I have a different theory. They are both identical clones of Reichsmarshall Goering, raised in test tubes in Brazil by Dr. Mengele before his death in the 1970s.

hey, wow, I forgot about that, thanks

More on the obstruction thing here

More Questions Emerge About Mueller’s Punt on Obstruction of Justice

By John Cassidy @ NewYorker.com, 5:22 P.M.

[....] On Monday, the Wall Street Journal reported that Mueller told Barr three weeks ago that he didn’t intend to come to any conclusions on whether Trump’s actions in office, which included asking the former F.B.I. director James Comey to “go easy” on his former national-security adviser Michael Flynn and eventually firing Comey outright, amounted to criminal obstruction. The Journal’s story said that Mueller gave this information to Barr and the Deputy Attorney General, Rod Rosenstein, in a meeting on March 5th. Citing “a person familiar with the matter,” the news story said that Barr and Rosenstein were “surprised” by Mueller’s decision, and that Mueller “made that decision on his own.” You bet that Barr and Rosenstein were surprised. It’s been pretty clear all along that Trump’s lawyers were more worried about obstruction of justice than collusion, and on Tuesday a report from NBC News confirmed this. According to the NBC report, the President’s lawyers “never seriously worried their client would be accused of a Russia conspiracy.” They believed that “the real threat was obstruction of justice.”

In a post published shortly after Barr’s letter was released, I wrote that Mueller’s failure to reach a conclusion on obstruction “looks like a cop-out.” That was strong language, perhaps, but Mueller’s inaction also startled some veterans of the Justice Department [....]

and in what Comey just said to an audience

James Comey says he is confused by Mueller's decision on obstruction

“The entire rationale for a special counsel is to make sure the politicals aren't making the key charging decisions," the former FBI chief said.

By Julia Ainsley @ NBCNews.com, 9:34 pm

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — Former FBI Director James Comey told an audience in Charlotte on Tuesday that he is confused by special counsel Robert Mueller's decision to neither charge nor exonerate President Donald Trump on obstruction of justice.

"The part that's confusing is, I can't quite understand what's going on with the obstruction stuff," Comey told an audience of roughly 2,000 people gathered at the Belk Theatre for an event sponsored by Queens University.

"And I have great faith in Bob Mueller, but I just can't tell from the letter why didn't he decide these questions when the entire rationale for a special counsel is to make sure the politicals aren't making the key charging decisions," the former FBI chief said [....]

He also pushed back on Attorney General William Barr's logic in deciding not to pursue obstruction charges against the president, saying he found that part of Barr's letter summarizing Mueller's findings "really confusing."

"The notion that obstruction cases are somehow undermined by the absence of proof of an underlying crime, that is not my experience in 40 years of doing this nor is it the Department of Justice's tradition. Obstruction crimes matter without regard to what you prove about the underlying crime," Comey said [....]