Donald Trump Jr.’s response to questions about his 2016 Trump Tower meeting with Russians was drafted on Air Force One last summer and was later shown to provide misleading information.
The special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, has informed President Trump that the statement is among the things he would like to discuss in an interview.
[....] Some lawyers and witnesses who have sat in or been briefed on the interviews have puzzled over Mr. Mueller’s interest in the episode. Lying to federal investigators is a crime; lying to the news media is not. For that reason, some of Mr. Trump’s advisers argue that Mr. Mueller has no grounds to ask the president about the statement and say he should refuse to discuss it.
What is already clear is that, as Mr. Trump’s aides and family members tried over 48 hours to manage one of most consequential crises of the young administration, the situation quickly degenerated into something of a circular firing squad. They protected their own interests, shifted blame and potentially left themselves — and the president — legally vulnerable.
The latest witness to be called for an interview about the episode was Mark Corallo, who served as a spokesman for Mr. Trump’s legal team before resigning in July. Mr. Corallo received an interview request last week from the special counsel and has agreed to the interview, according to three people with knowledge of the request.
Mr. Corallo is planning to tell Mr. Mueller about a previously undisclosed conference call with Mr. Trump and Hope Hicks, the White House communications director, according to the three people. Mr. Corallo planned to tell investigators that Ms. Hicks said during the call that emails written by Donald Trump Jr. before the Trump Tower meeting — in which the younger Mr. Trump said he was eager to receive political dirt about Mrs. Clinton from the Russians — “will never get out.” That left Mr. Corallo with concerns that Ms. Hicks could be contemplating obstructing justice, the people said.
In a statement on Wednesday, a lawyer for Ms. Hicks strongly denied Mr. Corallo’s allegations [....]
Side story on "the meeting." Kudos due to Prof. Geo. Lakoff, instead of being angry, he's welcoming the opportunity of a libel suit, ready and able to spend time and money teaching recent citizen Kaveladze about how American law is quite different from Russian law:
These numbers say to me that there is no way he could fire Mueller:
85 percent of Democrats, 74 percent of independents and 51 percent of Republicans said the president should speak to Mueller, who is leading the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and possible criminal activity by Trump and his associates.
Even larger majorities said such a meeting should be under oath: 93 percent of Democrats, 85 percent of independents and 67 percent of Republicans.
Comments
Hope Hicks-related excerpt:
by artappraiser on Wed, 01/31/2018 - 11:02pm
Side story on "the meeting." Kudos due to Prof. Geo. Lakoff, instead of being angry, he's welcoming the opportunity of a libel suit, ready and able to spend time and money teaching recent citizen Kaveladze about how American law is quite different from Russian law:
Trump Tower meeting participant sues for libel
By DAVID SIDERS @ Politico.com, 01/31/2018 04:50 PM EST
by artappraiser on Thu, 02/01/2018 - 6:06pm
These numbers say to me that there is no way he could fire Mueller:
from
Poll: Vast majority says Trump should talk with Mueller under oath @ Politico.com, Feb. 1
by artappraiser on Thu, 02/01/2018 - 6:28pm