saw reported at The Hill when it happened
I've seen this time and again with Congress when centrist votes are needed for something. And then a few loud angry lefties do something over the line. When that happens, the right in Congress grab it and run with it, start screaming bloody murder and do all kinds of anti-left p.r.. And it seems to affect the centrists, they get like affected by this psychology that the left is scary and frightening and violent and start seeing everything the left does through that prism and go a little crazy. And they then judge reasonable things the left is doing as suspect.
Because I've seen this self-defeating cycle happen so many times, I think it's extremely counter-productive to show personal anger towards centrist representatives in the form of threats and the like when you need their votes to accomplish something. The constituents and others can express all their own anger about the topic or nominee, as much as they feel, but just shouldn't direct it as threats to the representative. They are already feeling threatened enough, they very well may react irrationally and the right will try to make sure they do so.
by artappraiser on Thu, 09/13/2018 - 2:13pm
One of our Virginia US senators, Dem Tim Kaine, who is running for re-election against, guess what, another garden variety modern era GOP far right-wing crackpot, is aggressively in opposition to Kavanaugh. The no votes of probably 90%+ of the Dem senators are a foregone conclusion. Both Kaine and Warner are towards the middle among Senate Democrats. They're not the most progressive/liberal overall and they're also not the most conservative overall, either, if we're talking general tendencies as opposed to specific issues. The challenge is to hold all Senate Dems and get now Collins and Murkowski, with Kyl a sure yes vote in lieu of McCain helping save the day by maybe, conceivably voting no.
by AmericanDreamer on Thu, 09/13/2018 - 11:14am