…If only the elitist president had it within himself to level with the American people, I suspect he would be pleasantly surprised. For a curious political feature of the opening years of the new multi-polar era has been the canyon in perception that has opened between average Americans (well aware what the calamities of Iraq and Lehman Brothers have done to the country) and a dimwitted foreign policy establishment, still incredibly believing the US can pretty much do as it chooses to in the world.
As a startling Pew poll from autumn of 2013 made clear, a majority of 52 to 38 percent of Americans agreed that the US should mind its own business internationally - it's the first time since 1964 that more than half of the country has held such a non-interventionist view. It is hard to run an expansive foreign policy on a budget, with a majority of the country opposed to this prospect, having been so badly burned over both Iraq and the Great Recession. Obama knows this, and to his credit has acted on this knowledge, crafting a cautious, responsible, foreign policy basing the overarching goal of his foreign policy on the tenet, "Don't do stupid stuff." Hardly heroic, but entirely in tune with times in which we live.
I believe John Hulsman (the author) has more faith in the American people than do I.
Hulsman is right that Americans don't want more military intervention. The public's current dovishness is a bright spot amid these unhappy times. I wish Obama would be as sensible as Joe Average.
I wouldn't call it a necessarily a result in a growing "dovishness" in America, as much as it is a weariness and financial reaction. If America was over "there" and "winning" with few American casualties, while the American economy was healthy and growing, a lot of those in the polls would be on the side of American intervention. So there is maybe hope that Americans are seeing what war really means in the 21st century.
Comments
[This comment has been copied from Lurker's news link to Middle-East Woes.]
Here is an interesting BBC op-ed response to Obama's commencement speech. I believe the crux of it resides in this bit:
I believe John Hulsman (the author) has more faith in the American people than do I.
by Verified Atheist on Thu, 05/29/2014 - 1:23pm
Hulsman is right that Americans don't want more military intervention. The public's current dovishness is a bright spot amid these unhappy times. I wish Obama would be as sensible as Joe Average.
by Aaron Carine on Thu, 05/29/2014 - 4:29pm
I wouldn't call it a necessarily a result in a growing "dovishness" in America, as much as it is a weariness and financial reaction. If America was over "there" and "winning" with few American casualties, while the American economy was healthy and growing, a lot of those in the polls would be on the side of American intervention. So there is maybe hope that Americans are seeing what war really means in the 21st century.
by Elusive Trope on Fri, 05/30/2014 - 7:49pm
Minor correction: that was a Deutsche Welle op-ed, not a BBC op-ed. Mea culpa.
by Verified Atheist on Thu, 05/29/2014 - 6:47pm