MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
By Alok Jha, science correspondent, The Guardian, 26 Dec 2012
Lede: Higgs boson theorist says he agrees with those who find Dawkins' approach to dealing with believers 'embarrassing'
[....] On one side is Richard Dawkins, the celebrated biologist who has made a second career demonstrating his epic disdain for religion. On the other is the theoretical physicist Peter Higgs, who this year became a shoo-in for a future Nobel prize after scientists at Cern in Geneva showed that his theory about how fundamental particles get their mass was correct.
Their argument is over nothing less than the coexistence of religion and science. [....] "What Dawkins does too often is to concentrate his attack on fundamentalists. But there are many believers who are just not fundamentalists," Higgs said in an interview with the Spanish newspaper El Mundo. "Fundamentalism is another problem. I mean, Dawkins in a way is almost a fundamentalist himself, of another kind." [....]
In the El Mundo interview, Higgs argued that although he was not a believer, he thought science and religion were not incompatible [....]
He said a lot of scientists in his field were religious believers. "I don't happen to be one myself, but maybe that's just more a matter of my family background than that there's any fundamental difficulty about reconciling the two."[....]